Objective To compare the clinical effects of traditional manual and robot-assisted implantation of cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fracture. Methods The medical records of patients with femoral neck fracture in Department of Orthopaedics, People’s Hospital of Deyang City were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups, including the traditional manual implantation group from January to December 2018 and the robot-assisted implantation group from May 2019 to May 2020. The clinical therapeutic efficacy of the two groups were compared. Harris hip function score was used to evaluate hip function. Results A total of 85 patients were included. All patients had closed fractures. There were 45 cases in the traditional manual implantation group and 40 cases in the robot-assisted implantation group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in preoperative waiting time, operation time, hospitalization time, fracture healing time, complications within one year after operation, or Harris hip function score one year after operation (P>0.05). The placement nail time [(11.1±2.0) vs. (23.8±2.3) min; t=27.142, P<0.001], frequency of guide pin insertion [(4.7±1.2) vs. (11.4±1.7) times; t=20.640, P<0.001], frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy [(10.8±1.7) vs. (21.0±1.8) times; t=26.990, P<0.001] and intraoperative blood loss [(8.1±2.0) vs. (12.0±1.7) mL; t=9.711, P<0.001] in the robot-assisted implantation group were less than those in the traditional manual implantation group. No wound infection or neurovascular injury was found in the two groups. Conclusion Robot-assisted implantation of cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fracture has the advantages of less fluoroscopy, fewer guide pin insertion, less blood loss, more accurate screw placement than the traditional manual implantation of cannulated screws.
Objective To analyze the clinical effect of TINAVI robotic system-assisted pedicle screw internal fixation for thoracolumbar fracture with a Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) of 4. Methods A total of 38 patients with TLICS 4 thoracolumbar fracture treated between January 2019 and January 2021 who met the selection criteria of Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. According to the results of doctor-patient communication, 18 cases were treated with robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (robot group), and 20 cases were treated with traditional conservative treatment (non-surgical group). Complications during hospitalization were observed. After discharge, the patients in the two groups were followed up by telephone and outpatient clinic. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score at admission, at discharge, and 3 and 6 months after discharge, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score 3 and 6 months after discharge were compared between the two groups. Results There were no statistically significant difference in age, sex, body mass index or distribution of injured vertebrae segment between the two groups (P>0.05). No serious complication occurred in any group during hospitalization. The difference in the length of hospital stay between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The bed rest in the robot group was shorter than that in the non-surgical group [(4.83±0.92) vs. (43.05±2.70) d, P<0.05]. The VAS scores at discharge (2.50±0.51 vs. 5.05±1.00), 3 months after discharge (1.83±0.71 vs. 3.10±0.72) and 6 months after discharge (1.50±0.51 vs. 1.90±0.79) in the robot group were lower than those in the non-surgical group (P<0.05). The ODI scores 3 months after discharge (21.89±1.41 vs. 30.40±3.00) and 6 months after discharge (10.72±2.37 vs. 12.10±2.29) in the robot group were significantly lower than those in the non-surgical group (P<0.05). Conclusion For patients with TLICS 4 thoracolumbar fracture, the early clinical effect of robot-assisted surgical treatment is better than that of non-surgical treatment.