Objective To evaluate the short-term effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic versus conventional open left hepatectomy. Methods Databases including CENTRAL (Issue 1, 2012), MEDLINE/PubMed (1978 to 2012), EMbase (1966 to 2012), CBM (1978 to 2012), CNKI (1979 to 2012) and the Chinese Medical Association Figures Journal Systems (1990 to 2012) were searched to collect clinical trials on laparoscopic versus conventional open left hepatectomy. Relevant proceedings and references of the included studies were also retrieved manually. According to the inclusion criteria, two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed quality. Then meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan5.0 software. Results No randomized controlled trials were collected, and a total of 5 clinical concurrent controlled trials involving 319 patients were included finally. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the conventional open group, the laparoscopic group was longer in the operation time (WMD=40.89, 95%CI 29.39 to 55.38, Plt;0.000 01), and was lower in the intraoperative blood loss (WMD=−107.84, 95%CI −208.96 to −6.73, Plt;0.04); but there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of hospital stays (WMD=−3.78, 95%CI −9.60 to 2.04, P=0.20) or postoperative complications (WMD=0.69, 95%CI 0.37 to 1.29, P=0.25). Conclusion As a minimally invasive technique, laparoscopic left hepatectomy has advantages of small abdominal incision and less intraoperative blood loss, and it is helpful to improve the quality of life for patients. Due to the limitation of quantity and quality of the included studies, it is hard to estimate the impact of bias on the reliability of this conclusion. We advise to perform more high quality, large scale and multicenter studies with adequate follow-up in the future.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous ethanol injection for hepatocellular carcinomas of 3 cm or less. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library issue 2, 2008), PubMed (1966 to 2008), EMbase (1966 to 2008), CBMdisc (1978 to 2008), and CNKI (1979 to 2008) were electronically searched. We hand searched related published and unpublished data and their references. Randomized controlled trials of percutaneous ethanol injection to treat hepatocellular carcinomas of 3 cm or less were included. Data were extracted and evaluated by two reviewers independently using a designed extraction form. RevMan 4.2.10 software was used for data analysis. Results Seven RCTs involving 891 patients were included. We conducted subgroup analyses based on outcome measures and interventions. Compared with RFA, for treatment of hepatocellular carcinomas of 3 cm or less, PEI showed statistical differences in one and three-year survival rates and one and three-year local recurrence rates after treatment(RR=0.95, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.00; RR=0.80, 95%CI 0.71 to 0.91; RR=2.18, 95%CI 1.11 to 4.30; RR=2.59, 95%CI 1.55 to 4.32). As for hepatocellular carcinomas of 2-3 cm, PEI showed statistical difference in three year cancer free survival rates after treatment (RR=0.47, 95%CI 0.24 to 0.93) .Conclusion Considering the relatively poor quality of most included trials and small sample size, insufficient evidence was obtained in this systematic review. Therefore, more randomized controlled trials with high quality are still needed to assess and verify the efficacy and safety of this treatment.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of the subtotal splenectomy versus total splenectomy with gastroesophageal devascularization for patients of hepatic cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Methods We searched the Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2008), MEDLINE (1966 to August, 2008), EMbase (1966 to August, 2008), the China Biological Medicine Database (1978 to August, 2008), Chinese Sci-tech Periodical Full-text Database (1989 to August, 2008) and Chinese Periodical Full-text Database (1994 to August, 2008), as well as hand-searched several related journals and conference proceedings for the randomized controlled trials involving the comparison of the efficacy of the subtotal splenectomy with the total splenectomy for the patients of the hepatic cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Results Three studies involving 136 patients were identified. The results of two studies indicated that both of the subtotal splenectomy increased less the peripheral platelet count and there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups [WMD= – 39.27, 95%CI (– 62.57, – 15.97)]. Two studies indicated that the serum tuftsin level was increased significantly after the subtotal splenectomy [WMD= 165.28, 95%CI (159.36, 171.21)]. One study indicated that both of the subtotal splenectomy and total splenectomy with gastroesophageal devascularization increased the peripheral white blood cell count and there was statistical difference between the two groups [WMD= – 0.93, 95%CI (– 1.52, – 0.34)]. There was no statistical difference in serum IgA level between the two groups. One study indicated the average fever time after the total splenectomy was longer than the subtotal splenectomy; there was statistical differences in 5 years survival rate between the two groups (Plt;0.05). Conclusions After the subtotal splenectomy the hypersplenism of patients suffered from hepatic cirrhosis and portal hypertension was corrected obviously and the blood cells were increased smoothly so that high blood viscosity was prevented and occurrence of the thrombotic diseases was decreased. And the immune system reserve functions of the patients with hepatic cirrhosis and portal hypertension were maintained. More randomized controlled trials, with large sample sizes, may lead to more accurate results.