Objective To assess the influence of dexmedetomidine on the recovery of pediatric patients after sevoflurane anesthesia. Methods Such databases as PubMed (1966 to March 2012), The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2012), EBSCO (ASP) (1984 to March 2012), Journals@Ovid Full Text (1993 to March 2012), CBM (1978 to March 2012), CNKI (1979 to March 2012), VIP (1989 to March 2012), and WanFang Data (1998 to March 2012) were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the influence of dexmedetomidine on the recovery of pediatric patients after sevoflurane anesthesia, and the references of the included studies were also retrieved. Two researchers extracted the data and evaluated the methodological quality of the included studies independently. Then the RevMan 5.2 software was used for meta-analysis. Results A total of 16 RCTs involving 1 217 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the placebo, dexmedetomidine could reduce the occurrence of emergence agitation (OR=0.18, 95%CI 0.13 to 0.25, Plt;0.000 01) and increase the occurrence of postoperative lethargy (OR=0.14, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.68, P=0.01), but there were no differences in the occurrence of side effects including bronchospasm, bucking, breathholding, and oxygen desaturation. Dexmedetomidine could also reduce mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) of pediatric patients during the recovery period after sevoflurane anesthesia, but it increased emergence time (MD=2.14, 95%CI 0.95 to 3.33, P=0.000 4), extubation time (MD=1.26, 95%CI 0.51 to 2.00, P=0.000 9) and the time of staying in PACU (MD=4.72, 95%CI 2.07 to 7.38, P=0.000 5). Conclusions For pediatric patients recovering from sevoflurane-based general anesthesia, dexmedetomidine can reduce the occurrence of emergence agitation, and is helpful to maintain the hemodynamic balance. But it prolongs emergence time, extubation time (or the time of using the laryngeal mask) and the time of staying in PACU, and increases the occurrence of postoperative lethargy.
Objective To systematically review the impacts of general anesthesia using sevoflurane versus propofol on the incidence of emergence agitation in pediatric patients. Methods Such databases as PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2012), CNKI, CBM, WanFang Data and VIP were electronically searched from inception to December 2012, for comprehensively collecting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the impacts of general anesthesia using sevoflurane versus propofol on the incidence of emergence agitation in pediatric patients. References of included studies were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. Results A total of 9 RCTs involving 692 children were included, of which, six were pooled in the meta-analysis. The results of meta-analysis showed that: a) after anesthesia induction using sevoflurane, intravenous propofol maintenance was associated with a lower incidence of emergence agitation compared with sevoflurane maintenance (RR=0.57, 95%CI 0.39 to 0.84, P=0.004); and b) patients anesthetized with total intravenous propofol had a lower incidence of emergence agitation compared with total inhalation of sevoflurane (RR=0.16, 95%CI 0.06 to 0.39, Plt;0.000 1). Conclusion The incidence of emergence agitation after general anesthesia using sevoflurane is higher than that using propofol. Due to the limited quantity and quality, the application of sevoflurane should be chosen based on full consideration into patients’ conditions in clinic.
Objective To investigate change of bispectral index(BIS) and hemodynamic index during induction and orotracheal intubation of sevoflurane anesthesia. Methods This study was a prospective before-after study in the same patients. A total of 30 ASA physical status I and II adult patients without airway abnormalities were enrolled to receive inhalation induction of anesthesia with 8% sevoflurane. Mean arterial pressure(MAP),heart rate(HR) and BIS were recorded before anesthesia(T1),when patients loss of consciousness(T2), before intubation (T3),at 1 min(T4) and 3 min(T5) after intubation. Results BIS at T1-T5 were 96.8±1.7,70.4±8.8,39.2±8.4,43.6±12.9 and 41.6±9.3 respectively, the measurements at T2-T5 were all markedly lower than at T1(Plt;0.05). HR at T3-T5 were all markedly higher than at T1(Plt;0.05). MAP at T2 and T3 were markedly lower than at T1, but at T4 was higher than at T1(Plt;0.05), and recovered to the level at T1 at T5(Pgt;0.05).BIS,HR and MAP at T4 were all significantly higher than T3(Plt;0.05). Conclusion Anesthesia induction with sevoflurane and small dose of succinylchoiline we used can provide adequate depth of general anesthesia,but can not prevent cardiovascular adverse reactions to intubation.
Abstract： Objective To observe myocardial protective effect of sevoflurane used in the whole process of cardiopulmonary bypass（CPB）. Methods A total of 150 patients older than 18 years who underwent cardiac surgery under CPB in Fu wai Hospital from January 2010 to November 2011 were enrolled in this double-blind and randomized controlled study. All the patients were randomly divided into three groups：Sevoflurane pretreatment group （Group A，n=50），whole-process Sevoflurane group （Group B，n=50），and whole-process intravenous anesthesia group （Group C，n=50）. Radial artery pressure and other hemodynamic parameters were continuously measured for all the patients. At following time points: CPB beginning （T1），aortic declamping （T2），3 hours after aortic declamping （T3），and 24 hours after aortic declamping （T4），serum concentrations of cardiac troponin I （cTnI） and other parameters were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay （ELISA）. Results There were 31 males and 19 females at age of 60.43±3.24 years in group A，28 males and 22 females at age of 59.88±4.12 years in group B，31 males and 19 females at age of 58.76±3.87 years. There was no statistical difference in mean arterial pressure （MAP），central venous pressure （CVP），pulmonary artery wedge pressure （PAWP） and heart rate （HR） at respective time points among the 3 groups （P＞0.05）. At T1 and T2，there was no statistical difference in cardiac index （CI） among the 3 groups （P＞0.05）. At T3，there was no statistical difference in CI between Group A and Group C（F=3.382，P=0.845），but CI of Group B was significantly higher than that of Group A and C（F=3.382，3.382； P=0.033，0.020）. At T4，CI of Group B was significantly higher than that of Group A and C （F=13.324，13.324； P=0.005，P=0.000），and CI of Group A was significantly higher than that of Group C （F=13.324，P=0.024）. At T1 and T2，there was no statistical difference in serum concentrations of creatinine kinase MB （CK-MB），cTnI，interleukin-6 （IL-6） and tumor necrosis factor alpha （TNF-α） among the 3 groups （P＞0.05）. At T3 and T4，serum concentrations of CK-MB，TNF-α，IL-6 and cTnI of Group C were significantly higher than those of Group A，and serum concentrations of CK-MB，TNF-α，IL-6 and cTnI of Group A were significantly higher than those of Group B （F=531.616，5.410，3.5813，3.160，1.126，4.702，7.819，5.424，all P=0.000）. Conclusion Sevoflurane used in the whole process of CPB has definite myocardial protective effect which is ber than that of Sevoflurane pretreatment.
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of sevoflurane versus ketamine in the anesthesia of child short period surgery. Methods Such databases as EMbase, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, CBMdisc, Ongoing Controlled Trial and Conference Articles were searched from their establishment to April 2011 to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the quasi-RCTs. The quality of those studies meeting the inclusive criteria was assessed, the data were extracted and the meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.1.1 software. Results Ten studies involving 600 participants were included. Seven studies showed that the intraoperative heart rate of the sevoflurane group was lower than that of the ketamine group (MD= –11.85, 95%CI –16.47 to –7.23, Plt;0.000 01). Nine studies showed that the revival time of the sevoflurane group was shorter than that of the ketamine group (MD= –29.05, 95%CI –37.98 to –20.12, Plt;0.000 01). Three studies showed that the anesthesia induction time of the sevoflurane group was shorter than that of the ketamine group (MD= –208.45, 95%CI –359.22 to –57.68, P=0.007). Six studies showed that the influence on mean arterial pressure (MAP) had no significante difference (MD= –4.86, 95%CI –10.02 to 0.29, P=0.06). Meanwhile, seven studies showed that the adverse events of the sevoflurane group were fewer than those of the ketamine group (Peto OR=0.29, 95%CI 0.20 to 0.40, Plt;0.000 01). Conclusion The results of this system review show that sevoflurane is more effective than ketamine with fewer adverse reactions, and it provides a new choice for clinical anesthesia for child short period surgery. However, ketamine is still the main drug in clinical anesthesia for the child short period surgery at present, so high quality studies are needed for further clinical researches.
Objective We aimed to determine the efficacy and complication of sevoflurane maintenance in children. Methods Trials were collected through electronic searches of MEDLINE, EBSCO, OVID, Springer, Foreign Journals Integration System, CNKI, and CMBdisk (from the date of building the database to April 2008). We also checked the bibliographies of retrieved articles. Results A total of 20 trials involving 1 592 patients were included. The Metaanalysis showed: ① Recovery time: sevoflurane was similar with propofol [WMD=0.22, 95%CI (–2.86, 3.30)], but slower than desflurane [WMD=5.01, 95%CI (2.87, 7.16)], and faster than isoflurane [WMD= –0.55, 95%CI (– 0.74, –0.37)]; ② Discharge time: sevoflurane was similar with propofol [WMD= –4.39, 95%CI (–10.02, 1.25)], desflurane[WMD=1.13, 95%CI (–3.25, 5.51)], and isoflurane [WMD= –8.17, 95%CI (–17.94, 1.60)]; ③ Postoperative agitation: sevoflurane was much more obvious than propofol [RR=5.53, 95%CI (2.99, 10.21)], but superior than desflurane [RR=0.55, 95%CI (0.35, 0.88)], and similar with isoflurane [RR=1.24, 95%CI (0.85, 1.800]; ④ Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV): sevoflurane was much more severe than propofol [RR=2.17, 95%CI (1.21, 3.90)], and no difference with desflurane [RR=0.88, 95%CI (0.61, 1.25)]; ⑤ Oculocardiac reflex: sevoflurane was less than propofol [RD= – 0.42, 95%CI (–0.56, –0.27)], and no difference with desflurane [RR=0.93, 95%CI (0.61, 1.41)]. Conclusion The limited current evidence shows no difference between sevoflurane and propofol in recovery time, while the effect of sevoflurane is faster than isoflurane and slower than desflurane. There are no differences among sevoflurane, desflurane, isoflurane, and propofol in discharge time. The incidence of postoperative agitation of sevoflurane is higher than that of propofol, but lower than that of other inhaled anesthetics. The incidence of PONV of sevoflurane is higher than that of propofol. The incidence of oculocardiac reflex of sevoflurane is lower than that of propofol and similar with that of desflurane.
ObjectiveTo explore the influence of propofol as well as sevoflurane on the histamine release induced by mivacurium chloride. MethodsForty patients with American Sociaty of Anesthesiologists stage Ⅰ-Ⅱ scheduled to receive ear-nose-throat surgery between March and October 2012 were recruited and were randomly assigned into two groups:propofol group and sevoflurane group. Patients in the propofol group were induced with targeted intravenous infusion with propofol. Patients in the sevoflurane group was induced with sevoflurane. The blood specimen was prepared before mivacurium chloride (0.16 mg/kg) infusion (T0), 1 minute (T1), 3 minutes (T2), and 5 minutes (T3) after the infusion. Mean blood pressure (MBP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded at corresponding time points. In addition, we recorded the symptoms of anaphylactic reaction such as skin erythema or bronchospasm. ResultsBoth MBP and HR decreased after anesthesia induction. However, there was no significant difference from that before the induction in both groups, and no difference was found between the two groups (P>0.05). The concentration of histamine in both groups at T1 and T2 was significantly higher than that at T0 (P<0.05). The concentration of histamine in both groups at T4 was significantly higher than that at T0 (P<0.05). The concentration of histamine in the propofol group was higher than that in the sevoflurane group. No skin erythema or bronchospasm was found in any of the two groups. ConclusionMivacurium chloride at a dose of 0.16 mg/kg can be safely used in propofol anesthesia, as well as sevofluane anesthesia, with no clinically significant histamine release or adverse hemodynamic fluctuation.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of sevoflurane and propofol on preoperative implicit and explicit memories in general anaesthesia patients of elective surgery. MethodsThe surgical inpatients in Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital were enrolled from December 2013 to May 2014, and were randomly divided into three groups (S, P, M). In Group S, anesthesia was induced and maintained with sevoflurane. In Group P, anesthesia was induced and maintained with propofol. Midazolam was not utilized throughout the whole anaesthesia for the above groups. Patients in Group S and Group P were given a list of test materials to remember and listen before the anesthesia. Within 12 to 36 hours after operation, memory was assessed, based on the Buchner's model applied on the process dissociation procedure (PDP) using a phrases task. The Group M was given the same test materials, and received test with the PDP in 12 to 36 hours before surgery. Value A and value R were used to represent the implicit memory score and the explicit memory score, respectively. ResultsA total of 150 patients were included, and 50 cases were included in each group. During testing, 2 cases were excluded, 3 cases were loss to follow-up, so finally 49 cases were included in the Group S, 47 cases in the Group P and 49 cases in the Group M. The results showed that there were significant differences in the implicit memory score (A) and the explicit memory score (R) among the three groups (all P values <0.05). The explicit memory score (R) of the Group M was higher than those of the Group P and Group S (all P values <0.05), the implicit memory score (A) in the Group M was higher than those of the Group S and Group P (all P values <0.05), and the implicit memory score (A) in the Group S was higher than that of the Group P (P<0.05). ConclusionPropofol and sevoflurane can decrease the score of explicit memory after anesthesia within 12 to 36 hours, and there are no significant differences in explicit memory between the two drugs. Both propofol and sevoflurane can decrease the score of implicit memory, but the influence of sevoflurane on the implicit memory is less than propofol within 12 to 36 hours.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the safety of propofol versus sevoflurane for pediatric surgery. MethodsEMbase, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, CSCD, CNKI, WanFang Data were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about propofol versus sevoflurane for pediatric surgery from inception to January 2015. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then metaanalysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsFifteen RCTs involving 1 065 children were included finally. Meta-analysis results showed that, compared with the sevoflurane group, the propofol group could reduce the incidence of emergence agitation (OR=0.23, 95%CI 0.16 to 0.34, P<0.000 01) and the incidence of postoperative vomiting (OR=0.32, 95%CI 0.20 to 0.51, P<0.000 01). There were no significant differences between the two groups in extubation time (MD=0.98, 95%CI -0.26 to 2.21, P=0.12), eye-opening time (MD=3.32, 95%CI -2.65 to 9.29, P=0.28) and postoperative analgesic requirements (OR=0.60, 95%CI 0.30 to 1.23, P=0.16). ConclusionIn reducing the incidence of emergence agitation and postoperative vomiting, propofol is superior to sevoflurane, so propofol is safer than sevoflurane for children's surgery.
ObjectiveTo explore the effects of different concentrations of sevoflurane on hyperoxia-induced lung injury in rat.MethodsThe 72 SD rats were randomly divided into control group C (n=12); sevoflurane inhalation group S, group S contains 5 subgroups (n=12) S0, S1.0, S1.5, S2.0, S2.5. Group C wasn’t given any treatment, rats in group S were inhaled 95% oxygen for 48 hours to establish a hyperoxia-induced lung injury model. then rats in each subgroup inhaled sevoflurane at different concentrations of 0%, 1.0%, 1.5%, 2.0% and 2.5% for 1 h respectively, rats in group C were breathe air freely. At the two time points which include inhaled 95% oxygen for 48 hours, and sevoflurane was inhaled for 1 h, blood was collected by the abdominal aorta, then arterial blood was used for blood gas analysis; using enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of serum tumor necrosis factor (TNF) -α and interleukin (IL) -8 and IL-6 concentration; HE staining was carried out in the right lung, and the pathological changes of lung tissue were observed under light microscope; Wet to dry ratio (W/D) of the left lung was taken.ResultsAfter inhalation of 95% oxygen for 48 hours (T1): compared with the group C, group S of arterial blood gas results suggested that the PaO2 value decreased, PaCO2 value increased. The degree of lung tissue injury and the pathological score, TNF-α, IL-8 and IL-6, W/D content increased significantly (P < 0.05), there was no significant difference between the S0 to S2.5 groups; After treatment with sevoflurane for 1 h (T2): compared with the group C, group S of arterial blood gas results suggested that the PaO2 value decreased, PaCO2 value increased. the degree of lung tissue injury and the pathological score, TNF-α, IL-8 and IL-6, W/D content increased significantly (P < 0.05); Compared with before sevoflurane treatment, the PaO2 value increased, PaCO2 value decreased, TNF-α, IL-8 and IL-6, W/D content decreased, pathological score decreased in group S1.0 to S2.5 (P <0.05), but there was no significant difference in group S0; After treatment with sevoflurane, compared with S2.0 group, the PaO2 value decreased, PaCO2 value increased, TNF-, IL-8 and IL-6, W/D content increased, pathological score increased in the group S1.0 and S1.5 (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in group S2.5.ConclusionSevoflurane can effectively reduce the degree of lung injury caused by hyperoxia in rats especially when the concentration is 2%.