Objective To assess the clinical efficacy and treatment-induced side effects of intravesically administered bacillus calmette-guerin (BCG) plus chemotherapy following TURB-t in patients with superficial bladder cancer compared with BCG alone.Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from PubMed (1950 to December 2006), Ovid (1966 to December 2006), EMbase (1984 to December 2006), The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2006), CBM (1978 to 2006) and VIP (1989 to 2006). We also handsearched relevant published and unpublished reports as well as their references.The quality of included trials was evaluated by two reviewers. We used The Cochrane Collaboration’ s RevMan 4.2.9 software for statistical analysis. Results Four studies involving 681 patients were included. Meta-analyses showed that, in patients with Ta and T1 bladder cancer, there was a significant difference in the recurrence rate between intravesically administered BCG plus chemotherapy and BCG alone (RR 0.69, 95%CI 0.53 to 0.90). In patients with Tis bladder cancer, no significant difference was found in the recurrence rate between the two groups (RR 1.22, 95%CI 0.97 to 1.54). In patients with Ta, T1 and Tis bladder cancer, no statistically significant difference was found in the incidence of side effects (RR 0.85, 95%CI 0.70 to 1.03). Conclusion Compared with BCG alone, intravesically administered BCG plus chemotherapy in patients with Ta and T1 superficial bladder cancer can reduce the incidence of tumor recurrence more effectively. For patients with Tis bladder cancer, the two therapeutic regimens do not differ in the incidence of tumor recurrence. The two regimens have similar side effects. There is a moderate possibil ity of selection bias, performance bias and publ ication bias in the small number of included studies, which weakens the strength of the evidence of our results. Better evidence from more high-quality double-blind randomized controlled trials is needed.
Objective To determine whether intravesically administered Adriamycin can prevent superficial bladder tumor to recur through assessing the efficacy of with intravesical Adriamycin and without intravesical Adriamycin after TURB-t. Method The search strategy was made according to the demand of Cochrane Collaboration. Medline, Embase，CBMdisc and the Cochrane Library were searched for RCTs. Data were extracted by two reviewers using the designed extraction form. RevMan were used for data management and analysis. Results Thirty three relevant trials were searched, of which eighteen trials were included and fifteen trials were excluded. Meta-analysis showed intravesically administered Pirarnbicin (THP), Epirubicin (EPI) and Adriamycin (ADM) can reduce the recurrence rate of superficial bladder cancer after operation during one or two years. Conclusions Intravesically administered THP, EPI and ADM can reduce the recurrence rate of superficial bladder cancer after TUPB-t’s operation during one or two years. In addition, the factors affecting the prognosis should be performed, such as the dosage of irrigation of bladder, reserving time and the course.
Objective To assess the efficacy and the treatment-induced side effects of intravesically administered Epirubicin (EPI) following TUR in patients with Ta and T1 superficial bladder cancer compared to TUR alone. Methods According to the Cochrane reviewer’s handbook, included studies were those on patients with histologically confirmed Ta and T1 bladder cancer. EPI and EPI derivatives, dose and schedule would be considerd appropriate for inclusion. The search strategy was developed according to the Collaborative Review Group search strategy. Medline, EMbase, CBMdisc and the Cochrane library, articles of conference proceedings, and academic collections were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCT comparing intravesical EPI following TUR with TUR alone. Data were extracted from each identified paper independently by two reviewers. Trials were assessed for quality according to the method of Jadad scale. RevMan4.2 software developed by the Cochrane Collaboration was used for satistical analysis. Results Two hundred and thirteen related articles were identified, but only 10 were included in our systematic review. 3 articles were high quality and the rest were low. The pooled RR=1.51 (95%CI 1.32 to 1.72) and the pooled RR=1.49 (95%CI 1.35 to 1.66) in patients with Ta and T1 bladdercancer at 1 and 2 years respectively; The pooled RR=1.34 (95%CI 1.22 to 1.48) when comparing relative efficacy of intravesical EPI (drug doselt;50 mg) following TUR with TUR alone; The pooled RR=1.63 (95%CI 1.48 to 1.79) when comparing relative efficacy of intravesical EPI (drug dosegt;50 mg) following TUR with TUR alone. RR=1.49 (95%CI 1.33 to 1.66) and RR=1.56 (95%CI 1.36 to 1.84) when comparing relative efficacy of single intravesical EPI following TUR with TUR alone respectively. RR=0.79 (95%CI 0.53 to 1.17) when comparing the incidence of disease progression of intravesical doxorubicin following TUR with TUR alone. RR=4.34 (95%CI 2.62 to 7.19) when comparing side effect of intravesical EPI following TUR with TUR alone. Conclusions Intravesically administered EPI following TUR in patients with Ta and T1 superficial bladder cancer may reduce the incidence of tumour recurrence, but cannot reduce the incidence of disease progreesion. Intravesically administered EPI following TUR has some side effects but can be tolerated and has no influence on the life of patients.