ObjectiveTo compare the curative effect of levetiracetam combined with lamotrigine and sodium valproate on postoperative patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. MethodsA total of 186 postoperative patients with temporal lobe epilepsy during August 2012 to August 2014 in our hospital were divided into levetiracetam combined with lamotrigine group (n=98), and sodium valproate group (n=88) based on postoperative different antiepileptic drugs treatment. Antiepileptic treatment were followed up for 12~48 months.Curative effect and adverse reaction were observed. Reservation rates and incidence rates of adverse reaction were calculated in the two groups. ResultsIn levetiracetam combined with lamotrigine group, EngelⅠratio was 72.4%(71), EngelⅡratio was 17.3%(17), EngelⅢratio was 7.1%(7), and EngelⅣratio was 3.2%(3);in sodium valproate group, EngelⅠratio was 67.0%(59), EngelⅡratio was 21.6%(19), EngelⅢratio was 9.1%(8), and EngelⅣratio was 2.3%(2), and the difference was not statistically significant in the same grade of two groups (P > 0.05).Reservation rate and incidence rate of adverse reaction in levetiracetam combined with lamotrigine group were 90.8%(89) and 15.3%(15) respectively.While those in sodium valproate group were 80.7%(71) and 36.4%(32) respectively.The differences were statistically significant between the two groups (P < 0.05). ConclusionsLevetiracetam combined with lamotrigine treatment on postoperative patients with temporal lobe epilepsy may have better curative effects than sodium valproate treatment, and levetiracetam combined with lamotrigine has its advantage in reservation rate and less adverse reaction.
Objective The study was performed to compare the efficacy and effect on quality of life of sodium valproate (VPA) sustained-release tablets versus topiramate (TPM) in newly diagnosed adult symptomatic epilepsy. Methods This is aprospective, randomized controlled trial on 200 patients newly diagnosed as adult symptomatic epilepsy in Sichuan Province People’s Hospital druing September 2014 to December 2016. The patients were randomly divided into VPA group (n=110) and TPM group (n=90). Then we evaluated the efficacy, retention rate, adverse reactions, and quality of life of the two groups after one year of treatment. Results The total effective rate of VPA group was 69.1%, and the rate of no seizures was 38.2%; the total effective rate of TPM was 62.2%, and the rate of no seizures was 42.2%. No statistically significant difference in the effective rate and no seizure rate was found between the two groups. There was no statistical difference in the retention rate between the two groups(69.1% vs. 65.6%, P>0.05) . The incidence of adverse reactions of VPA was significantly lower than that of TPM (9.1%vs. 20%, P<0.05). The quality of life of the two groups was significantly improved from baseline before treatment. VPA group showed significantly better performance than TPM group on mood and cognitive improvement (P<0.05). Conclusion ① There was no significant difference in efficacy and retention rate between VPA sustained-release tablet and TPM on adult patients with symptomatic epilepsy after one year's treatment; ② The incidence of adverse reactions of TPM group was significantly higher than that of VPA group; ③ VPA sustained-release tablets and TPM can significantly improve the overall quality of life of patients, and VPA sustained-release tablets is significantly better than topiramate on the improvement of emotional and cognitive function.