Objective To introduce the experience of treating 85 cases of stanford type B aortic dissection by endovascular implantment of stent-grafts，to provide more clinical evidence for endovascular repairment for stanford B type aortic dissections.Methods Imaging examination by computed tomography angiography （CTA） were done to obtain anatomical detail of dissection. Stent-grafts were implanted under the guide of DSA in all cases. The patients were followed-up for 3 months，6 months，12 months，and then annually by CTA examination to observe the complications and morphological changes of the aneurysm.Results The technical success rate was 95.3%（81/85），and the clinical success rate was 91.8%（78/85）. Eight patients died after operation in hospital，who were all in acute phase，and no patients of chronic phase died，there had statistic differences （P＜0.05）. The perioperative complications’ incidence of endovascular repair which happened in patients of acute phase was higher than that patients of chronic phase （38.2% vs.13.3%，P＜0.05）. Left subclavian artery were covered completely for 13 cases，and partially covered for 22 cases，there was no obvious cerebralvascular insufficiency. There were 41 patients of whom other tears which were not covered during operation exsited at abdominal aortic and one year following-up showed that at those section thromblization of false cavity was not clear. The rest of patients whose abdominal aortic didn’t exist tears hadn’t new tears appeared.Conclusions Regardless in the acute or chronic stage，endovascular therapy is an effective mathod of treating stanford type B dissection. However，implanting stent-grafts have a higher security in chronic period than doing that in acute period. If the right carotid artery，vertebra and Willis ring are smoothly，there is little need to set up a by-pass to left subclavian artery before endovascular repairment. For those patients that other uncovered tears exited，following-up should be a must，and further strategy should be studied and prepared in advance.
ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) with hostile stent-graft proximal landing zone. MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 13 patients with BTAI with hostile stent-graft proximal landing zone treated by TEVAR between December 2007 and December 2014. There were 10 males and 3 females with the mean age of 44 years (range, 24-64 years). The imaging examination indicated Stanford type B aortic dissection in 7 cases, pseudoaneurysm in 3 cases, aneurysm in 1 case, and penetrating ulcer in 2 cases. According to the partition method of thoracic aortic lesion by Mitchell, 8 cases underwent stent-graft with left subclavian artery (LSA) coverage, 3 underwent chimney stents for LSA, and 2 for left common carotid artery (LCCA). In 2 cases receiving chimney TEVAR involving LCCA, one underwent steel coils at the proximal segment of LSA to avoid type II endoleak and the other underwent in situ fenestration for endovascular reconstruction of LSA. ResultsAll TEVAR procedures were successfully performed. The mean operation time was 1.8 hours (range, 1-3 hours); the mean intraoperative blood loss was 120 mL (range, 30-200 mL); and the mean hospitalization time was 15 days (range, 7-37 days). No perioperative death and paraplegia occurred. The patients were followed up 3-30 months (mean, 18 months). Type I endoleak occurred in 1 case during operation and spontaneously healed within 6 months. Hematoma at brachial puncture site with median nerve compression symptoms occurred in 1 case at 3 weeks after operation; ultrasound examination showed brachial artery pseudoaneurysm and thrombosis, and satisfactory recovery was obtained after pseudoaneurysmectomy. No obvious chest pain, shortness of breath, left upper limbs weakness, numbness, and dizziness symptoms were observed. Imaging examination revealed that stentgraft and branched stent remained in stable condition. Meanwhile the blood flow was unobstructed. No lesions expanded and ruptured. No new death, bacterial infection, or other serious complications occurred. ConclusionAccording to Mitchell method, individualized plan may be the key to a promising result. More patients and further follow-up need to be included, studied, and observed.