Based on review and practice of literature search of clinical economic evaluation, We have discussed the source and search strategy of literatures of clinical economic evaluation. A sample on antibiotics in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia was shown concurrently.
In this paper, we introduce search strategies and methods of contraceptive evidence through two aspects of evidence-based medicine, namely, the application of evidence and the creation of evidence. We should make choices according to our objectives when we search clinical evidence. If we aim to apply evidence, we should sequentially choose different databases according to the quality of evidence and use accurate search terms to search relevant papers quickly; if we aim to create evidence, we should choose multiple related databases and use different search terms to retrieve relevant studies comprehensively. The sensitivity and specificity of the selected search terms can be identified according to our purposes and the number of the retrieved papers.
Objective To search through the Cochrane database of systematic reviews using the flag new search option to find out whether this strategy helps update revivews. Methods We chose the New search option in the advanced search in The Cochrane Library on Wiley InterScience (Issue 1, 2009), and input all hit citations to the ProCite software. We then looked through the `What’s new`,`History`, as well as `Appendices` on hit reviews in the Cochrane library one by one, and then added these related contents to thef ield of the ProCite in order to analyze the results. Results A total of 140 systematic reviews had the flag new search. Among them, the total new search frequency were 274, meaning frequency was 1.96/1; updated within two years were 58 (41.43); there were 61 reviews with `Appendices` (43.57%). The status of the chosen database among the 61 reviews with `Appendices` was as follows: most were from MEDLINE (56 reviews, 91.80%), next EMBASE (47 reviews, 77.05 %), and finally CENTRAL (45 reviews, 73.7%). Among the reviews with `Appendices`, most of them were not correctly labeled. Conclusion Although some Cochrane systematic reviews are updated in a timely fashion, there is some incomplete information, although it may be still helpful for researchers to look for new studies.
ObjectiveTo investigate the reporting of search strategies of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in China. MethodsWe electronically searched WanFang Data, VIP, CNKI and CBM for clinical practice guidelines developed in China from inception to December 2012. Two reviewers independently screened guidelines, extracted data, and analyzed search strategies in these guidelines. ResultsA total of 380 Chinese CPGs were included, of which, only 13 reported search strategies of evidence, 9 in China reported search terms, 5 reported retrieval time of Chinese CPGs, and only 3 completely reported search terms, retrieval time and search databases. ConclusionThe reporting rate of search strategies of evidence in Chinese CPGs is fairly low and Chinese CPGs lack unified reporting criteria. We suggest that the developers of Chinese guideline should apply the reporting items of AGREE Ⅱ and the criteria of Conference on Guideline Standardization (COGS) to report CPGs.
ObjectiveTo provide a reference for developing search strategy of systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) of animal researches (ARs) in future, we investigated and analyzed the search strategy of SRs/MAs of ARs at home and abroad. MethodsOvid-MEDLINE, Ovid-EMbase, Ovid-BIOSIS previews, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data were searched from inception to January 2015, to collect SRs/MAs of ARs that related to medicine. No limitation in species. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted basic characteristics, databases and other sources searched, characteristics of reported search strategy of included studies. ResultA total of 181 SRs/MAs of ARs were finally included. Less than 30% SRs/MAs searched more than three databases, 65.7% reported supplementary retrieval. 86.2% (156/181) SRs/MAs reported search terms, but only 12 reported search strategy; the search terms of 33 studies included specific name of animal, 27 studies used "animal/experimental model/", 20 studies used "limit to animal". 71.3% SRs/MAs reported specific time limitation of searching, 44.2% reported whether limited language, 23.8% of them limited language, and more of these limited to English. ConclusionAt present, there are still some problems in SRs/MAs of ARs at home and abroad when choice database, search terms and search strategy, so we advise that:1) It's necessary to choice typical databases as many as possible according to search field; 2) Using specific animal's name and (or) "animal" as one of search terms, and using "limit to animal" according to characteristic of different databases; 3) The reporting of search strategy of SRs/MAs of ARs should include search sources, time limitation, language limitation, limitation of inclusion type, search terms and complete search strategy, besides, reporting knowledge of reviewers is also necessary; 4) To improve transparency and clarity of SRs/MAs of ARs, some related journals should introduce "reporting complete search strategy" in their instruction for authors.
Objective To retrospectively analyze the search strategy of systematic reviews/meta-analyses(SRs/MAs) of nursing researches, and to provide the references for developing search strategy of SRs/MAs of nurse researchers in future. Methods The SRs/MAs in nursing journals from CSCD and Web of Science were searched from inception to October 2015. Four reviewers independently screened literatures and extracted data. Then data analysis was conducted by using Excel 2007 software. Results A total of 112 nursing SRs/MAs were finally included, 44 were published in English and 68 were published in Chinese. 37.5% (42/112) SRs/MAs reported the flow charts, 13.39% (15/112) reported the knowledge of reviewers, and 8.04% (9/112) reported the comprehensive search strategies. 48.21% SRs/MAs searched less than five databases, 15% SRs/MAs searched more than ten databases. 45.54% SRs/MAs reported supplementary retrieval, 8.93% searched the gray literatures. Patients combined with intervention was the most way in searching. Conclusion There are still some limitations in search strategy of SRs/MAs for nursing studies. We advise that: (1) it’s necessary to choice typical databases as many as possible according to search field; (2) the reporting of search strategy of nursing SRs/MAs should reporte knowledge of reviewers; (3) to improve transparency and quality of SRs/MAs in nursing researches, journals should introduce reporting complete search strategy in their instruction for authors.
ObjectivesTo introduce the formulating methods and implementing steps of search strategy of systematic reviews (SRs)/meta-analysis (MAs) of animal experiments, so as to provide a reference for domestic related researchers, and promote the development and implementation of high quality SRs/MAs of animal experiments in China. MethodsPubMed, EMbase and CNKI databases were searched online to retrieve studies on the search strategy of SRs/ MAs of animal experiments from inception to October 2017. A descriptive analysis was then conducted using the evidence-based medicine theory and method.ResultsA total of 5 studies were included. The 5 basic steps on how to design and carry out comprehensive search strategies to identify potentially relevant animal experiments on a specific research question were as follow: 1) Formulate research question; 2) Identify appropriate databases and sources of studies; 3) Transform research question into search strategy; 4) Collect search results and remove duplicates; 5) Identify potentially relevant papers. The report of search strategy needs to state its search method and search results clearly.ConclusionThese 5 steps can provide an effective method, which will assist researchers in performing a comprehensive literature search.
Using the method of sample analysis, this paper showed the method of PubMed’s animal experiments retrieval strategy in system evaluations. It analyzed the literature retrieval strategy and practice of systematic evaluations of animal medicine in evidence-based medicine so as to provide reference for improving the capability of health workers, and researchers to search and construct retrieval strategies.