Objective To investigate the distribution and antibiotic resistance of pathogens isolated fromlower respiratory tract in mechanically ventilated patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( AECOPD) . Methods The patients with AECOPD, who were hospitalized in RICU from January 2008 to November 2009, were divided into a community infection group and a nosocomial infection group. Lower respiratory tract isolates were collected by bronchoscopic protected specimen brush for bacterial identification and susceptibility test. Results 134 cases were enrolled in the study, with 75 cases in thecommunity infection group and 59 cases in the nosocomial infection group. The positive detection rate in the nosocomial infection group was significantly higher than that in the community infection group [ 81. 4%( 48/59) vs. 54. 7% ( 41/75) ] . In the community infection group, 49 strains were isolated, in which gramnegativebacteria, gram-positive bacteria, and fungi accounted for 55. 1% , 28. 6% , and 16. 3% , respectively.In the nosocomial infection group, 55 strains were isolated, in which gram-negative bacteria, gram-positive bacteria, and fungi accounted for 61. 8% , 21. 8% , and 16. 4%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the microbial distribution between the two groups ( P gt; 0. 05) . The detection rate of ESBLs producing strains in the nosocomial infection group was significantly higher than that in the community infection group ( 58. 8% vs. 37% ) . The resistance rates in the nosocomial groups were higher than those in the community infection group. Conclusions Antibiotic resistance is serious in mechanically ventilated patients with AECOPD, especially in the nosocomial infection patients. The increased fungi infection and drug resistance warrant clinicians to pay more attention to rational use of antibiotics, and take effective control measures.
Objective To compare the diagnostic value of sterile sputumsuction tube with protected specimen brush in mechanically ventilated patients with serious lung infection, and explore the safety and efficacy of bronchofibroscope combining mechanical ventilation in the treatment of severe lung infection.Methods Seventy-four severe lung infection patients with invasive mechanical ventilation support were recruited in the study. Based on the routine treatment, the subjects were randomly divided into a control group received only mechanical ventilation, and a treatment group received sputum aspiration and bronchial lavage by bronchofibroscope combiningmechanical ventilation. Lower respiratory tract secretion was collected to analyze the bacterial etiology with sterile sputum suction tube in the control group, and with protectedspecimen brush in the treatment group. Results The positive rate of sputum suction tube and protected specimen brush was 70. 27% and 75. 68% , respectively, with no statistical difference between the two groups ( P gt; 0. 05) . The PaO2 of the treatment group increased and PaCO2 decreased obviously after sputum aspiration and bronchial lavage by bronchofibroscope ( P lt; 0. 01) . The total effective rate was also highly increased, and the heart rate and respiration were stable in the treatment group. The time of mechanical ventilation and the length of ICU stay were all shortened in the treatment group compared with the control group. Conclusions Sterile sputum suction tube can not only acquire accurate pathogen, but also is a simple and economical method for patients with severe lung infection with mechanical ventilation. Sputum aspiration and bronchial lavage with bronchofibroscope combining mechanical ventilation are effective and safe treatment for patients with severe lung infection.