ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect and safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC). MethodsThe computer-based search in Pubmed, Embase, Science Citation Index, and Cochrane for phaseⅡandⅢclinical trial related to sorafeinib in advanced HCC were conducted. Data abstraction and quality assessment were conducted according to enrolled criteria. Meta-analysis was performed by REVMAN 5.2 version, evidence recommendation was conducted by GRADE 3.6 version, which classify evidence level into:extremely low quality evidence, low quality evidence, moderate quality evidence, and high quality evidence. ResultsFive studies were included, 4 randomization control trial(RCT), 1 prospective no-randomization control clinical trial. Meta-analysis indicated that overall survival, time to progression, and disease control rate in sorafenib treatment group were higher than those in control group(P < 0.05). In addition, the incidence of hand-foot skin reaction, rash/desquamation, hypertention, and dirrahea in soafeinib treatment group were higher than those in control group(P < 0.05). ConclusionSorafeinib can prolong the overall survival, time to progression, and disease control rate in patients with advanced HCC, but there is still no evidence that sorafenib can improve tumor response in these patients.
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of Huaier and Sorafenib in treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)following radical resection. MethodsEighty-two patients with small HCC accepted radical liver resection and then taken Huaier or Sorafenib were collected retrospectively. These patients were divided into Huaier group(51 cases)and Sorafenib group(31 cases)according to the different administration drugs after operation. The baseline characteristics, tumor characteristics, survival rate, tumor recurrence rate, and side effects were compared between two groups. Results①There were no significant differences on the baseline demographic characteristics, liver function, and tumor characteristics between two groups(P > 0.05).②The overall survival rate and tumor-free survival rate had no significant differences between the Huaier group and the Sorafenib group(P=0.737, P=0.699).③The rate of recurrence or metastasis had no significant difference between the Huaier group and Sorafenib group(37.3% versus 32.3%, P=0.648). The most common site of the recurrence or metastasis was the liver and the lung followed.④There were only 5 cases suffered side effects after taking Huaier and no case needed Huaier discontinuance. However, 11 cases suffered side effects after taking Sorafenib and 3 cases needed Sorafenib discontinuance, and the rate of the side effect in the Sorafenib group was much higher than that in the Huaier group(35.5% versus 9.8%, P=0.026). ConclusionFor the small HCC who accepted radical liver resection, Huaier seems to be an effective and safe drug.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with sorafenib and TACE only treating the intermediate or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Chinese people. MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang Data for randomized controlled trials (RCT) on TACE combined with sorafenib (TACE combined with sorafenib group) and TACE (TACE alone group) from inception to December 2014 were searched. The literatures and data were screened and extracted. The meta analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. ResultsSix RCTs involving 498 patients with HCC were included. The results of meta analysis showed that the objective response rate[OR=2.28, 95% CI (1.52-3.42), P < 0.000 1] and the disease control rate[OR=6.62, 95% CI (4.12-10.65), P < 0.000 01] were higher, the 1-year survival rate[OR=3.27, 95% CI (2.06-5.22), P < 0.000 01] and 2-year survival rate[OR=4.55, 95% CI (2.28-9.07), P < 0.000 1] were longer, the safety and tolerability of adverse reactions were better in the TACE combined with sorafenib group as compared with the TACE alone group. ConclusionsIn Chinese people, compared with TACE alone group, TACE combined with sorafenib group have higher objective response rate, disease control rate, 1-year survival rate, and 2-year survival rate. However, due to the lower quality of included literatures, these conclusions should be treated cautiously.
Objective To systematically review the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and sorafenib (SORF) separately or combined in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MethodsWe searched the PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases for studies on HAIC and SORA separately or in combination in the treatment of advanced HCC from inception to November 1, 2021. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.3 software. ResultsA total of 21 studies involving 2 501 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the overall survival (OS) (HR=0.46, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.87, P=0.02), objective response rate (ORR) (OR=4.00, 95%CI 2.74 to 5.85, P<0.000 01) and disease control rate (DCR) (OR=2.20, 95%CI 1.30 to 3.75, P=0.004) were higher in the HAIC group than the SORF group, while the incidence of adverse reactions was not increased. However, HAIC combined with SORF showed no significant difference in OS, ORR, DCR or progression-free survival (PFS) compared with SORF alone. Moreover, combined treatment increased the adverse reactions of blood system. Conclusion The current study suggests that HAIC can improve OS, ORR and DCR in patients with advanced HCC; however, there is no additional benefit when combining SORF with HAIC. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.