Objective To explore the differences of three-dimensional porous blended silk scaffolds with different sericin ratios in terms of molecular structure, mechanical properties, and biological characteristics. Methods Fibroin/sericin blended aqueous solution [concentration 8% (W/V)] with various sericin ratios 0%, 2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, 10%, 12% and NaCl asa porogen with different particle sizes (125-200, 200-300, 300-450, 450-600, 600-900, 900-1 100 μm) were used to fabricate the three-dimensional porous blended silk scaffolds. Gross observation of the formation of three-dimensional porous blended silk scaffolds of different sericin ratios and pore sizes was performed. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to detect the distribution and diameter of the pore sizes. Its porosity was calculated by l iquids replacement method. X-ray diffractometer (XRD) and fourier transform infrared (FTIR) were used to detect its internal molecular structure. Its mechanical properties, enzyme degration rate in vitro and experiment on SD rats in vivo, and histolgy observation after coculturing homogeneous scaffold (sericin ratio 0-12%, NaCl particle size 600-900 μm) with adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) were detected. Results Gross observation showed that the higher of the ratio of sericin protein, the greater of the porogen sizes scope which used to form homogeneous silk scaffolds. The result of SEM showed that the pores of the three-dimensional porous blended silk scaffolds had uniform distribution and was connected with each other. Its pore sizes was in the scope of the porogen sizes, and its porosity all above 90%. The angel corresponding to the characteristic peak of the sericin/fibroin blended scaffolds were 20.6° and 24.6° (XRD), and the wavelength corresponding to the characteristic peak of the sericin/fibroin blended scaffoldswere 3 296, 2 933 and 1 629 cm-1 (FTIR) which was the same as the angel and wavelength corresponding to the characteristic peak of the natural silk. The mechanical properties of the sericin/fibroin blended scaffolds was improved with the increase of sericin ratios, and the compressional resil ience reached 100% when the ratio ≥ 6%. The different ratios of sericin and the different particle size of porogen had no significant effect on the enzyme degradation rate in vitro. The histological observation 14 days after ADSCs-scaffold co-culture indicated that the scaffolds had slow degradation rate, and sl ight inflammatory response in vivo. ADSCs were well attached to the sericin/fibroin blended scaffolds of different sericin ratios, with varied morphology, rich cytoplasm, and nuclear enrichment, the l ight staining ECM was observed surrounding the cells. Conclusion The mechanical property of the three-dimensional porous blended silk scaffolds is improved by silk sericins with ratio ≥ 6% obviously, which will lay the groudwork for further research and making of strengthen silk scaffolds.
ObjectiveTo clarify the effectiveness of preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation (PPR) and provide evidence for the application of PPR on lung cancer patients by meta-analysis.MethodsAccording to inclusion and exclusion criteria, literatures related to PPR on lung cancer patients were retrieved from major databases between the date of establishment of each database and January 2019, and then data required were extracted from the selected literatures. Meta-analysis was conducted by RevMan 5.0.ResultsTwelve randomized controlled trials were involved in meta-analysis, including 658 patients who were well-diagnosed and prepared for surgery, with 307 patients in the PPR group and 351 patients in the control group. The results of the meta-analysis showed that in the PPR group, the pulmonary function including forced vital capacity [MD=0.31, 95%CI (0.21, 0.42), P<0.01], forced expiratory volume in one second [MD=0.27, 95%CI (0.20, 0.34), P<0.01] and activity tolerance including 6-minute walk distance [MD=50.55, 95%CI (35.98, 65.13), P<0.01] were significantly better than the control group, and the postoperative complication rate was lower ［MD=0.28, 95%CI (0.18, 0.43), P<0.01］, postoperative hospital stay was shorter [MD=–2.09, 95%CI (–2.41, –1.77), P<0.01].ConclusionsA period of PPR on lung cancer patients can improve postoperative pulmonary function and activity tolerance, and reduce postoperative complications and hospital stay, which is beneficial to postoperative recovery.