【摘要】 目的 比较在乳腺癌Auchincloss改良根治术中使用超声刀及电刀手术的优、缺点。 方法 2009年6月－2010年7月将176例乳腺癌患者通过信封法随机分为超声刀组和电刀组，每组88例，分别比较两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结检出数目、术后引流量、皮下积液及术后出血量的差异。 结果 手术时间:超声刀组为（145.72±50.76） min，电刀组为（171.27±66.68） min，两组差异有统计学意义（P=0.005）；术中出血量:超声刀组为（71.56±31.34） mL，电刀组为（84.99±36.39） mL，两组差异有统计学意义（P=0.009）；清扫出的淋巴结个数:超声刀组为（20.92±9.09）个，电刀组为（17.90±6.74）个，两组差异有统计学意义（P=0.013）。而在术后平均引流量和术后积液例数方面两组的差异无统计学意义（Pgt;0.05）。两组均无术后出血的情况。 结论 在乳腺癌Auchincloss改良根治术中使用超声刀，较单独使用电刀能缩短手术时间，减少出血量，并增加淋巴结检出的数量。【Abstract】 Objective To compare the disadvantages and advantages between modified radical mastectomy with harmonic scalpel (HS) and conventional electro-scalpel (ES) for patients with breast cancer. Methods Between June 2009 and July 2010, 176 patients with breast cancer were randomly divided into two groups including the HS group and the ES group. The operation time, intra-operative bleeding volume, the number of lymph nodes detected, postoperative drainage volume, subcutaneous hydrops, and postoperative hemorrhage volume between the two groups of patients were compared. Results There were significant differences between the HS and ES groups in terms of operation time [(145.72±50.76) minutes vs. (171.27±66.68) minutes, P=0.005], intra-operative bleeding volume [(71.56±31.34) mL vs. (84.99±36.39) mL, P=0.009], and number of lymph nodes detected (20.92±9.09 vs. 17.90±6.74, Plt;0.05). The postoperative drainage volume and subcutaneous hydrops were not significantly different between the two groups (Pgt;0.05). No postoperative hemorrhage occurred in both groups. Conclusion Compared with ES, the use of HS can reduce operation time and intra-operative bleeding volume, and increase the number of lymph nodes detected during modified radical mastectomy.
Objective To evaluate the feasibility, oncological safety, and aesthetic result of skin-spring mastectomy (SSM) or nipple-spring mastectomy (NSM) in breast reconstruction of implant (permanent gel or expander) for breast cancer patients who were not fit for the breast conserving surgery (BCS). Methods Between October 2005 and July 2011, 89 women with breast caner underwent SSM or NSM, with an average age of 42.4 years (range, 19-55 years) and an average disease duration of 5.7 months (range, 1-24 months). The pathological examination revealed invasive ductal carcinoma in 55 cases, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in 15 cases, invasive ductal carcinoma + DCIS in 8 cases, DCIS with infiltration in 10 cases, and occult breast cancer in 1 case. According to tumor staging criterion of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), 15 cases were rated as stage 0, 51 cases as stage I, 22 cases as stage II, and 1 case as unclear. Finally, 33 patients underwent SSM and 56 patients underwent NSM according to the location and diameter of tumor and the infiltration of tumor to nipple. Secondary breast reconstruction was performed with permanent gel replacement after axillary lymph node dissection in 9 patients with positive sentinel lymph node and 1 patient with occult breast cancer; immediate breast reconstruction was performed with permanent gel in the other patients. All the patients received the chemotherapy or/and radiotherapy according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline. Results Complications occurred in 5 patients undergoing breast reconstruction of permanent gel after NSM, including 1 case of haemorrhage, 2 cases of infection, and 2 cases of local skin necrosis. Primary healing of incision was obtained in the others. No nipple necrosis was observed in patients undergoing NSM. All the patients were followed up 14-88 months (median, 40 months). At 10 months after operation, the aesthetic results were excellent in 40 cases, good in 33 cases, fair in 14 cases, and poor in 2 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 82%. No recurrence or metastasis was found during follow-up. Conclusion The SSM or NSM is feasible and oncological safe for patients who are not fit for BCS, with satisfactory aesthetic result.