west china medical publishers
Author
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Author "SHEN Baiyong" 3 results
  • Selection of Appropriate Graft Directed by Venous Drainage Types of Median Hepatic Lobe in Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation

    Objective To discuss venous drainage types of median hepatic lobe and their guiding significances on the selection of grafts. Methods Between April 2005 and March 2009, 109 potential living donors underwent 3-dimensional reconstruction of computed tomography (CT) and the volume of graft was determined in the center of organ transplantation of Ruijin Hospital. The venous drainage types of median hepatic lobe of each donor were analyzed by the computer-based liver operation-planning system in detail to assign middle hepatic vein (MHV) types according to Marcos classification and venous types of Ⅳb segment according to Nakamura classification. Results The branching pattern of MHV was divided into 3 types: Type Ⅰ and Ⅱwere relatively more accounting for 44.0% (48/109), 37.6% (41/109), and type Ⅲ was fewest 〔18.3% (20/109)〕. There were no significant differences in volume of whole liver, volume of left liver or left liver/total liver volume ratio among various types of MHV of the donor (Pgt;0.05). Ⅳb vein was also divided into 3 types: The most common was type Ⅰ, accounting for 72.4% (79/109); Type Ⅱ 〔12.8% (14/109)〕, type Ⅲ 〔14.7% (16/109)〕 were relatively fewer. At last, 37 donors provided right liver, for Marcos Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ type of donors, donors remained with MHV was 12/17, 8/11, and 5/9; for Nakamura Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ type of donors, those number were 16/26, 4/6, and 5/5. Conclusion In adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation, there may be great significances in accordance with Marcos and Nakamura typing results to harvest right lobe liver graft with or without MHV.

    Release date:2016-09-08 10:54 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Minimally Invasive Liver Resection:from Laparoscopic to Robotic

    Objective?To approach feasibility, safety, and the application range of pure laparoscopic resection (PLR), hand-assisted laparoscopic resection (HALR), and robotic liver resection (RLR) in the minimally invasive liver resection (MILR). Methods?The clinical data of 128 patients underwent MILR in the Surgical Department of the Shanghai Ruijin Hospital from September 2004 to January 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the different methods, the patients were divided into PLR group, HALR group, and RLR group. The intraoperative findings and postoperative recovery of patients in three groups were compared.?Results?There were 82 cases in PLR group, 3 cases of which were transferred to open surgery;the mean operating time was (145.4±54.4) minutes (range:40-290 minutes);the mean blood loss was (249.3±255.7) ml (range:30-1 500 ml);abdominal infection was found in 3 cases and biliary fistula in 5 cases after operation, but all recovered after conservative treatment;the mean length of hospital stay was (7.1±3.8) days (range:2-34 days). There were 35 cases in HALR group, 3 cases of which were transferred to open surgery;the mean operating time was (182.7±59.2) minutes (range:60-300 minutes);the mean blood loss was (754.3±785.2) ml (range:50-3 000 ml);abdominal infection was found in 1 case, biliary fistula in 2 cases, and operative incision infection in 2 cases after operation, but all recovered after conservative treatment;the mean length of hospital stay was (15.4±3.7) days (range:12-30 days). There were 11 cases in RLR group, 2 cases of which were transferred to open surgery; the mean operating time was (129.5±33.5) minutes (range:120-200 minutes); the mean blood loss was (424.5±657.5) ml (range:50-5 000 ml); abdominal infection was found in 1 case and biliary fistula in 1 case after operation, but all recovered after conservative treatment; the mean length of hospital stay was (6.4±1.6) days (range:5-9 days). The operating time (P=0.001) and length of hospital stay (P=0.000) of the RLR group were shortest and the blood loss (P=0.000) of the PLR group was least among three groups. Conclusions?Minimally invasive resection is a safe and feasible. Different surgical procedures should be chosen according to different cases. The robotic liver resection provides new development for treatment of liver tumor.

    Release date:2016-09-08 10:38 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Preoperative and Intraoperative Evaluation and Operative Methods of Pancreaticoduodenectomy Combined with Vascular Resection

    【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the preoperative and intraoperative evaluation and the operative methods of pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with resection of involved blood vessel. Methods The materials of 226 cases of carcinoma of head of pancreas, which were collected from January 2002 to June 2005, were assessed according to the T-grade evaluative method and were summarized into a more accurate method of preoperative and intraoperative evaluation and an operative method of the pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with vascular resection. The statistical analyses were performed by SAS 6.12 Stat software package with χ2 test for categorical data. Results The coincidence of every preoperative evaluations on pancreaticoduodenectomy with T-grade method were more than 85.00% and the accurate rate of evaluation on relationship between tumor and blood vessel was 80.97%. As the degree of T-grade increased, the proportion of requiring pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with vascular resection increased significantly as well (P<0.001). All operations were smoothly done and the reconstruction of removed vascular took 12 to 46 minutes. The complication rate and the mortality rate of perioperative period were 19.61% and 1.96%, respectively. Conclusion  With more practice, experience and the advanced imaging technology, it is possible for professional surgeon to evaluate more accurately on the pancreaticoduodenectomy combined with vascular resection by using the preoperative T-grade method. T-grade evaluative method is useful for operator to assess the indication accurately and to design the operative schedule reasonably. Accurate operational evaluation and careful operation are also important for pancreatoduodenectomy combined vascular resection.

    Release date:2016-09-08 11:53 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content