ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility, safety and accuracy of inserting a left atrial piezometer tube and pulmonary artery flotation catheter (PAFC)via the internal jugular vein (IJV)for postoperative monitoring of adult patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)after open cardiac surgery. MethodsA prospective study was conducted in 100 patients aged over 18 years who underwent open cardiac surgery in Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital from 2010 to 2012. There were 43 male and 57 female patients with their age of 46-65 (47±16)years. All the patients were divided into 2 groups, including 50 patients with severe PAH who underwent heart valve replacement (HVR)in group A, and 50 patients with mild to moderate PAH who underwent HVR in group B. All the patients received insertion of ARROW 5 Fr three-cavity catheter by piercing the atrial septum via IJV for continuous monitoring of left atrial pressure (LAP), and insertion of ARROW 8 Fr high-flow sheath for PAFC implantation via IJV in the same side. LAP and pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP)were continuously monitored after the patients entering the intensive care unit (ICU). The corelation and accuracy of LAP and PAWP were observed in the 2 groups. ResultsAll the patients successfully received continuous LAP and PAWP monitoring without serious catheter-related complications. There was no statistical difference in operation time or extracorporeal circulation time between group A and B (P > 0.05). There was statistical difference in postoperative mechanical ventilation time and length of ICU stay between the 2 groups (P < 0.05). Mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAPmean), mean LAP (LAPmean), mean PAWP (PAWPmean), and mean difference between PAWP and LAP (PAWP-LAPmean)of group A were significantly higher than those of group B (P < 0.01). PAWP was well correlated with LAP in both groups, and the correlation in group A was significantly milder than that in group B (P < 0.01). ConclusionIt is safe and feasible for LAP and PAFC monitoring via IJV after cardiac surgery. PAWP can not accurately reflect left ventricular preload, and LAP is more accurate to monitor left ventricular preload for patients with severe PAH.
ObjectiveTo explore the reason of failure in noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) for treatment of postoperative hypoxemia, in order to better guide use of NPPV after cardiac surgery. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 64 patients after heart surgery with undergoing NPPV treatment due to hypoxemia in our hospital between January 2012 and December 2013 year.There were 49 males and 15 females at age of 28 to 87 years. There were 17 patients with NPPV failure. The related factors for failure of NPPV were analyzed. ResultsFactors associated with failure of NPPV included smoking history, preoperative pulmonary function abnormalities, blood transfusion amount > 1 000 ml, simplified acute physiology score Ⅱ(SAPS Ⅱ) before NPPV > 35 points, oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) < 100 mm Hg before NPPV, PaO2/FiO2 < 150 mm Hg after NPPV treatment for 1 h, mechanical ventilation time > 72 h at the first time, and pneumonia (P < 0.05). The SAPS Ⅱ > 35 points before NPPV and pneumonia were the independent risk factors for NPPV treatment failure for postoperative hypoxemia. ConclusionPostoperative NPPV for heart disease should be according to the cause of low oxygen and severity. For patients with SAPS less than 35 points before NPPV or patients with pneumonia, NPPV should not be used. In the process of NPPV, if clinical effect is not satisfied, it should be converted to invasive ventilation immediately.
ObjectiveTo summarize the experience of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) application on coronary artery bypass grafting（CABG）during perioperative period. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the data of 82 patients undergoing simple CABG operation in Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital between January 2011 and December 2013. There were 50 male and 32 female patients at age of 49-75 (63.6±11.5) years. The patients were divided into three groups including a group A (12 patients, preoperative-placed IABP), a group B(39 patients , postoperative active placed IABP), and a group C (31 patients, postoperative passive placed IABP). The clinical effects of the three groups were compared. ResultsThere were significantly statistic differences in sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score after postoperative 48 hours, ventilator supporting time, IABP supporting time, catecholamine drug usage time, infection incidence, incidence of ventricular arrhythmia, ICU retention time, postoperative hospital stay, CBP usage rate, and postoperative mortality (P<0.05) among the three groups with worse effect in the group C. ConclusionTaking IABP support during CABG perioperative period is an effective treatment. Preventively preoperative and actively postoperative placing IABP can improve the treatment effects significantly. Therefore, patients should apply CABG as soon as possible without hesitation when IABP indications occur.