ObjectiveTo investigate the application of three methods about digestive tract reconstruction in radical resection for proximal gastric cancer.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the cases of 130 proximal gastric cancer patients who underwent double tract reconstruction (TD, 35 cases), total gastrectomy (TG, 50 cases) and esophagogastrostomy (EG, 45 cases) from Jan. 2016 to Oct. 2018 in Gastrointestinal Surgery Department in our Hospital.ResultsThere were no significant differences in basic data of patients, preoperative nutritional status, hemoglobin content, postoperative recovery time of gastrointestinal function, hospitalization time and early postoperative complications among the three groups (P>0.05). But the operative time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative status of total protein, albumin, hemoglobin, late complications, reflux symptoms, gastro-intestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) between the three groups had statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The operative time of EG was (161.80±30.77) min, which was the shortest. The intraoperative bleeding volume of TG was (107.20±10.70) mL, which was the most. At 6 months after TG, the total protein, albumin and hemoglobin were (62.15±6.72) g/L, (36.14±6.57) g/L and (112.68±16.97) g/L, respectively, which were the lowest level among the three groups. There late complications of the EG were the most serious, in which the Visick score was 46 and the GIQLI index was 103.56±22.01. The above differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).ConclusionsDT performs better in anti-reflux, maintenance of postoperative nutrition, and anti-anemia, but the occurrence of remnant gastric cancer is a potential risk. TG has a lot of bleeding, as well as the performance of postoperative nutrition and anti-anemia is not good, but it can avoid the occurrence of remnant gastric cancer. The operative time of EG is short, but reflux symptoms are more likely to occur after surgery, and the quality of life is bad.