Objective To compare the effects of rivaroxaban and enoxaparin on hidden blood loss after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods A retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 76 patients (93 hips) with avascular necrosis of the femoral head who underwent primary THA between June 2009 and January 2012. After operation, 10 mg rivaroxaban was used at 6-10 hours for 14 days in 44 cases (54 hips) (rivaroxaban group) and 4 000 U enoxaparin at 12 hours for 14 days in 32 cases (39 hips) (enoxaparin group). There was no significant difference in age, gender, weight, height, disease duration, grade of avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and lesion hips between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The total blood loss, dominant blood loss, hidden blood loss, and percentage of hidden blood loss were calculated according to the formula. The bleeding events were recorded within 35 days after operation. Results The total blood loss was (1 509.56 ± 325.23) mL; the dominant blood loss was (928.09 ± 210.50) mL; the hidden blood loss was (581.47 ± 215.01) mL; and the percentage of hidden blood loss was 37.88% ± 10.42% in the rivaroxaban group. The total blood loss was (1 521.38 ± 516.49) mL; the dominant blood loss was (917.50 ± 378.73) mL, the hidden blood loss was (603.88 ± 377.15) mL, and the percentage of hidden blood loss was 38.18% ± 18.33% in the enoxaparin group. There was no significant difference in the above indicators between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The incidence of bleeding event was 9.1% (4/44) in the rivaroxaban group and was 3.1% (1/32) in the enoxaparin group, showing no significant difference (χ2=1.073, P=0.390). Conclusion There is no significant difference in the risk of hidden blood loss and incidence of bleeding event for primary THA between the rivaroxaban and the enoxaparin use.
Objective To investigate the effect of rivaroxaban on the risk of bleeding after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods A total of 119 cases undergoing primary TKA because of knee osteoarthritis between June 2009 and May 2011, were randomly divided into the rivaroxaban group (59 cases) and the control group (60 cases). There was no significant difference in gender, age, height, weight, side, disease duration, and grade of osteoarthritis between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Thepreoperative preparation and operative procedure of 2 groups were concordant. At 1-14 days after TKA, rivaroxaban 10 mg/d were taken orally in the rivaroxaban group, and placebo were given in the control group. The blood routine examination was performed before operation and at 2 days postoperatively; the total blood loss and hemoglobin (HGB) decrease were calculated according to the formula; the blood loss, postoperative wound drainage, and wound exudate after extubation were recorded to calculate the dominant amount of blood loss; and the bleeding events were recorded within 35 days postoperatively. Results The total blood loss and HGB decrease were (1 198.34 ± 222.06) mL and (33.29 ± 4.99) g/L in the rivaroxaban group and were (1 124.43 ± 261.01) mL and (31.57 ± 6.17) g/L in the control group, showing no significant difference (P gt; 0.05); the postoperative dominant blood loss in the rivaroxaban group [(456.22 ± 133.12) mL] was significantly higher than that in the control group [(354.53 ± 96.71) mL] (t=4.773, P=0.000). The bleeding events occurred in 3 cases (5.1%) of the rivaroxaban group and in 1 case (1.7%) of the control group, showing no significant difference (χ2=1.070, P=0.301). Conclusion Rivaroxaban has some effects on the risk of bleeding after TKA. In general, rivaroxaban is safe.
Objective To systematically assess the therapeutic effect of rivaroxaban and enoxaparin on preventing deep venous thrombosis after major orthopedic operation. Methods Such databases as MEDLINE, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2009), Current Controlled Trials, The National Research Register, CBM, and CNKI were searched from their establishment to December 2009 in whatever language. Related journals were handsearched as well. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of comparing therapeutic effects of rivaroxaban and enoxaparin on preventing deep venous thrombosis after major orthopedic operation were included. Data were extracted and their quality was evaluated, and meta-analyses were conducted by using RevMan 5.0.25 software. Results Seven RCTs with 15 458 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that compared with enoxaparin, rivaroxaban reduced the end risk of the primary efficacy to 60% (RR=0.40, 95%CI 0.28 to 0.57, Plt;0.000 01) and reduced the end risk of the main secondary efficacy to 71% (RR=0.29, 95%CI 0.15 to 0.56, Plt;0.000 01), and the end risk of other efficacy to 56% (RR=0.44, 95%CI 0.29 to 0.66, Plt;0.000 01). During the treatment, rivaroxaban and enoxaparin displayed similarity in terms of the incidence of serious bleeding events (RR=1.16, 95%CI 0.68 to 1.999, P=0.59) and the secondary safety endpoint. Conclusion Rivaroxaban is effective in preventing deep venous thrombosis after major orthopedic operation and can significantly reduce the risk of postoperative deep vein thrombosis.
ObjectiveTo compare the effect on blood loss after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between rivaroxaban and enoxaparin. MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 107 patients (121 knees) with osteoarthritis undergoing primary TKA between January 2010 and October 2012. According to different perioperative anticoagulants, the patients were divided into the rivaroxaban group (51 cases, 57 knees) and the enoxaparin group (56 cases, 64 knees). There was no significant difference in gender, age, height, weight, body mass index, osteoarthritis classification, and disease duration between 2 groups (P>0.05). The total blood loss, hidden blood loss, dominant blood loss, and the percentage of hidden blood loss were compared between 2 groups. The bleeding events were recorded within 35 days after operation. ResultsThe dominant blood loss of enoxaparin group was significantly higher than that of rivaroxaban group (t=3.025, P=0.003), but the percentage of hidden blood loss of enoxaparin group was significantly lower than that of rivaroxaban group (t=4.361, P=0.000); no significant difference was found in the total blood loss and hidden blood loss between 2 groups (P>0.05). The incidence of bleeding event in rivaroxaban group (15.69%; including 1 case of incision bleeding, 4 cases of melena, and 3 cases of haematuria) was significantly higher than that in enoxaparin group (3.57%; including 1 case of haematuria and 1 case of melena) (χ2=4.624, P=0.032). ConclusionRivaroxaban does not increase the risk of hidden blood loss for TKA when compared with enoxaparin, but enoxaparin can increase the risk of dominant blood.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban for prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients with preoperative abnormal D-dimer after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MethodsBetween August and September 2013,60 consecutive patients with varus knee osteoarthritis undergoing unilateral TKA were enrolled in the study.According to the preoperative D-dimer level,the patients were divided into 2 groups:D-dimer normal group (control group,n=41) and D-dimer abnormal group (test group,n=19).No significant difference was found in gender,age,body mass index,and preoperative knee range of motion between 2 groups (P>0.05).All patients underwent conventional primary TKA and anticoagulation therapy with rivaroxaban to prevent DVT.The tourniquet use time,postoperative hospitalization time,and total hospitalization time were compared between 2 groups.At 1,3,and 5 days after operation,prothrombin time (PT),activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT),thrombin time (TT),fibrinogen (FIB),and D-dimer were measured.Wound complications and DVT were observed. ResultsThe postoperative hospitalization time of the test group was significantly longer than that of the control group (t=2.327,P=0.031),while the tourniquet use time and total hospitalization time showed no significant difference between 2 groups (P>0.05).All the patients were followed up 6-8 months (mean,7.2 months).Wound complications occurred in 3 cases (7.3%) of the control group and in 2 cases (10.5%) of the test group,showing no significant difference (χ2=0.175,P=0.676).Color ultrasonography showed no pulmonary embolism and DVT at 6 weeks after TKA.There were significant differences in PT,TT,and FIB between at pre- and post-TKA in the same group,but no significant difference was found between 2 groups.The APTT and D-dimer had significant differences between at pre- and post-TKA in the same group,and between groups.There was no significant interaction effect between time and group for each index. ConclusionPreoperative abnormal D-dimer level should not be regarded as a contraindication for TKA.The risks of DVT and wound complications in patients with abnormal D-dimer level are similar to patients with normal D-dimer level using rivaroxaban administration after TKA.It is unnecessary to conventional monitor D-dimer and other coagulation and hemorrhage laboratory tests in the patients after TKA.
Objective To explore clinical effect and safety of rivaroxaban in treatment of acute pulmonary thromboembolism at moderate risk with deep vein thrombosis of lower limbs. Methods The clinical data of 60 patients with acute pulmonary thromboembolism at moderate risk with deep vein thrombosis of lower limbs, collected from January 2010 to March 2017 in Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital, were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different treatment, these patients were randomly divided into a rivaroxaban group and a control group (traditional warfarin anticoagulation), with 30 patients in each group. The clinical effect and safety were compared between two groups on the 10th day, 20th day and 30th day after treatment. Results Compared with the control group, maximum short axis diameter, ratio of right and left ventricles, systolic pulmonary artery pressure, and main pulmonary artery diameter measured by CTPA and echocardiography in the rivaroxaban group were not significantly different on the 10th day, 20th day and 30th day after treatment. However, the intragroup differences were statistically significant at different timepoint (P<0.05). Levels of N-terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide of two groups after treatment were significantly reduced on the 10th day, 20th day and 30th day after treatment, and the values of PO2 were significantly increased on the 10th day and 20th day after treatment (P<0.05), but no significant differences were found in the values of PO2 on 20th day and 30th day after treatment. D-dimer in the two groups was obviously increased on the 10th day after treatment but significantly declined on the 20th day and 30th day after treatment (all P<0.05). These changes were predominant in the rivaroxaban group. Conclusion Rivaroxaban is effective and safe for acute pulmonary thromboembolism at moderate risk with deep vein thrombosis of lower limbs, and worthy of clinical implementation and application.
ObjectivesTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban for perioperative anticoagulation in the ablation of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. MethodsPubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, WanFang Data, CNKI and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect cohort studies on the efficacy and safety of dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban for perioperative anticoagulation in the ablation of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation from inception to July 1st, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.3 and Stata 12.0 software. ResultsA total of 12 cohort studies involving 4 051 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: there were no differences in the rate of thromboembolic (OR=0.92, 95%CI 0.36 to 2.35, P=0.86), ischemic stroke (OR=1.15, 95%CI 0.22 to 6.07, P=0.87), major bleeding (OR=0.84, 95%CI 0.43 to 1.66, P=0.61), minor bleeding (OR=0.90, 95%CI 0.60 to 1.34, P=0.60) and pericardial tamponade (OR=1.05, 95%CI 0.45 to 2.47, P=0.90) between dabigatran and rivaroxaban groups. ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that the efficacy and safety of dabigatran vs. rivaroxaban for perioperative anticoagulation in the ablation of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation are similar. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo investigate whether treatment of rivaroxaban, an approved oral direct coagulation factor Xa inhibitor, attenuates functional changes in LPS -induced acute lung injury (ALI) mouse.MethodsC57BL/6 mice were randomly divided into PBS group, N-LPS group, L-LPS group, and H-LPS group. In the C57BL/6 mice being fed chow containing 0.2 mg/g or 0.4 mg/g rivaroxaban for 10 days (L-LPS group and H-LPS group), plasma concentration and coagulation indices were measured. Next, the role of rivaroxaban in ALI by using mice fed by rivaroxaban was studied in a murine ALI model induced by direct intratracheal injection lipopolysaccharides (LPS). Lung injury by histopathological scoring, micro computed tomography, pulmonary edema, inflammatory cell recruitment and activity of inflammatory cytokines in lung tissue or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) were assessed. Western blot and immunohistochemistry were performed to examine expression of multiple proteins, including myeloperoxidase, protease-activatedreceptor 2 (PAR-2) and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB).ResultsThe increased plasma concentration of rivaroxaban and the prolonged prothrombin time were displayed in the mice with rivaroxaban treatment. Rivaroxaban treatment groups showed significant reductions in neutrophil sequestration and preservation of the lung tissue architecture compared to the LPS positive control (P<0.05). Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels, in addition to total protein and Evans blue concentration were all significantly reduced in BALF from the mice treated with the chow containing rivaroxaban. Administration of rivaroxaban ameliorated ALI with concomitant reductions in the expression of PAR-2 and proinflammatory cytokines. LPS-induced PAR-2 increase and NF-κB activation were also suppressed by rivaroxaban in lung tissues. Furthermore, rivaroxaban inhibited the phosphorylation levels of P65 in ALI.ConclusionsThe results demonstrate that rivaroxaban effectively attenuates LPS-induced inflammatory responses by noncoagulative pathway in ALI. The beneficial effects are associated with the decreased phosphorylation of NF-κB pathways and the reduced expression of PAR-2.