Objective To investigate the effectiveness of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction with remnant preservation and autogenous quadrupled hamstring tendons under arthroscopy. Methods Between October 2007 and August 2012, 32 patients with PCL rupture were treated and followed up for more than 1 year. There were 24 males and 8 females, aged 20-53 years (mean, 35.6 years). The causes of injury included traffic accident injury in 21 cases, sports injury in 8 cases, and falling injury from height in 3 cases. The disease duration ranged 1 week to 2 years (median, 6.3 weeks). Nine patients had simple PCL rupture, 23 patients complicated by ligament injury, including 10 cases of anterior cruciate ligament rupture, 11 cases of posterolateral corner injury, and 2 cases of posteromedial corner injury. Preoperative Lysholm score was 53.8 ± 7.1. According to the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) rating criteria, 10 cases were classified as grade C and 22 cases as grade D. PCL was reconstructed with autogenous quadrupled hamstring tendons, the tendons were fixed with EndoButton at the femoral side and with interference screw at the tibial side; floats of stump were cleaned up, and the structural stability and continuity ligament remnants were preserved. Results Primary healing was obtained in all incisions; no early complication occurred after operation. Thirty-two patients were followed up 23.4 months on average (range, 12-36 months). All patients had no symptom of knee instability; the results of tibia sags sign, posterior drawer test, and Lachman test were negative. At last follow-up, the knee range of motion (ROM) returned to normal in all cases. The Lysholm score was 92.3 ± 2.0, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative score (t= — 34.32, P=0.00). According to the IKDC rating criteria, 26 cases were classified as grade A and 6 cases as grade B at last follow-up, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative grade (Z= — 5.57, P=0.00). Conclusion Arthroscopic single-bundle reconstruction of PCL with remnant preservation and quadrupled hamstring tendons has advantages of minimal trauma, simple operation, and good knee function recovery.
ObjectiveTo compare the recovery of proprioception of the knee after the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with remnant preservation or not. MethodsBetween January 2010 and October 2012, 40 patients with ACL rupture were divided into remnant preservation reconstruction group (trial group, n=20) and traditional reconstruction group (control group, n=20). There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, injury causes, preoperative Lysholm scores, and preoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores between 2 groups (P>0.05). All the patients received ACL single-bundle reconstruction surgery with autologous hamstring tendon transplantation under arthroscope. After operation, the function of knee was assessed by Lysholm and IKDC scores and the proprioception was assessed by joint position sense (JPS) value which was evaluated by passive repeat angle test with isokinetic test system. ResultsAll incisions healed by first intention in 2 groups. The patients were followed up 12-16 months (mean, 14.0 months) in trial group, and 12-15 months (mean, 14.5 months) in control group. At 12 months after operation, the Lysholm and IKDC scores were significantly increased when compared with preoperative scores (P<0.05) in both groups, but no significant difference was found between 2 groups (P>0.05). At 3 months and 12 months after operation in trial group, the JPS values of operated knee at 15, 45, and 75° of flexion were significantly lower than preoperative values (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between at 3 months and at 12 months after operation (P>0.05). At 3 months after operation in control group, there was no significant difference (P>0.05) in JPS values of operated knee at 15, 45, and 75° of flexion when compared with preoperative ones; but at 12 months after operation in control group, the JPS values of operated knee at 15, 45, and 75° of flexion were significantly lower than those at preoperation and at 3 months after operation (P<0.05). At 3 months after operation, the JPS of operated knee at 15, 45, and 75° of flexion in trial group were significantly lower than those of operated knee in control group (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between 2 groups at 12 months after operation (P>0.05). At 3 and 12 months after operation in trial group, there was no significant difference (P>0.05) in JPS values at 15, 45, and 75° of flexion between operated and normal knees; at 3 months after operation in control group, the JPS values of operated knee at 15, 45, and 75° of flexion were significantly higher than those of normal knee, but there was no significant difference between operated knee and normal knee at 12 months after operation (P>0.05). ConclusionACL reconstruction with remnant preservation is helpful for recovery of proprioception in knee joint at early stage.
ObjectiveTo investigate the value of ligament remnant preservation during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction by observing the integrity, the tension, the synovial membrane covering, and the color of the reconstructed ligament under arthroscopy. MethodsBetween January 2011 and December 2013, 122 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction and arthroscopic internal fixation removal at 1 year after reconstruction were included in this study. Of these cases, 61 cases underwent ACL reconstruction using the remnant-preserved technique (preservation group);the other 61 cases underwent ACL reconstruction using non remnant-preserved technique (non preservation group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, injury side, body mass index, type of injury, the time from injury to reconstruction, and the result of KT-2000 examination between 2 groups (P<0.05). The reconstructed ACL were observed under arthroscopy when internal fixation was removed, and the effectiveness was evaluated according to the criteria of AO Yingfang. ResultsIn preservation group, the results were excellent in 34 cases, good in 22 cases, fair in 4 cases, and poor in 1 case;and in non preservation group, the results were excellent in 29 cases, good in 20 cases, fair in 10 cases, and poor in 2 cases;and there was no significant difference between 2 groups (Z=-1.320, P=0.187). ConclusionIn ACL reconstruction, the remnant-preserved technique is not obviously better than non remnant-preserved technique in the integrity, tension, membrane covering, and color.