Objective To systematically review the effects of fenofibrate on kidney function in various populations, so as to provide references for selecting the methods of treating hyperuricemia. Methods Such databases as PubMed (1966-2013), EMbase (1984-2013), The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2012), CBM (1978-2013), and CNKI (1989-2013) were electronically searched for relevant randomized controlled trials or non-randomized controlled trials on fenofibrate for treating hyperuricemia. According to the Cochrane methods, two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 16 studies involving 346 patients were included in total. The results of meta-analysis showed that: a) compared with the control group, the fenofibrate group had the lower serum uric acid level (WMD=48.68, 95%CI 10.02 to 87.34, Plt;0.000 01), lower Ccr (endogenous creatinine clearance) level (WMD=8.88, 95%CI 1.29 to 16.47, P=0.002), and similar serum creatinine level (WMD=1.78, 95%CI –2.86 to 6.42, P=0.45); and b) adverse reaction included gastrointestinal discomforts, skin rashes and transient increase of GPT and transaminase, most of which were mild. Conclusion Fenofibrate has good effects. Due to the low quality of the included studies, the exact effectiveness and adverse reaction need to be rigorously verified based on more multi-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trials with large sample size.
Objective To systematically review the effectiveness and safety of cordyceps sinensis for chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD). Methods We electronically searched databases including CBM, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 7, 2013) and EMbase for randomized controlled trial (RCT) and quasi-RCTs on the effectiveness and safety of cordyceps sinensis for COPD. According to Cochrane methods, two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, assessed methodological quality. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. Results Fourteen quasi-RCTs involving 1 162 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: a) compared with routine treatment alone, cultured cordyceps sinensis in combination of routine treatment improved total effective rates (stationary stage: RR=1.33, 95%CI 1.14 to 1.54, P=0.000 3; advanced period: RR=1.36, 95%CI 1.14 to 1.62, P=0.000 8). Also cultured cordyceps sinensis in combination of routine treatment improved lung function (FEV1/FVC: MD=5.48, 95%CI 3.22 to 7.74, Plt;0.000 01; FEV1%: MD=3.75, 95%CI 0.91 to 6.59, P=0.010), and prolonged exercise duration (MD=43.51, 95%CI 27.66 to 59.36, Plt;0.000 01) for COPD patients in stationary stage. However, no evidence was found in blood gas analysis, immune function, and quality of life; and b) the results of one study showed that, cultured cordyceps sinensis in combination of routine treatment was comparable with immune regulator (BCG-PSY) in combination of routine treatment with regards to total effective rates, but it could better improve lung function of patients. Conclusion Current evidence suggests that cultured cordyceps sinensis is effective in treating COPD, especially in treating lung function and exercise duration of COPD patients in stationary stage and increasing total effective rates. However, the strength of evidence is affected by poor methodological quality of the included studies. High-quality trials with large sample size are needed to verify its clinical effects.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of topical fluoride on prevention of enamel demineralization during the orthodontic treatment in China. Methods The Cochrane Library（Issue 9, 2012), MEDLINE (1996 to 2012.10), EMbase (1974 to 2012.10), CNKI (1994 to 2012.10), VIP (1994 to 2012.10), WanFang data (1998 to 2012.10) and CBM (1978 to 2012.10) are searched for the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-Randomized controlled trials (qRCTs) about topical fluoride preventing enamel demineralization during the orthodontic treatment. The bibliographies of the included studies were searched, too. Two reviewers evaluated the quality of the included studies and extracted data critically and independently, and then the extracted data were analyzed using RevMan 5.2 software. Results A total of 20 studies within 19 articles were included, which involved 26 323 teeth. The results of meta-analysis results show that, the rate of enamel demineralization of the fluoride varnish group (8.4%) was lower than that of the control group (16.0%) (OR=0.44, 95%CI 0.33 to 0.59, Plt;0.000 01); the rate of enamel demineralization of the fluoride coating group (8.3%) was lower than that of the control group (17.7%) (OR=0.46, 95%CI 0.35 to 0.60, Plt;0.000 01); the rate of enamel demineralization of the fluoride toothpaste group (9.0%) was lower than that of the control group (14.5%) (OR=0.59, 95%CI 0.49 to 0.71, Plt;0.000 01); the rate of enamel demineralization of the fluoride foam group (11.6%) was lower than that of the control group (18.2%) (OR=0.48, 95%CI 0.24 to 0.96, P=0.04); the rate of enamel demineralization of other groups (12.0%) was lower than that of the control group (21.8%) (OR=0.43, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.60, Plt;0.000 01). Two outcomes were low quality in the GRADE system and the other three are very low quality. Conclusion Current domestic evidence shows that topical fluoride is effective to prevent enamel demineralization during the orthodontic treatment. However, given the low methodological quality of most included studies, this conclusion still needs to be further proved by conducting more strictly-designed, high-quality and large-scale studies.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different injection sites for collagenase chemonucleolysis for lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion (LIDP). Methods We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in the following electronic databases: Pubmed (1966 to May 2006), EMBASE(1966 to May 2006), The Cochrane library (Issue 2, 2006), CRD(Center for Reviews and Dissemination),York University, CBM (1978 to May 2006 ), CNKI(1994-2006)and VIP(1989-2006). Quality assessment and data extraction were conducted by two reviewers independently. Disagreement was resolved through discussion. Results Eight studies involving a total of 1035 participants met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was not carried out because of apparent heterogeneity. Four studies made comparisons among intradisc, extradisc, and combined intra- and extra-disc injection. One study (62 participants) showed that intradisc injection was superior to extradisc injection (RR 3.71, 95% CI 1.19 to 11.58, Plt;0.05). Another study (240 participants) showed that intradisc injection was superior to combined intra- and extra-disc injection after 3 months and 6 months of follow-up (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.98, Plt;0.05). The other two studies showed no significant difference among intradisc, extradisc, and combined intra- and extra-disc injection. Four studies (436 participants in total) showed that amongst three extradisc injections, both anterior epidural space injection and lateral epidural space injection were superior to posterior epidural space injection (Plt;0.05). Although one study indicated that anterior epidural space injection was superior to lateral epidural space injection (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.51, Plt;0.05), no statistical significance was found between anterior epidural space injection and lateral epidural space injection in two other studies (Pgt;0.05). Conclusions There is insufficient evidence to identify which injection site for collagenase is the most effective for lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion. The included studies showed that both anterior and lateral epidural space injection were superior to posterior epidural space injection. However, these studies are too small and poor quality, and have different diagnostic criteria, follow-up time points, outcome measures and efficacy parameters. Thus, more high quality and large-scale RCTs are needed.
Objective To review systematically whether there is enough existing evidence that methylcobalamin is effective and safe in the treatment of the patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.Methods A Cochrane systematic review of all relevant randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials of methycobalamin for diabetic peripheral neuropathy was performed. Clinical trials were searched from Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Issue 4, 2003), MEDLINE (January 1966 to January 2004), EMBASE (January 1980 to January 2004), the Chinese Biological Medicine Database (1978 to January 2004), the Chinese Science and Technology Journal Full-text Database (1989 to January 2004) and references of all included trials. The selection of studies, data extraction and assessment of methodological quality were performed independently by two reviewers. The following outcomes were assessed: effectiveness of clinical signs and symptoms, sensory nerve and motor nerve conduction velocities and serious adverse events of methylcobalamin. Results Thirty randomized clinical trials including 1 949 patients met the inclusion criteria. The quality of the most included trials was of low level. The "funnel plot" of the comparison of thirteen studies of methylcobalamin with other B Vitamins studies showed symmetry, which indicated less possible publication bias and the result was partly reliable, but it could not indicate the whole publication biases. The results of meta-analysis indicated that methylcobalamin showed significantly positive effects on the improvement of the signs and symptoms of peripheral neuropathy, and the effects were better than the other vitamin B agents. The increase of some nerves conduction velocities by methylcobalamin was better than by the other vitamin B. No serious adverse events were observed during the treatment period.Conclusions Methylcobalamin appears to be a safe and effective treatment on diabetic peripheral neuropathy. However, the evidence is not b because of the low quality of most trials. Rigorously designed, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials of methylcobalamin for diabetic peripheral neuropathy are needed to further assess the effect.
Objective To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Puerarin on diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Methods A systematic review and evaluation of all available relevant randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials of Puerarin for diabetic peripheral neuropathy from Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (150 issue of 2003), Medline (1966-2003. 2), EMbase (1984-2001. 12. 4), and the Chinese Biological Medicine Database (1978-2003. 2) were performed. The selection of studies, data extraction, and assessment of methodological quality were performed independently by two reviewers. The following outcomes were assessed: effectiveness of clinical symptoms, sensory nerve and motor nerve conduction velocities, and severe adverse events of Puerarin. Results Ten randomized controlled clinical trials including 726 patients met the inclusion criteria. At the end of the treatment, compared to general treatment or vitamin B, Puerarin showed significant positive effects on the total effect rate of therapy and increased peripheral nerve conduction velocity. No severe adverse events were observed during the treatment period. However, most included trials show some degree of study design or analysis defect. Conclusions Our analysis suggests that Puerarin appears to be an effective and safe treatment for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. However, due to the low quality trials included in this review, more rigorously designed, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of Puerarin for diabetic peripheral neuropathy are needed to further assess its usefulness in diabetes peripheral neuropathy patients.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of traditinal Chinese Medicine (TCM) syndrome classification and intervention for the prophylaxis of menstrual migraine. MethodsPatients consistent with the inclusion criteria from January 2013 to June 2014 were included in the trial. Patients were randomized by their visiting order into two groups:the experimental group was treated with Chinese traditional medicine compound decoctions (two doses for three days), and the control group was treated with vitamin B2 (400 mg once daily). The patients were treated for thirty days consecutively. Efficacy was assessed using the records of the frequency, duration, and severity of migraine attacks. Laboratory tests, vital signs, and adverse events were monitored. ResultsBoth treatments led to a significant reduction in the frequency, duration, and severity of migraine attacks (P<0.05). TCM therapy was significantly better than vitamin B2 for reducing the frequency and the duration of migraine (P<0.05). No serious adverse drug reaction was found in both groups. ConclusionTCM syndrome classification and intervention is effective and relatively safe in the prophylaxis of menstrual migraine attacks.