ObjectiveTo investigate the short-term effects of Da Vinci robot-assisted Nissen fundoplication in the treatment of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (rGERD), and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of its surgical treatment.MethodsA total of 40 patients with rGERD treated by Da Vinci robot-assisted surgery from October 2016 to November 2019 in our hospital were collected. There were 23 males and 17 females at age of 34-76 (61±23) years. The related clinical data were retrospectively analyzed, and the operation skills of Da Vinci robot-assisted Nissen fundoplication with rGERD were summarized.ResultsThere was no perioperative death or serious complication such as esophagogastric fistula. Postoperative reflux symptoms were significantly improved. DeMeester scores after surgery (39.79±35.01 points vs. 2.61±2.40 points, P=0.029), lower esophageal sphincter pressure (8.74±7.21 mm Hg vs. 24.56±8.76 mm Hg, P=0.020), integrated relaxation pressure (7.29±7.21 mm Hg vs. 16.49±9.99 mm Hg, P=0.023), distal contractile integral (600.49 ± 665.30 mm Hg·s·m vs. 510.99 ± 580.60 mm Hg·s·m, P=0.042), GERD-Q scale score (12.98±2.39 points vs. 7.59±1.11 points, P=0.033) were significantly improved compared with those before surgery. Postoperative dysphagia was found in 2 patients. And dysphagia was alleviated after diet adjustment and other treatments.ConclusionDa Vinci robot-assisted Nissen fundoplication is a safe and effective treatment for rGERD.
ObjectiveThrough comparing the therapeutic efficacy of robot-assisted surgery (RS) and conventional surgery (CS) for mitral valve disease by meta-analysis to guide the choice of clinical operation.MethodsDatabases including The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biology Medicine disc (CBMdisc) and Wanfang Database were searched by computer from inception to June 2020. The literature of efficacy comparison between RS and CS was collected. Two reviewers independently screened the literature according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data, and evaluated the quality of the literature. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software.ResultsWe identified 11 studies of RS versus CS with 4 330 patients. Among them, 2 212 patients underwent RS and 2 118 underwent CS. Meta-analysis demonstrated that compared with the CS, RS had longer cross-clamp time (MD=25.00, 95%CI 15.04 to 34.95, P<0.000 01), cardiopulmonary bypass time (MD=44.11, 95%CI 29.26 to 58.96, P<0.000 01) and operation time (MD=46.40, 95%CI 31.55 to 61.26, P<0.000 01). However, ICU stay (MD=–22.13, 95%CI –31.88 to –12.38, P<0.000 01) and hospital stay (MD=–1.81, 95%CI –2.69 to –0.92, P<0.000 01) were significantly shorter in the RS group; and the incidences of blood transfusion (OR=0.38, 95%CI 0.16 to 0.89, P=0.03) and complications (OR=0.73, 95%CI 0.57 to 0.94, P=0.01) were significantly lower in the RS group.ConclusionAlthough RS has a longer operation time than CS, it has less damage, less bleeding, faster recovery and better curative efficacy.
ObjectiveTo introduce the method and preliminary experience of robot-assisted bilateral internal mammary arteries (BIMA) harvesting for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) with 5 grafts via left anterolateral minithoracotomy.MethodsBIMA were harvested using the da Vinci robotic surgical system, and the right internal mammary artery (RIMA) was pulled out of the thoracic cavity through right second intercostal space. Intercepting the distal part of the RIMA for the BIMA composite Lima-Rima Y graft and anastomosing the great saphenous vein with remaining RIMA end to end. The Y graft anastomosed with left anterior descending (LAD) branch and diagonal branches (DIAG), artery-vein graft sequentially anastomosed with blunt round branch, left ventricular posterior branch and posterior descending branch.ResultsThe operation succeeded without hemodynamic instability and intra aortic balloon pump (IABP) implantation or cardiopulmonary bypass. The blood flow of Y graft was 24 mL/min, and the blood flow of artery-vein graft was 30 mL/min. Ventilator assistance time was 35 hours, ICU staying time was 62 hours, and postoperative myocardial enzymes increased temporarily. Postoperative coronary CTA showed that all the grafts were patency, and cardiac ultrasound indicated that the heart function was normal. The patient cured and discharged from hospital 7 days after operation.ConclusionRobot-assisted bilateral internal mammary artery harvesting for OPCAB with 5 grafts via left anterolateral minithoracotomy is feasible, which can achieve complete revascularization.
ObjectiveTo review and evaluate the research progress of the robot-assisted joint arthroplasty.MethodsThe domestic and foreign related research literature on robot-assisted joint arthroplasty was extensively consulted. The advantages, disadvantages, effectiveness, and future prospects were mainly reviewed and summarized.ResultsThe widely recognized advantages of robot-assisted joint arthroplasty are digital and intelligent preoperative planning, accurate intraoperative prosthesis implantation, and quantitative soft tissue balance, as well as good postoperative imaging prosthesis position and alignment. However, the advantages of effectiveness are still controversial. The main disadvantages of robot-assisted joint arthroplasty are the high price of the robot system, the prolonged operation time, and the increased radioactive damage of the imaging-dependent system.ConclusionCompared to traditional arthroplasty, robot-assisted joint arthroplasty can improve the accuracy of the prosthesis position and assist in the quantitative assessment of soft tissue tension, and the repeatability rate is high. In the future, further research is needed to evaluate the clinical function and survival rate of the prosthesis, as well as to optimize the robot system.
Objective To evaluate the methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines and consensuses of robot-assisted surgery. Methods The guidelines and consensuses were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria by searching the domestic and overseas guidelines network and electronic database from 1 January, 2000 to 29 December, 2021. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and EvaluationⅡ (AGREEⅡ) instrument was used independently by two evaluators to evaluate the guidelines and consensuses. The consistency test of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was carried out for two evaluators, and the score of guidelines and consensuses in the six domains of AGREEⅡ were calculated. Results A total of 34 guidelines and consensuses were included, including 10 guidelines and 24 consensuses. The ICC was all greater than 0.75, indicating that the consistency of the two evaluators was high. The average scores of the 34 guidelines and consensuses in the six domains of AGREEⅡ (scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, clarity of presentation, applicability and editorial independence) were 81.0%, 43.5%, 28.2%, 81.5%, 12.7% and 51.7%, respectively. Conclusion These evaluated guidelines and consensuses of robot-assisted surgery still need to be improved in the domains of rigor of development, applicability and editorial independence. With the continuous development of robot-assisted surgery, more guidelines and consensuses based on higher level of evidence will be developed to promote the standardized use of robot-assisted surgery.