Objective To systematically evaluate the clinical effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) combined with grafting material for the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects. Methods The following databases such as PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, CNKI, CBM and WanFang Data were searched on computer from inception to August, 2012 to collect the relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on PRP combined with grafting material versus grafting material alone for periodontal intrabony defects. Two reviewers independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data, and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. RevMan 5.2 software was applied for meta-analysis. Results A total of 11 RCTs involving 342 patients were included. The pooled analysis on 7 RCTs showed that there was a significant difference in lower increase of clinical attachment loss (WMD=0.70, 95%CI 0.51 to 0.90, Plt;0.000 01) between the PRP combined with grafting material group and the grafting material alone group. But there was no significant difference in the gingival recession (WMD= −0.01, 95%CI −0.15 to 0.13, P=0.86). The pooled analysis on 9 RCTs showed that there was no significant difference in the reduction of plaque index (WMD= −0.04, 95%CI −0.09 to 0.02, P=0.20) between the two groups. Conclusion PRP combined with grafting material is superior to grafting material alone in the clinical attachment loss. But, there are no significant differences in gingival recession and plaque index. However, given the limited sample size and incomplete measure indexes of included studies, this conclusion still needs to be further proved by conducting more high-quality and large-scale RCTs.
Objective To explore the relationship between periodontitis and postmenopausal osteoporosis.Methods Databases were electronically searched from PubMed (1966 to December, 2010), EMbase (1974 to December, 2010), CBM (1978 to December, 2010), VIP (1989 to December, 2010), CNKI (1979 to December, 2010) and WanFang Data (January, 2007 to December, 2010), and the references listed in all papers were also retrieved. The literature was screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria by two reviewers independently; the methodology quality was evaluated after data abstraction; and then the RevMan 5.0 software was used for meta-analyses. Results Four trials were included. Among the total 678 patients involved, 263 were postmenopausal osteoporosis patients, while the other 415 were non-osteoporosis patients. The results of meta-analyses showed that: a) Clinical attachment loss (CAL) of the postmenopausal osteoporosis patients was significantly higher than that of the non-osteoporosis patients (WMD=0.60, 95%CI 0.23 to 0.96); b) The level of gingival recession of the postmenopausal osteoporosis patients was significantly higher than that of the non-osteoporosis patients (WMD=0.78, 95%CI 0.41 to 1.14); c) There were no significant differences in plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI) and periodontal probing depth (PPD) between the two groups (WMD=0.17, 95%CI 0.00 to 0.35; WMD=0.05, 95%CI –0.09 to 0.19; and WMD=–0.08, 95%CI –0.24 to 0.09); d) The results of one study indicated that the rate of periodontitis in the postmenopausal osteoporosis patients was higher than that of the non-osteoporosis patients (OR=2.45, 95%CI 1.38 to 4.34, Plt;0.01); the severe alveolar crest height loss was related to osteoporosis (OR=4.20, 95%CI 1.57 to 11.22, Plt;0.01). Conclusion Postmenopausal osteoporosis patients are more prone to suffer from periodontitis or turn to the worse stage of periodontitis. In consideration of the factors such as small scales and incomplete measure indexes of the included studies, which have influences on the intensity and comprehensiveness of this conclusion, more high-quality studies are required.
Objective To systematically review the relationship between periodontal disease and gastric cancer risk. Methods We retrieved PubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, and CBM databases to collect studies about the correlation between periodontal disease and gastric cancer from inception to January 31st, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results Five studies were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that there was no significant correlation between periodontal disease and gastric cancer (RR=0.99, 95%CI 0.83 to 1.19, P=0.93). Sensitivity analysis showed good stability. Subgroup analysis showed that the type of study, race and type of effect size have no statistically impact on the outcome, there was no significant correlation between periodontal disease and gastric cancer. Conclusion According to the current evidence, periodontal disease probably is not a risk factor of gastric cancer. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the association between periodontal disease and the incidence risk of colorectal cancer (CRC).MethodsPubMed, EMbase, WanFang Data and CNKI databases were searched to collect cohort studies and case-control studies for the association between periodontal disease and the incidence risk of CRC from inception to February 28th, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 5 prospective cohort studies were included. The results from adjusted data based meta-analysis showed that the periodontal disease was not associated with the incidence risk of CRC (RR=1.14, 95%CI 0.88 to 1.49, P=0.32).ConclusionsThe current evidence suggests that periodontal disease is not associated with the risk of CRC.
Periodontal disease is a common chronic infectious disease targeting the connective tissue supporting the dentition. In recent years, the research on periodontal disease and cerebral infarction has been increasing. However, the causal relationship between periodontal disease and cerebral infarction remains unclear. Periodontal disease may be associated with atherosclerosis, which is one of the major causes of cerebral infarction. Regular dental care can reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. Therefore, investigating the above association and its underlying mechanisms is of great clinical significance, which may help clinicians to make appropriate treatment and prevention measures. In this paper, the research progress and possible mechanism of the relationship between periodontal disease and cerebral infarction were reviewed.
Objective To systematically review the association between periodontal disease during pregnancy and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods PubMed, Web of Science, CBM and CNKI databases were electronically searched to collect studies on periodontal disease and GDM from inception to October 23, 2021. Two researchers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.4 software. Results A total of 11 studies were included, involving 2 910 pregnant women. The results of meta-analysis showed that pregnant women with periodontal disease during pregnancy reported more GDM than normal pregnant women (OR=1.81, 95%CI 1.31 to 2.50, P=0.000 3). Conclusion The current evidence suggests that there is a positive association between periodontal disease during pregnancy and the risk of GDM. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.