Objective To evaluate the diagnosis of blue-on-yellow perimetry and macular threshold perimetry in early primary glaucoma. Methods Humphrey II 750 automatic perimetry was used to test 60 eyes of 60 cases in normal control group and 63 eyes of 63 cases in early primary glaucoma group with white-on-white perimetry (W/W), blue-on-yellow perimetry (B/Y)，and macular threshold perimetry (M TP). The results of the visual field defects detected by the three perimetries were compared and analyzed.Results The differences of mean sensibility of W/W, B/Y and MTP between the two groups had statistical significance［t=-3 .01, P=0.0054 (W/W); t=-2.95, P=0.006 3 (B/Y); t=-2.59,P=0. 0150 (MTP)］. In the diagnosis of early primary glaucoma, the sensitivity of MTP was the highest (83%), B/Y was the second (65%), and W/W was the lowest (48%). When B/Y and MTP were combined, the sensitivity was improved to 94% using parallel testing, and the specificity was improved to 87% using serial testing.Conclusions B/Y and MTP are valuable in diagnosis of early primary glaucoma, and the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis can be improved when B/Y and MTP are combined. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis，2003，19：102-105)
ObjectiveTo probe the classification of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and the different grade of diabetic and type of macular edema according to fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA). MethodsFFA was performed on 1 058 patients (2 097 eyes) to classify DR and macular edema with the analysis of duration of DM, visual acuity, manifestation of FFA images and results of ophthalmoscopic examination.ResultsIn 2 097 eyes, there were 124 (5.9%) without DR, 396 (18.9%) with DR I, 430 (20.5%) with DR II, 563 (26.8%) with DR III, 262 (125%) with preproliferative diabetic retinopathy (PPDR), 254 (12.%) with DR IV, 60 (2.9%) with DR V, and 8 (0.4%) with DR VI. In 2 097 eyes there were 819 (39.1%) with macular edema, including 311 (38%) with focal macular edema, 322 (39.3%) with diffused macular edema, 112 (13.7%) with cystoid macular edema, 25 (3.1%) with ischemia macular edema, and 49 (6.0%) with proliferative macular edema.ConclusionWith the analysis of the results of FFA of 2 097 eyes, we classify DR in stage Ⅰ (primary stage Ⅰ and Ⅱ), Ⅱ (primary stage Ⅲ), Ⅲ (preproliferative diabetic retinopathy), Ⅳ,Ⅴ, and Ⅵ; classify macular edema of DR in focal, diffused, cystoid, ischemic, and proliferating ones.(Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2003,19:333-337)
Objective To evaluate the variability of four parameters of multi-focal electroretinogram (mERG) a-wave amplitude, b-wave amplitude, awave latent period, b-wave latent period. Methods Sixty normal eyes of 46 volunteers were divided into 3 groups of different ages. RETIscan 3-12 system was used to carry out mERG examination. The stimulus matrix of 61 hexagonal elements spanning the central 24deg;of the visual field. These hexons were scaled with eccentricity and divide d into 5 rings. First-order kernel was selected. Results The variability of four parameters of mERG was great. The variability of b-wave latent period was the smallest, its coefficient of variatian was 4.52%～15.62%；that of a-wave latent period held the second place:10.29%~48.67%；that of b-wave amplitude was greater:25.92%~76.11%；that of a-wave amplitude was the greatest:43.82%~88.23%. The results of three groups showed that b-wave amplitude of ring 1 had the smallest variability. Conclusions The variability of latent period is smaller than that of amplitude; the variability of b-wave was smaller than that of a-wave. The longer the centrifugal distance, the lower the amplitude density of a-wave and b-wave. Physiological and anatomical factors might be important for the variability of parameters of multi-focal electroretinogram. (Chin J Ocul Fundus Dis, 2001,17:277-279)