Objective To compare the efficacy of incision healing by abdominal wall closure measure without suturing subcutaneous fat layer and the traditional abdominal wall closure measure. Methods Four hundreds patients underwent operation of abdominal median incision and abdominal paramedian incision from Sep. 2010 to Sep. 2012 in our department were randomly assigned to observation group （n=199） and control group （n=201）. The patients in obser- vation group underwent abdominal wall closure measure without suturing subcutaneous fat layer， and those of control group were subjected to abdominal wall closure by traditional layer suture technique. Comparison of efficacy of incision healing in the 2 groups was performed. Results The incidences of fat liquefication 〔1 （0.5%） vs.18 （9.0%）〕， incision swelling 〔3 （1.5%） vs.16 （8.0%）〕， incision induration 〔1 （0.5%） vs.15 （7.5%）〕， and dehiscence of wound 〔0 （0） vs.9 （4.5%）〕 in observation group were significantly lower than those of control group （P＜0.01）， but there was no significant difference in incidence of subcutaneous hematoma 〔2 （1.0%） vs.0 （0）， P＞0.05〕. The rate of primary healing in obser-vation group was significantly higher than those of control group 〔199 （100%） vs.186 （92.5%）， P＜0.01〕. Duration of abdominal closure 〔（13.0±1.6） min vs.（18.0±2.2） min〕 and postoperative hospital stay 〔（7.7±1.3） days vs.（9.6±1.9） days〕 were all shorter than those of control group （P＜0.01）. Conclusion The abdominal wall closure measure without suturing subcutaneous fat layer is obviously more effective to the traditional layer suture technique， which is a suture way worthy to spread.