Objective To investigate perfusion features of gastric antrum cancer by 64-multidetector CT and to assess the correlation between perfusion CT parameters and immunohistochemical markers of angiogenesis in gastric cancer. Methods Perfusion CT was performed in 30 patients with gastric antrum cancer （gastric antrum cancer group） and 24 patients with normal stomach (control group), and postoperative specimens were stained using a polyclonal antibody to VEGF and CD34. The correlation between perfusion parameters and microvessel density (MVD), and VEGF were analyzed. Results Blood volume (BV) increased in the gastric antrum cancer group (Plt;0.01). There was no significant difference in perfusion (PF), peak enhancement (PE), or time to peak (TTP) between the gastric antrum cancer and the normal groups (Pgt;0.05). BV was positively significantly correlated with MVD （r=0.522, P=0.02), but no significant correlation was found between PF （r=0.072, P=0.78), PE （r=0.253, P=0.31), or TTP （r=0.235, P=0.35) and MVD. No correlation was found between PF （r=-0.208, P=0.45), PE （r=-0.251, P=0.37), TTP（r=-0.284, P=0.31), or BV（r=-0.472, P=0.09) and VEGF.Conclusion Blood volume can evaluate the angiogenesis of tumor and perfusion CT can be a tool to assess microvessel status in gastric antrum cancer.
Objective To determine the role of multi-slice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) compared with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) in preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Methods Patients with rectal cancer from January to May 2009 in Department of Anal-Colorectal Surgery of West China Hospital were enrolled. All patients were preoperatively examined by both MSCT and TRUS for T and N staging, which were compared with postoperative pathological findings. Results The study population consisted of 81 patients. Regarding depth of tumor invasion, the accuracy of TRUS (88.89%) was not significantly higher than that of MSCT (77.78%), P=0.168. Regarding lymph node metastasis, the result of MSCT was more accurate than that of TRUS (66.67% vs. 48.15%, P=0.034). Conclusions Although TRUS remains the advantages in evaluating local invasion, the gap between MSCT and TRUS are significantly diminished. MSCT is superior to TRUS in evaluation of lymph node metastasis, however, further improvement on the diagnostic accuracies would be warranted in both modalities.