Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Polyunsaturated phosphatidylcholine (PPC) for chronic hepatitis. Methods We searched EMBASE (1980May,2003), MEDLINE(1966May,2003), CBM (1979May,2003), The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2003 and handsearched 8 related Chinese journals. Randomized controlled trials(RCT) comparing PPC versus placebo/no treatment for chronic hepatitis were included with no restrictions of blinding, language and publication. Two reviewers independently performed data extraction and assessed the quality . Data were entered and analyzed by RevMan 4.2 software supplied by the Cochrane Collaboration .Results Six high quality trials involving 568 patients were included. Four studies involving 451 patients showed the clinical effective rate of PPC for chronic hepatitis was 52.5% while the control group was 37.5% with statistical difference [RR1.81,95%CI(1.41,2.33),Z=4.69, Plt;0.00001].A meta-analysis involving three studies with 100 patients showed the PPC can statically improve histopathology of chronic hepatitis comparing with control group [RR 2.58,95%CI (1.61,4.15),Z=3.91,Plt;0.0001].No serious adverse events were reported.Conclusions PPC is a safe medicine used for treating chronic viral hepatitis and may relieve clinical symptoms and signs.At the same time ,it has positive effect on hepatic histopathology for patients .However ,more high quality clinical trials are required.
目的 评价不同复苏方法和不同药物、氧疗、物理疗法等对新生儿窒息复苏和复苏后的预防措施的有效性和安全性.方法 计算机检索Cochrane Library(2004年第3期),MEDLINE(1966～2002年) 关于新生儿窒息复苏时不同复苏方法、氧气的应用、以及不同药物、剂量、给药途径治疗和预防新生儿窒息的系统评价、随机和半随机对照试验.结果 正压通气时使用100%氧气和应用室内空气的复苏效果并无差异.胎粪污染羊水(MSAF)与较高的新生儿缺血缺氧性脑病(HIE)的发生率有关,而气管内有胎粪者无论稀稠均与胎粪吸入综合征发生率无关.窒息复苏后预防性给予亚低温疗法、抗惊厥药、纳洛酮、多巴胺等在降低新生儿病死率,继发HIE的严重程度等方面与对照组相比无显著差异.应用肺表面活性物质(PS)预防和治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS),可减少死亡率和并发症.结论 应用PS预防和治疗RDS可明显减少新生儿死亡率,且胎龄lt;32周的早产儿预防用药比治疗用药效果更好;目前尚无充分证据证明窒息复苏后预防性给予亚低温疗法、抗惊厥药、纳洛酮、多巴胺等治疗的有效性.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the impact of side-to-side esophagogastric anastomosis on postoperative anastomostic leak, fibrosis stricture and stroesophageal reflux. MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 4 2015), Web of Science, CNKI, CBM, Wanfang Database and VIP up to April 2015. Randomized controlled trials involving the complications after side-to-side esophagogastric anastomosis were included. Data were extracted and methodological quality was evaluated by two reviewers independently with a designed extraction form. Then RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. ResultsA total of 7 studies involving 684 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that comparing with traditional anastomosis, side-to-side esophagogastric anastomosis could reduce the incidence of fibrosis stricture with RR=0.20 and 95% CI 0.11 to 0.36 (P<0.000 01). There was no statistical difference in incidence of postoperative anasotmostic leaks with RR=0.71 and 95% CI 0.43 to 1.19 (P=0.19) or stroesophageal reflux with RR=0.74 and 95% CI 0.50 to 1.11 (P=0.15) between the two groups. ConclusionComparing with traditional anastomosis, side-to-side esophagogastric anastomosis could reduce the incidences of fibrosis stricture, but there is no statistical difference in anastomostic leak or stroesophageal reflux.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection in treating viral hepatitis.Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and CNKI from 1978 to June 2007. We identified randomized control led trials of Kai Shi injection versus other medicines or blank controlin treating viral hepatitis. The quality of included trials was evaluated independently by two reviewers. Meta-analyses were performed with The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.7 software. Results Fourteen studies involving 1 218 patients were included, one of these compared lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection versus Mai Anding injection, one compared lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection versus potassium-magnesium aspartate injection, and the other 12 compared Lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection versus blank control. Allincluded studies were assessed in terms of randomization, allocation concealment and blinding; and all were graded C(poor quality). Meta-analyses showed that, the total effective rate was significantly higher in the lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection group[RR 1.45, 95%CI (1.29, 1.63)] and the mortality was lower[RR 0.66, 95%CI (0.53, 0.83)] compared with the blank control group, but the incidence of phlebitis was significantlyhigher [RR 7.70, 95%CI (2.57, 23.07)]. There was no significant di f ference between Mai Anding inject ion and lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection in the total effective rate, but Lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection was more effective in improving patients’ liver functions. Compared with potassium-magnesium aspartate injection, the total effective rate was significantly higher in the lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection group[RR1.54, 95%CI (1.14, 2.08)].Conclusion The evidence currently available shows that the effectiveness and safety of lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection are not significantly different from those of Mai Anding injection for patients with viral hepatitis. Compared with potassium-magnesium aspartate injection, Lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection could significantly improve the total effective rate, but since we only include 1 relevant randomized trials, the strength of this evidence is weak. When compared with the blank control, Lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection significantly improved the total effective rate, decreased mortality but increased the incidence of side effects and the existing evidence is insufficiant to show whether Lipo-prostaglandin E1 injection improves patients’ liver functions.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab combined with STUPP regimen for newly diagnosed glioblastoma.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, the Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data databases were searched to obtain randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of bevacizumab combined with STUPP regimen for newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients from inception to September 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 6 RCTs involving 2 835 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: the bevacizumab combined with STUPP regimen group was superior to the control group on PFS (HR=0.69, 95%CI 0.62 to 0.77, P<0.000 01). But the adverse events rate at the three and above three levels was significantly higher than the control group (P<0.05).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that bevacizumab combined with STUPP regimen for newly diagnosed glioblastoma can significantly prolong the PFS. The treatment group performs not as well as the control group on adverse event rate. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
Objective To determine the efficiency and safety of dexmedetomidine in general anesthesia. Methods Trials were located through electronic searches of the PubMed, EBSCO, OVID, Springer, Foreign Journals Integration System, CNKI, CMBdisk (from the date of establishment of the databases to April 2008). Bibliographies of the retrieved articles were also checked. Result A total of 25 trials involving 1 241 patients were included. The Meta-analysis showed: dexmedetomidine reduced peri-operative heart rate and blood pressure, reduced the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomitting [RR=0.57, 95%CI (0.38, 0.84)], postoperative agitation [RR=0.29, 95%CI (0.17, 0.51)], shivering [RR=0.45, 95%CI (0.29, 0.68)], increase the occurrence of bradycardia [RR=2.16, 95%CI (1.58, 2.95)], hypotension [RR=2.97, 95%CI (1.42, 6.18)]. Dexmedetomidine reduced administration of thiopental, isoflurane and fentanyl, while there was no difference in muscle relaxant. Dexmedetomidine showed no difference in emergency time compared with the control group. As a result of low incidence of adverse reaction, dexmedetomidine showed superior in discharge time [WMD15.17, 95%CI (3.87, 26.46)]. Conclusions The limited current evidence shows that dexmedetomidine is better in maintaining the hemodynamic balance; reducing occurrence of nausea, vomiting, agitation and shivering; and reducing doses of anesthetics. In emergency time, dexmedetomidine shows no difference except discharge time.
ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of compound flumetasone ointment for neurodermatitis and chronic eczema. MethodsWe searched the Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMbase, CBM, CNKI and Wanfang Data to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of compound flumetasone ointment for neurodermatitis and chronic eczema; the retrieval time started from founded date to December 2012. The language was confined to English and Chinese. We performed meta-analyses using the Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.0 Software. ResultsA total of 22 RCTs involving 2 049 patients with neurodermatitis and chronic eczema were included and assessed. At the end of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th week, the efficacy of topical compound flumetasone ointment (or combined with oral antihistamines) was obviously higher than that of other topical corticosteroid preparations[RR=1.39, 95%CI(1.30, 1.50), P<0.000 01; RR=1.25, 95%CI(1.15, 1.37), P<0.000 01; RR=1.21, 95%CI(1.11, 1.33), P<0.000 1]. Only temporary and slight adverse effects, such as erythema, desquamation, burning and tingling were observed, whereas no serious adverse effects were reported. ConclusionThe limited evidence demonstrates that topical compound flumetasone ointment (or combined with oral antihistamines) is safe and efficient. More large sampled and multiple central RCTs are required to verify these conclusions owing to the limitations of the present study.
Multicenter randomized controlled studies can recruit more subjects in a relatively short period of time, avoiding the bias of single research institution studies, resulting in reliable conclusions and providing strong guidance to clinical practice. They are the most scientific and most reliable methods to evaluate clinical researches. However, there are few multicenter clinical trials in China as Chinese doctors are often trapped in difficulties in clinical research, including imperfect research system, lack of experience, capital investment deficient, the tension in the doctor-patient relationship and so on. Although the above problems are related to medical system architecture of our country in a certain extent, compared with the overseas, we also have our own advantages, such as resource of our patients, doctors, and diseases type. Pay attention to discovering of new type of diseases, looking for genetics discipline, and exploring new medical technology is an important task of clinical research. We have plenty of high level ophthalmology centers at present, which provide favorable conditions for launching multi-center clinical trial studies. We have good reasons to believe that, if we can effectively exploit the resources in our hands, carefully observe and discover clinical problems, there will be more convincing clinical results present in the world after bring up hypothesis boldly while prove it conscientiously and carefully.
Objective To determine the effect of closed tracheal suction system versus open tracheal suction system on the rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults. Methods We searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2007), PubMed (1966 to 2006) and CBM (1980 to 2007), and also hand searched relevant journals. Randomized controlled trials involving closed tracheal suction system versus open tracheal suction system for ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults were included. Data were extracted and the quality of trials was critical assessed by two reviewers independently. The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.8 software was used for data analyses. Result Five randomized controlled trials involving 739 patients were included. Results of meta-analyses showed that compared to open tracheal suction system, closed tracheal suction system did not increase the rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia (RR 0.83, 95%CI 0.50 to 1.37) or case fatality (RR 1.05, 95%CI 0.85 to 1.31). No significant differences were observed between open tracheal suction system and closed tracheal suction system in the total number of bacteria (RR 0.83, 95%CI 0.50 to 1.37), the number of SPP colony (RR 2.87, 95%CI 0.94 to 8.74) and the number of PSE colony (RR 1.46, 95%CI 0.76 to 2.77). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the duration of ventilation and length of hospital stay. Conclusion Open or closed tracheal suction systems have similar effects on the rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia, case fatality, the number of SPP and PSE colonies, duration of ventilation and length of hospital stay. However, due to the differences in interventions and statistical power among studies included in this systematic review, further studies are needed to determine the effect of closed or open tracheal suction systems on these outcomes.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of foscarnet sodium in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMbase, The Cochrane Library and CNKI from 1978 to June 2006. Randomized controlled trials of foscarnet sodium versus other drugs or no drugs in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B were identified. The quality of the included trials was evaluated by two reviewers independently. Meta-analysis was done using The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.7. Results Seven studies (337 patients) were included; one compared foscarnet sodium versus interferon, and the other six compared foscarnet sodium versus no drugs. All the included studies were graded in terms of the quality of randomization, allocation concealment and blinding. All 7 studies were graded as level C. The meta-analysis showed that: ① foscarnet sodium was not significantly different from interferon in clinical efficacy, liver function, negative-conversion rate of virological markers and side effects. ② compared with the no drugs group, the negative-conversion rate of virological markers was significantly higher for the foscarnet sodium group, HBeAg (RR 6.20, 95%CI 1.76 to 21.79) and HBV-DNA (RR 4.13, 95%CI 1.32 to 12.86); but there were no significant differences in clinical efficacy, liver function and side effects. Conclusions Available evidence shows that: in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B the effectiveness and safety of foscarnet sodium are not significantly different from interferon, but only one trial is included in this review, so the evidence is weak. Compared with no drugs, foscarnet sodium significantly improves the negative-conversion rate of virological markers, but the evidence is insufficient to show whether foscarnet sodium could improve clinical efficacy and liver function, as well as reduce side effects.