Objective To investigate the effectiveness of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction with remnant preservation and autogenous quadrupled hamstring tendons under arthroscopy. Methods Between October 2007 and August 2012, 32 patients with PCL rupture were treated and followed up for more than 1 year. There were 24 males and 8 females, aged 20-53 years (mean, 35.6 years). The causes of injury included traffic accident injury in 21 cases, sports injury in 8 cases, and falling injury from height in 3 cases. The disease duration ranged 1 week to 2 years (median, 6.3 weeks). Nine patients had simple PCL rupture, 23 patients complicated by ligament injury, including 10 cases of anterior cruciate ligament rupture, 11 cases of posterolateral corner injury, and 2 cases of posteromedial corner injury. Preoperative Lysholm score was 53.8 ± 7.1. According to the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) rating criteria, 10 cases were classified as grade C and 22 cases as grade D. PCL was reconstructed with autogenous quadrupled hamstring tendons, the tendons were fixed with EndoButton at the femoral side and with interference screw at the tibial side; floats of stump were cleaned up, and the structural stability and continuity ligament remnants were preserved. Results Primary healing was obtained in all incisions; no early complication occurred after operation. Thirty-two patients were followed up 23.4 months on average (range, 12-36 months). All patients had no symptom of knee instability; the results of tibia sags sign, posterior drawer test, and Lachman test were negative. At last follow-up, the knee range of motion (ROM) returned to normal in all cases. The Lysholm score was 92.3 ± 2.0, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative score (t= — 34.32, P=0.00). According to the IKDC rating criteria, 26 cases were classified as grade A and 6 cases as grade B at last follow-up, showing significant difference when compared with preoperative grade (Z= — 5.57, P=0.00). Conclusion Arthroscopic single-bundle reconstruction of PCL with remnant preservation and quadrupled hamstring tendons has advantages of minimal trauma, simple operation, and good knee function recovery.
Objective To compare the effectiveness between arthroscopic double-bundle and single-bundle anterior cruciate l igament (ACL) reconstruction with deep-frozen allografts. Methods Between January 2008 and January 2009, 105 patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with deep-frozen allografts were selected and randomly divided intosingle-bundle (n=59) or double-bundle (n=46) groups. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively 6, 12, and 24 months. Of the patients, 93 (51 in the single-bundle group and 42 in the double-bundle group) were available for full evaluation. There was no significant difference in gender, age, height, weight, disease duration, compl ication, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and Lysholm score between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The anterior drawer test and the Lachman test for all were rated as + in 2 groups, and the pivot shift test were rated as ++ before operation. Results All wounds healed by first intention, and no related compl ication such as fracture, infection, or deep venous thrombosis was observed. There was no significant difference in the IKDC score, Lysholm score, anterior drawer test, pivot shift test, and Lachman test between 2 groups at 6-month and 12-month follow-up (P gt; 0.05). The IKDC score, Lysholm score, pivot shift test, Lachman test, and the side-to-side difference measured by KT-1000 arthrometer in the double-bundle group were significantly better than those in single-bundle group at 24-month follow-up (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The double-bundle ACL reconstruction with deep-frozen allografts has better effectiveness than the single-bundle ACL reconstruction.
Objective To evaluate knee stability after double-bundle and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized controlled trials (quasi-RCTs) were collected from MEDLINE (1966 to October 2007), OVID (1950 to October 2007), The Cochrane Library (issue 4, 2007) and China Academic Journals Full-text Database (1979 to October 2007). The quality of included trials was assessed. Data analyses were performed with The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.10 software. Results One RCT (quality B) and 5 quasi-RCTs (quality C) involving 426 patients met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses showed significant differences between the two operative procedures in terms of anterior stability (WMD –0.75, 95%CI –1.14 to –0.37, P=0.000 1) and rotational stability [RR 1.38, 95%CI 1.17 to 1.61, Plt;0.000 1]. Conclusion The double-bundle anterior cruciate liagament is superior to single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament in terms of anterior stability and rotational stability. Since the included trials were small and of poor quality, more high-quality, large-scale randomized controlled trials are required.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effectiveness of double-bundle versus single-bundle for arthroscopic transtibial reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). MethodsWe searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, VIP and WanFang Data to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of PCL reconstruction treated with double-bundle versus single-bundle arthroscopic transtibial technique. Two reviewers screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of included studies, and then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 4 RCTs involving 186 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that double-bundle was superior to single-bundle in Lysholm score (MD=2.17, 95%CI 0.29 to 4.05, P=0.02), Tegner score (MD=0.62, 95%CI 0.09 to 1.16, P=0.02), IKDC objective score (A:RR=1.57, 95%CI 1.09 to 2.26, P=0.02; A+B:RR=1.15, 95%CI 1.01 to 1.32, P=0.04). However, there was no significant difference in the KT-1000 posterior between both groups (MD=-0.65, 95%CI -3.29 to 1.99, P=0.63). ConclusionThe current evidence shows that the double bundle arthroscopic transtibial is superior to the single bundle PCL reconstruction. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies with large sample-size are needed to validate the conclusion.