Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of trimetazidine (TMZ) in the treatment of Stable Angina Pectoris (SAP). Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy and safety of Trimetazidine in treating patients with SAP were retrieved in the following databases as CNKI (1997 to June 2011), WanFang Data (1989 to June 2011), MEDLINE (1966 to June 2011), EMbase (1974 to June 2011), CBM (1989 to June 2011) and Cochrane Central Database (1989 to June 2011). The literature which met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected, data were extracted, the quality was evaluated, and meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 15 RCTs involving 1 500 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that, compared with the control group, TMZ was significantly superior in the following 5 aspects: the time to 1 mm drop of ST segment (WMD=0.84, 95%CI 0.74 to 0.93, P=0.000 01), duration of doing exercise (WMD=0.82, 95%CI 0.73 to 0.91, P=0.000 01), and time to onset of angina (WMD=1.18, 95%CI 0.87 to 1.50, Plt;0.000 01) in the treadmill test, weekly mean number of angina attacks (WMD= –1.79, 95%CI –1.93 to –1.66, Plt;0.000 01), and weekly side effects between TMZ and the control group (RR=0.83, 95%CI 0.52 to 1.32, P=0.42). Conclusion Based on current studies, TMZ is superior to other medicines in the control group for SAP at present, and it has no significant difference in side effects compared with the control group, so it is regarded as an effective and safe drug. For the quality restrictions and possible publication bias of the included studies, this conclusion needs to be confirmed by more high quality, large sample, multi-center, double blind RCTs.
ObjectiveTo analyze the influence factors of the stable angina pectoris patients' medication compliance based on health belief model. MethodsFrom January to December, 2013, 107 patients with stable angina pectoris were interviewed using the self-design questionnaires, and multiple stepwise linear regression statistical was used to analyze. ResultsThe influence factors of increasing medication compliance were as follows:"myocardial infarction can lead to death", "patients with stable angina pectoris may suffer a sudden myocardial infarction", "over the past year the number of the angina pectoris", "standard treatment is good for prevention of myocardial infarction", "suffering myocardial infarction, even if not dying, there is no more chance to live", "take medicine on time can get family's praise", and "among the people that I know there are patients who die of myocardial infarction". The partial regression coefficients were 0.245, 0.251, 0.248, 0.099, 0.234, 0.162, 0.095, respectively; while "worry about side effects of the drugs", "can't afford the medicine", the partial regression coefficients were -0.164 and -0.114. ConclusionHealth belief model is helpful for general practitioners to evaluate the effect factors of medication compliance on stable angina pectoris.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of Xueshuantong combined with conventional western medicine for angina pectoris in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients. MethodsWe searched the Cochrane Library (2013.12), Medline (2013.10), EMbase (unlimited-2013.10), China Nation Knowledge Infrastructure (unlimited-2013.10) and the Wanfang Database (unlimitied-2013.10), Weipu Database (unlimited-2013.10), and CBM (unlimited-2013.10) on computers for parallel group randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing Xueshuantong and placebo for patients with angina pectoris. Three researchers selected the trials based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria and then extracted the data, assessed the quality of each trial independently. After cross checking, the Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.1 software was used to perform Meta-analysis. ResultsThirteen RCTs and a total of 1 298 participants were involved. Meta-analysis showed that Xueshuantong combined with the conventional western medicine had better curative effect on angina pectoris for CHD than conventional therapy; stable angina pectoris [RR=1.24, 95%CI (1.12, 1.37), P<0.000 1]; unstable angina pectoris [RR=1.22, 95%CI (1.15, 1.29), P<0.000 01]. There was also significant difference in total curative effect between the two groups [RR=1.22, 95%CI (1.16, 1.29), P<0.000 01]. Xueshuantong also had better curative effect on improving performance of electrocardiogtram (ECG): stable angina pectoris [RR=1.30, 95%CI (1.11, 1.51), P=0.000 8]; unstable angina pectoris [RR=1.18, 95%CI (1.10, 1.28), P<0.000 1]. There was also significant difference in total curative effect on improving performance of ECG between the two groups [RR=1.21, 95%CI (1.13, 1.29), P<0.000 01]. But there was no significant difference in adverse effects rate between the two groups [RR=4.50, 95%CI (0.99, 20.53), P=0.05]. ConclusionCompared with conventional therapy, Xueshuantong combined with conventional western medicine has better curative effect with improved performance of ECG. The adverse effect rate between the two groups is not significantly different. But because of the small scale, inferior quality, and bias risk of these trials, large-scale, rational designed, multicenter RCTs are needed to confirm our conclusions.