ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical, radiographic characteristics and differential diagnosis of pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis (PLCH) mimicking metastasis of cancer in radiography. MethodsClinical data of 2 patients with PLCH manifesting as metastatic cancer on HRCT and PET/CT were retrospectively analyzed. Patients reported as PLCH on WanFang Database, China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database and Pubmed were reviewed to screen misdiagnosis literature and further analyzed the clinical and radiographic characteristics. ResultsTwo cases both presented with cough and sputum. 18F-FDG PET/CT showed increased 18F-FDG up-take in both nodules in the lungs. One patient presented with multiple nodules, diffuse multiple cystic changes in lungs and osteoclasia in the right 4th rib on HRCT who was diagnosed by a video-assisted thoracoscopic biopsy of rib biopsy. The other patient presented with diffuse multiple nodules on HRCT who was diagnosed by a video-assisted thoracoscopic biopsy of lung biopsy. The pathological characteristics of both biopsy specimen demonstrated infiltration by Langerhans cells (LC) and eosinophils. The LC were positive for CD1a. Literature review found seven PLCH cases who were misdignosed as depression, eosinophilic pneumonia, interstitial lung disease involvement of autoimmune disorders and malignant tumor. ConclusionWhen clinician faced with a patient suspected as metastatic cancer by HRCT and PET/CT, it is reasonable to consider PLCH as a differential diagnosis and obtain the pathological information as soon as possible so that better prognosis can be achieved through early intervention.
Objective To evaluate the diagnosis value of temporal Done high-resolution computed tornography (HRCT) in cholesteatoma. Methods There were 30 causes that had received the mastoid surgery because of cholesteatoma. Each patient’s mastoid plain films (Schuller’s and Mayer’s ) and HRCT had been taken and compared with each other and surgical findings and evaluated with health economic evaluation methods. Results The sensitivity rate in diagnosing cholesteatoma with HRCF was much higher than that with mastoid film (Plt;0.005). The more important benefit with HRCT was that it can afford the detail information in ear such as the ossicular chain, facial nerve canal, tympanic sinus, etc. which were basis for otologist in surgery to remove the focus thoroughly and reconstruct the middle ear function at the same time. In the view of health economic evaluation, HRCT is also much better than mastoid X-ray film. Conclusion HRCT should replace masloid Schuller’s and Mayer’s film in diagnosis cholesteatoma and HRCT should use as ordinary examination in chronic otitis media.
治疗经前期综合症妇女的临床证据显示:①溴隐停(只对乳房症状):RCT所提供的有限证据提示,溴隐停的副作用虽然较常见,但与安慰剂相比对乳房胀痛的缓解更有效.②认知行为治疗:RCT发现,认知行为治疗较对照组能显著缓解经前期症状,但有关疗效大小的证据不足.③达那唑:RCT发现,达那唑较安慰剂能显著缓解经前期症状,但长期持续使用可能导致男性化等严重的副作用.④利尿剂:RCT发现,螺内酯较安慰剂能显著缓解乳房胀痛、水肿等症状.2个RCT发现,甲苯喹唑酮或氯化铵与安慰剂相比,能降低经前期水肿和抑制体重增加.⑤体育锻炼:1个RCT发现,有氧运动较安慰剂更能显著改善经前期症状.另1个RCT发现,高强度的有氧运动比低强度的有氧运动能更有效地缓解症状.⑥促黄体生成素释放激素类似物:RCT发现,促黄体生成素释放激素类似物(过去称GnRH类似物)较安慰剂能显著缓解经前期症状.RCT发现,促黄体生成素释放激素类似物+孕激素+雌激素(反向添加治疗)缓解症状的评分低于单用促黄体生成素释放激素类似物,但其评分优于安慰剂组.1个小样本RCT发现,促黄体生成素释放激素类似物+7-甲异炔诺酮缓解症状评分与单用促黄体生成素释放激素类似物相当.因为持续使用促黄体生成素释放激素类似物超过6个月将带来骨质疏松的危险,所以其长期使用受限.⑦子宫切除术伴或不伴双卵巢切除术:缺乏相关RCT.但观察性研究发现,子宫切除术伴双卵巢切除术具有治愈效果.只行子宫切除术也可缓解症状,但由于缺乏对照,导致证据强度有限.该疗法的危险主要是由手术造成的.双卵巢切除术后的不育也是不可逆的.⑧非选择5-羟色胺重摄取抑制剂--抗抑郁药/抗焦虑药:RCT发现,非选择性5-羟色胺重摄取抑制剂,包括抗抑郁药和抗焦虑药,较安慰剂能显著改善经前期综合症的至少一个症状,但部分妇女因副作用而中断治疗.有关β-阻滞剂和锂剂效果的RCT样本量太小,证据不足.⑨非甾体类抗炎药:一些RCT发现,前列腺素抑制剂较安慰剂能显著改善部分经前期症状,但不能缓解经前期乳房胀痛.⑩雌激素:一些小样本RCT的有限证据提示,雌激素较安慰剂能有效地改善症状,但有效程度尚不明确.(11)口服避孕药:RCT发现,口服避孕药较安慰剂改善经前期症状的证据不足.(12)孕酮:1个系统评价发现,孕酮可以小幅度缓解经前期综合症的所有症状且不增加由于副作用导致的治疗中断,其缓解程度与安慰剂有明显差异,但缓解的程度还达不到理想的临床疗效.目前尚不清楚给药的时间和途径对孕酮的作用是否有影响.(13)孕激素(人工合成):1个小样本RCT比较了孕激素和安慰剂的疗效,但证据不足.(14)Vit B6:1个纳入低质量RCT的系统评价发现,证实Vit B6疗效的证据不足.在这篇系统评价中,一些质量不高的RCT提示Vit B6较安慰剂能有效缓解症状,但另一些方法学质量不高的RCT发现,证实Vit B6效果的证据互有矛盾.(15)选择性5-羟色胺重摄取抑制剂:1篇系统评价和其后的RCT发现,选择性5-羟色胺重摄取抑制剂较安慰剂能显著缓解经前期症状,但也更易出现副反应.(16)7-甲异炔诺酮(替勃龙):1个小样本RCT的有限证据提示,替勃龙较安慰剂(复合维生素)更能缓解经前期症状.(17)其他治疗,如按摩疗法、饮食补充、子宫内膜切除术、月见草油、腹腔镜下行双卵巢切除术、反射论、放松疗法等的疗效证据不足.
Objectives The aim of the review was to assess the effectiveness of anti-reflux therapy for patients with hoarseness, in the absence of other identifiable causes, whether or not a definitive diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal and gastro-oesophageal reflux has been made. This was assessed by evaluation of prospective randomised controlled studies that were identified by a systematic review of the literature. Both medical and surgical treatments were evaluated. Method The Cochrane ENT Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to 2005), EMBASE (1974 to 2005) and conference proceedings were searched with prespecified terms. The date of the last search was September 2005.Randomised controlled trials recruiting patients with hoarseness in the absence of other identifiable causes, such as malignancy, cord palsy or nodules, whether or not a definitive diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal and gastro-oesophageal reflux has been made. Data collection and analysis Three reviewers examined the search results and identified studies before deciding which would be included in the review. Results 302 potential studies were identified by the search strategy. No trials were identified which met our inclusion criteria. Six randomised controlled trials were identified in which some, but not all patients presented with hoarseness, and were treated with proton pump inhibition. As we could not determine with certainty whether all these patients had hoarseness among the other laryngeal symptoms, these were excluded. However, these studies suggest a significant placebo response, which is comparable to the benefit derived from anti-reflux therapy in some studies. As no trials met our criteria, we are unable to reach any firm conclusions regarding the effectiveness of anti-reflux treatment for hoarseness. Conclusions There is a need for high quality randomised controlled trials to evaluate the effectiveness of anti-reflux therapy for patients with hoarseness which may be due to laryngopharyngeal and gastro-oesophageal reflux.
Objective To evaluate the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of traditional Chinese medicine published inChinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, and to analyze changes. Methods We searched CNKI to collect RCTs published inChinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine (CJITWM) in 2014. Reporting quality of RCTs was evaluated by using CONSORT 2010 checklist, the methodological quality and ethics requirements were also analyzed. The changes of quality was also analyzed by comparing with those of 2004. Results A total of 80 RCTs were included. The top three interventions were Chinese patent medicine, decoction, acupuncture. Items with high reporting rate (>80%) included abstract, participants, randomization sequences and informed consent. Items with reporting rate of 50% to 80% including introduction, interventions, harms and funding, and others were all less than 50%. Among them, the reporting quality of title, trial design, outcomes, sample size, type of randomization, allocation concealment, blinding, numbers analyzed, outcomes and estimation, generalizability, interpretation, registration and protocol was less than 10%. Compared with those of 2004, the quality of reporting, methodology, and ethics has all increased. Significant progress was made in items of structured summary, background and objectives, collecting participants, adverse reactions, quality control standards of TCM interventions, diagnostic evaluation criteria of TCM, follow-up, funding, ethical approval and informed consent. But small progress was made in randomization, allocation concealment and implementation, sample size, blinding and ITT. There has been no participant flow. Conclusion The quality of reporting, methodology, and ethics of RCTs published inChinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine have made some progress, however, trial design, outcomes selection, estimation of sample size, randomization, blinding, registration and participant flow are still needed to be further improved.
ObjectivesTo collect the methodology and original articles on the published cohort multiple randomized controlled trial (cmRCT), and evaluate the development and application of cmRCT.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, CNKI, WanFang Data and CBM databases were electronically searched to collect studies on cmRCT from inception to September 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies, then qualitative analysis was conducted.ResultsA total of 21 studies were enrolled, including 5 original studies and 16 methodology studies. The design of cmRCT was proposed in year 2010 and continuous progress was observed, including aspect of informed consent and statistical analysis, etc. This design has been mainly utilized for chronic diseases (oncology etc.) in Europe; most of these ongoing studies were unpublished. However, to our knowledge, there were none published Chinese original studies or protocols using cmRCT design.ConclusionscmRCT design has been continuously developed and applied since its introduction. This design can be considered in Chinese studies based on Chinese large cohorts to provide more evidence for disease prevention and treatment.
ObjectivesTo investigate the status of clinical trial registrations (CTRs), ethical reviews (ERs) and informed consent forms (ICFs) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which were published in the top 20 journals included by Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD), and evaluate the methodological quality of RCTs.MethodsWe selected top 20 high impact factor Chinese medical journals indexed by CSCD, the RCTs published between 2016 and 2017 were searched. The CTR, ER and ICFs for all RCTs were analyzed.ResultsA total of 395 RCTs were included for data analysis. Nineteen RCTs (4.8%) reported the information of registration. For the 4 traditional Chinese medicine journals, only 4 (1.9%) of 207 RCTs reported the registered information. For the 16 western medical journals, only 15 (8%) of 188 RCTs reported the registered information. There were 185 RCTs (46.8%) which reported the information of ethical review. Among them, 66 RCTs (31.9%) were published in traditional Chinese medical journals and 119 RCTs (63.3%) were published in western medical journals. There were 253 RCTs (64.1%) which reported the information of informed consent. Among them, 154 RCTs (74.4%) were published in Chinese medical journals and 199 RCTs (52.7%) were in western medical journals. In terms of methodology, approximately 299 RCTs (75.7%) reported the type of randomization where 60 RCTs (15.2%) reported the information of allocation concealment and 38 RCTs (59.6%) reported blinding.ConclusionsThe proportion of RCTs registration, ethical review and informed consent is still low and the methodological quality of the studies require to be improved. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the training of clinical trial methodology.
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of glimepiride for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods We searched the literature from PubMed, Ovid (All EBM Reviews), CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, CBM and other databases. Evaluating the quality of the study according to Cochrane systematic reviews, Meta-analysis was performed for the results of homogeneous studies by The Cochrane Collaboration’s software RevMan 5.0, and the heterogeneous data conducted a descriptive qualitative analysis. Results Six RCTs included in the analysis and Meta-analysis was not performed due to the insufficient data (for the median or standard deviation). Six RCTs are multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. The results showed that glimepiride groups to reduce glycosylated hemoglobin, lower fasting and postprandial blood glucose, postprandial plasma insulin enhance the efficacy were statistically significant differences (Plt;0.05) compared to placebo groups. Four studies informed the impact of fasting plasma insulin (FI) and 3 studies showed that the glimepiride groups improving the fasting plasma insulin (FI) were statistically significant differences (Plt;0.05), but 1 study showed the two groups had no significant difference (Pgt;0.05). All studies showed minor adverse reactions of glimepiride. Conclusion Glimepiride can reduce the glycosylated hemoglobin, lower the fasting and postprandial blood glucose, improve fasting and postprandial plasma insulin for type 2 diabetes patients, and have minor adverse reactions. In a word, glimepiride is an effective and security sulfonylureas drug.
Objictive To evaluate the efficacy of decompression with and without fusion in the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease. Methods We searched the Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to April, 2006), EMBASE (1984 to April, 2006), the China Biological Medicine Database (to Dec., 2005), VIP (1989 to April, 2006) and hand-searched several related journals for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized controlled trials (quasi-RCTs) involving the comparison of the outcomes between decompression with and without fusion in the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease. The quality of the included trials was assessed. RevMan 4.2.8 software was used for statistical analysis. Results Seven studies involving 412 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis indicated that no statistically significant differences were observed between the two operative procedures in the cumulative clinical outcome (OR1.83, 95%CI 0.92, 3.41), incidence of postoperative leg pain (OR 1.04, 95%CI 0.48, 2.25), incidence of perioperative complications (OR 1.15, 95%CI 0.51, 2.60), incidence of re-operation (OR 0.68, 95%CI 0.30, 1.56) or pre and postoperative pain scores [Pre-op WMD 0.12, 95%CI (-0.44,0.68); Post-op WMD 0.08, 95%CI (-1.08,1.25)]. The only statistical significance was observed in the incidence of postoperative back pain (OR 0.25, 95%CI 0.14, 0.46). Four studies described the length of operation, the intraoperative blood loss, the duration of external fixation postoperative and the total cost in hospital, which revealed that decompression alone was superior to decompression plus fusion. Three studies described the relationships between the clinical outcome and the changes in segmental range of motion/disc height pre- and post-operatively, as well as the flexion-extension radiographs, which revealed that decompression plus fusion was superior to decompression alone. Conclusions There are no significant differences between the two procedures in clinical outcomes, incidences of postoperative leg pain, re-operation and complications. Decompression with fusion leads to fewer patients suffering from postoperative lumbago than that of decompression alone. There is insufficient evidence to demonstrate that the radiographs may predict the clinical outcomes. More high quality, large-scale randomized controlled trials are required.