Objective To compare the difference of the changes of platelet counts after splenectomy between the patients with splenic rupture and patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, and to analyze the possible reasons and clinical significance. Methods The platelet count of 47 splenic rupture patients and 36 cirrhosis patients who had been carried out splenectomy from July 2008 to December 2009 in our hospital were counted, and the differences in platelet count and it’s change tendency of two groups were compared. Results In the splenic rupture group，the platelet count of all 47 patients increased abnormally after operation, the maxlmum value of platelet count among 300×109/L-600×109/L in 6 cases，600×109/L-900×109/L in 21 cases，and above 900×109/L in 20 cases. In the cirrhosis group，the maxlmum value of platelet count after operation was above 300×109/L in 26 cases，100×109/L-300×109/L in 8 cases，and below 100×109/L in 2 cases. The difference of maxlmum value of platelet count in the two groups had statistic significance（P=0.00）. Compared with the cirrhosis group, the platelet count increased more significant and decreased more slow in splenic rupture group（P＜0.05）.The abnormal days and rising range of platelet count were higher in patient with Child A than Child B and C（P=0.006，P=0.002）. Conclusions The change of platelet count after operation in splenic rupture group was obviously different from cirrhosis group because of the difference of the liver function and body situation of patients. To patients with splenic rupture or cirrhosis, appropriate treatment based on the platelet count and liver function could obtain good therapeutic effect.
ObjectiveTo summarize the treatment effects and success rate of spleen-preserving treatments for patients with splenic injury, and to explore the ideal spleen-preserving treatment for different types of splenic injury. MethodWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 136 patients with splenic injury who underwent spleen-preserving treatment in the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery between July 1998 and December 2010. And the treatment effects of different combined treatment methods were compared and studied. ResultsTwenty-seven patients were treated without surgery; 23 underwent vascular suture combined with fibrin glue treatment; 26 accepted splenic artery ligation, partial suture and fibrin glue treatment; 20 underwent ultrasonic scalpel partial splenectomy and wound spray fibrin glue treatment; 17 accepted splenic artery ligation and RF hemostatic cutter row spleen resection; and 23 accepted laparoscopic ultrasonic scalpel with partial splenectomy and wound spray fibrin glue treatment. Spleen-preserving succeeded in 131 cases (95.58%) and failed in 5 cases (4.42%) without any deaths. ConclusionsIn the treatment of splenic injury, the success rate of different methods of spleen-preserving is close. The success rate of combined use of several spleen-preserving methods together is higher. Under the principle of "Save lives first, and preserve spleen second", we should carry out individualized treatment plan for the patients based on patients' general condition, the extent and grade of splenic rupture, and medical equipment and technical conditions. For those medical units with good treatment conditions, combined spleen-preserving treatment can be performed.