Abstract: Objective To summarize the clinical experience of plasma exchange （PE） during recardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) of patients with severe haemolysis in cardiac surgery. Methods Between January 2001 and December 2005, five patients required PE for severe haemolysis after cardiac surgery. There were periprosthetic leakage and infective endocarditis in 3 patients, congenital heart disease of pulmonary artery stenosis with unsatisfied right ventricular outflow tract patching in 1 patient and thrombosis during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in 1 patient. They all need blood purification to avoid acute renal failure. Results Five patients were successfully treated with PE during CPB without major complications. The amount of plasma and blood transfused in the 5 patients were 2.2±0.8L and 0.6±0.3L respectively. The volume of plasma exchange and ultrafiltrate were 3.9±1.8L and 2.4±1.3L respectively.The electrolytes and bloodgas analysis in all patients were maintained at the normal levels. The hemodynamics was stable. After heart resuscitation CPB stopped smoothly. Disappearance of periprosthetic leakage and satisfaction of right ventricular outflow tract patching were observed by echocardiograms after peration.Extubation was performed 24h after the operation in 5 patients, and they were discharged 12 to 53 d after the operation with fully recovery. The urine was clear and the body temperature was normal. Before they left thehospital, the concentration of free hemoglobin was tested in 3 patients. The concentration of free hemoglobin was slightly higher in 1 patient (68mg/L), and normal in 2 patients (lt;40mg/L). Conclusion PE during CPB in severe haemolysis is a safe technique which can effectively prevent acute renal failure caused by severe mechanical haemolysis after cardiac surgery.
【Abstract】Objective To evaluate effect of artificial liver support system (ALSS) in liver failure and liver transplantation.Methods Forty-four patients with liver failure (including 12 undergoing liver transplantation) were treated with MARS or plasma exchange. The changes of toxic substances and cytokines in blood were detected before and after treatment. Results ALSS therapy achieved a remarkable improvement in clinical symptoms and physical signs. After ALSS treatment, there was a significant decrease in total bilirubin, total bile acid, alanine aminotransferase, creatinine, urea nitrogen, blood ammonia and endotoxin levels(P＜0.05); the levels of serum NO, TNF-α, IL-4 and IL-6 were significantly decreased(P＜0.05); there was no statistical change in erythrocytes, leukocytes and platelets. The survival rate of 30 liver failure patients caused by severe hepatitis B was 60.0%(18/30). Six patients with acute liver failure were successfully performed liver transplantation. Two patients in 6 with acute liver failure after liver transplantation survived. One patient in 2 with acute liver failure after pancreatoduodenectomy survived. Conclusion ALSS plays a positive role in treatment of liver failure by removing blood toxins, NO and cytokines. ALSS also plays a substitute role for liver failure patients who are waiting for liver transplantation.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of plasma exchange (PE) versus routine medical therapy (RMT) for patients with chronic liver failure. MethodsWe electronically searched databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 7, 2014), CBM, CNKI, and VIP from inception to August 2014, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical controlled trials (CCTs) of PE versus RMT for chronic liver failure patients. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0 software. ResultsA total of 7 RCTs and 9 CCTs involving 1 632 patients (822 in the PE group and 810 in the RMT group) were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that:compared with the RMT group, the PE group had lower mortality rate (RCT:OR=0.24, 95%CI 0.13 to 0.43; CCT:OR=0.48, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.78) and higher total effective rate (RCT:OR=4.04, 95%CI 2.80 to 5.85; CCT:OR=3.45, 95%CI 2.11 to 5.64). Subgroup analysis based on the stage of liver failure showed that the PE group was superior to the RMT group in early- and intermediate-stage patients with liver failure in total effective rate (early stage:OR=4.78, 95%CI 1.87 to 12.23; intermediate stage:OR=4.43, 95%CI 1.77 to 11.08), but this difference was not found in advanced liver failure patients (OR=1.61, 95%CI 0.35 to 7.38). Seven studies reported 187 cases of adverse reactions (11.46%), and most of them were pruritus and urticaria. ConclusionCurrent evidence shows, compared with the routine medical therapy, the PE therapy could be effective to early- and intermediate-stage liver failure patients, but not be effective to advanced liver failure patients. In addition, patients who received the PE therapy have risks of adverse reactions which mainly are allergic reaction. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.