Objective To compare the reduction qualities of three-dimensional visible technique without fluoroscopy and two-dimensional fluoroscopy for unstable pelvic fractures during operations. Methods The clinical data of 40 patients with unstable pelvic fractures, who met the selection criteria in three clinical centers between June 2021 and September 2022, were retrospectively analyzed. According to the reduction methods, the patients were divided into two groups. Twenty patients in trial group were treated with unlocking closed reduction system combined with three-dimensional visible technique without fluoroscopy; 20 patients in control group with unlocking closed reduction system under two-dimensional fluoroscopy. There was no significant difference in the gender, age, injury mechanism, Tile type of fracture, Injury Severity Score (ISS), and the time between injury to operation between the two groups (P>0.05). The qualities of fracture reduction according to the Matta criteria, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture reduction time, times of fluoroscopy, and System Usability Scale (SUS) score were recorded and compared. Results All operations were successfully completed in both groups. According to the Matta criteria, the qualities of fracture reduction were rated as excellent in 19 patients (95%) in trial group, which was better than that in the control group (13 cases, 65%), with a significant difference (χ2=3.906, P=0.048). The operative time and intraoperative blood loss had no significant differences between the two groups (P>0.05). The fracture reduction time and times of fluoroscopy were significantly less in trial group than in control group (P<0.05), and SUS score in trial group was significantly higher in trial group than in control group (P<0.05). ConclusionCompared to using unlocking closed reduction system under two-dimensional fluoroscopy, three-dimensional visible technique without fluoroscopy can significantly improve the reduction quality of unstable pelvic fractures without prolonging the operative time, and is valuable to reduce iatrogenic radiation exposure for patients and medical workers.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of HoloSight Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery Robot-assisted infra-acetabular screw placement for treatment of acetabular fractures. Methods The clinical data of 23 patients with acetabular fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation and infra-acetabular screw placement in two medical centers between June 2022 and October 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the the method of infra-acetabular screw placement, the patients were divided into navigation group (10 cases, using HoloSight Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery Robot-assisted screw placement) and freehand group (13 cases, using traditional X-ray fluoroscopy to guide screw placement). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, cause of injury, time from injury to operation, and Judet-Letournel classification between the two groups (P>0.05). The time of infra-acetabular screw placement, the fluoroscopy frequency, the guide pin adjustment times, the quality of screw placement, the quality of fracture reduction, and the function of hip joint were compared between the two groups. ResultsAll patients completed the operation successfully. The time of screw placement, the fluoroscopy frequency, and guide pin adjustment times in the navigation group were significantly less than those in the freehand group (P<0.05). The quality of screw placement in the navigation group was significantly better than that in the freehand group (P<0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 6-11 months, with an average of 7.7 months. There were 9 and 9 cases in the navigation group and the freehand group who achieved excellent and good fracture reduction quality at 1 week after operation, and 12 and 12 cases with excellent and good hip joint function at last follow-up, respectively, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The fractures in both groups healed well, and there was no significant difference in healing time (P>0.05). During the follow-up, there was no complication related to screw placement, such as failure of internal fixation, vascular and nerve injury, incisional hernia. ConclusionIn the treatment of acetabular fractures, compared with the traditional freehand screw placement, the HoloSight Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery Robot-assisted screw placement can reduce the time of screw placement, improve the accuracy of screw placement, and reduce the amount of radiation, which is an efficient, accurate, and safe surgical method.