west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "Proprio ception" 1 results
  • COMPARISON STUDY ON RECOVERY OF PROPRIOCEPTION BETWEEN AUTOGRAFT AND ALLOGRAFT FOR ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION

    Objective To compare the recovery of proprioception between autograft and allograft for anterior cruciate l igament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods Between January 2008 and January 2010, 40 patients underwent ACL reconstruction with autologous tendon (autograft group, n=20) and allogeneic tendon (allograft group, n=20). No significant difference was found in gender, age, disease duration, and function scores between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). All the patients underwent the ACL reconstruction with single-bundle technique. The knee range of motion (ROM), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and Lysholm score were measured after operation. The proprioception was assessedby the joint position sense (JPS) at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. The normal knee was used as control. Results Thepatients of 2 groups achieved heal ing of incision by first intention without compl ication of infection or haemarthrosis. Allpatients were followed up 12-18 months (mean, 13.5 months). There were significant differences in knee ROM, IKDC score, and Lysholm score between preoperation and 12 months postoperatively in 2 groups (P lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in JPS 30°, JPS 60°, and JPS 90° between affected knees and normal knees in autograft group at 3 months postoperatively (P gt; 0.05). No significant difference was found in JPS 30° between affected knees and normal knees in allograft group at 3 months postoperatively (P gt; 0.05); but significant differences were found in JPS 60° and JPS 90° between affected knees and normal knees in allograft group at 3 months postoperatively (P lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in JPS 30°, JPS 60°, and JPS 90° between affected knees and normal knees in 2 groups at 12 months postoperatively (P gt; 0.05). Significant differences were also found in JPS 60° and JPS 90° between affected knees of 2 groups (P lt; 0.05) at 3 months postoperatively, whereas no significant difference was found in JPS 30° between affected knees of 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). No significant difference was found in JPS 30°, JPS 60°, and JPS 90° between affected knees of 2 groups at 12 months postoperatively (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion Autologous andACL reconstruction is better than allogeneic ACL reconstruction in the recovery of proprioception at early time after surgery.

    Release date:2016-08-31 05:44 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content