Objective To observe the changes of autoflurorescence (AF) in periphery retina after scleral buckling. Methods The examination of peripheral fundus autoflurorescence with Optos 200Tx was performed in 46 patients (46 eyes) who underwent successful scleral buckling. The correlation between changes of AF in surgical area and visual function were analyzed by multiple linear stepwise regression analysis.Results One week after surgery, completely atrophy of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) with disappeared AF was found in the cryotherapy area of 15 eyes (32.6%), uneven area with enhanced AF and scattered weak AF spots was found in 31 eyes (67.4%). The area of RPE atrophy caused by cryocoagulation was 4 times larger than that of the primary retinal tear or holes in 9 eyes (19.6%), and was 2 to 4 times larger in 11 eyes (23.9%), and was 2 times less in the rest of 26 eyes (56.5%). A few granular hyper-AF was observed at the compressed retinal area in 11 eyes (23.9%), normal AF was observed at the compressed retinal area in 35 eyes (76.9%). When alpha;=0.05, the area with AF changes was significantly correlated with both vertical and horizontal diameter of peripheral visual filed (beta;=-0.024, -0.019; P＜0.001), but was not correlated with the best corrected visual acuity (F=0.51.22,P=0.312) by multiple linear stepwise regression analysis. Conclusions SBS can cause peripherial AF changes. Peripheral AF examination is helpful to evaluate the surgical retinal damage of scleral buckling.
Myopic foveoschisis (MF) has mild early symptoms, however, its course is progressive. When the secondary macular detachment or macular hole occurs, it can cause severe vision loss. Therefore, it is generally believed that MF patients should undergo surgical intervention early after the onset of symptoms to prevent them from further developing into a macular hole or macular hole retinal detachment.It is generally believed that the traction of the vitreous cortex and posterior scleral staphyloma to the retina plays an important role in the occurrence and development of MF. The operation mode is divided into vitreoretinal surgery and macular buckling, the former release the retinal traction via the vitreous body and the latter reattaches the retina via the extrascleral approach. There is no consensus on whether to perform internal limiting membrane peeling and gas tamponade in vitreoretinal surgery and the fovea-sparing internal limiting membrane peeling has become a hot topic in recent years. Compared with vitreoretinal surgery, macular buckling can release the traction of the retina caused by posterior scleral staphyloma, but it cannot relieve the traction in the tangential direction of the retina. Vitreoretinal surgery and extrascleral surgery seems to make up the shortcomings of both, however, the effect of treatment on patients still needs further verification. In clinical work, it is necessary to conduct individualized analysis of MF patients, weigh the advantages and disadvantages of each operation, and choose the most suitable operation mode for patients with different conditions. In the future, the emphasis of our work is to develop operation mode with great curative effect and less complications.