ObjectiveTo analyze the efficacy, hospitalization cost and cost-effect of different treatments for multiple myeloma, so as to provide references for the treatment and development medical insurance payment policy of multiple myeloma.MethodsA total of 60 cases of multiple myeloma patients who were treated in the General Hospital of Shenyang Military Command from January 1st, 2013 to December 31st, 2017 were included. According to the treatment method, they were categorized into the traditional treatment group (n=37) and novel drug treatment group (n=23). The total response rate and hospitalisation expenses for patients with medical insurance of the two groups were calculated and compared, and cost-effectiveness analysis was then performed.ResultsThe overall response rate in patients in traditional treatment group was 56.76% (21/37), and in novel drug treatment group was 82.61% (19/23) (χ2=4.366, P=0.039). The annual average drug fee, annual average novel drug fee, secondary average drug fee, secondary average novel drug fee, annual average total cost, and secondary average total cost of the medical insurance patients in the novel drug treatment group were significantly higher than those in the traditional treatment group (P<0.05). The annual average cost of personal and coordinated payment for the medical insurance patients in the novel drug treatment group were 172 229.53 yuan and 48 237.51 yuan, respectively, which were significantly higher than the traditional treatment group (P<0.01). The cost-effectiveness ratio of the traditional treatment group was 884.44 yuan/%, the novel drug treatment group was 2 821.80 yuan/%, the cost-effective incremental ratio was 7 075.75 yuan/%, the incremental cost-effective ratio was 7 075.75 yuan/%, and the sensitivity analysis was consistent with the results.ConclusionsThe total response rate of novel drug treatment is significantly higher than traditional treatment. However, novel drug treatment costs higher, and patient's economic burden is also higher. The traditional treatment is superior to novel drug treatment in cost-effectiveness analysis.
After pirfenidone and nintedanib showed efficacy, drug treatment for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis began to focused on anti-fibrosis. Current research on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis mainly focus on the pathogenesis and therapeutic targets, and more targeted drugs are gradually entering clinical trials. This article summarizes the results of recent studies on the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with pirfenidone and nintedanib alone or in combination by searching the literature, and reviews the mechanism and test results of the new target anti-fibrosis drugs based on molecular biology that are currently undergoing clinical research in various phases, and aims to provide a basis for how to choose drugs to treat idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.
Angiopoietin-like protein (ANGPTL), a group of secreted glycoproteins, is widely expressed in vivo and is involved in many pathophysiological processes such as glycolipid metabolism, stem cell growth, local inflammation, vascular leakage and angiogenesis. Many kinds of ANGPTL are closely related to the occurrence and development of diabetic retinopathy (DR), especially ANGPTL4, which has gradually become a new hotspot in the field of DR Research. ANGPTL is involved in glucose metabolism and lipid metabolism, promotes increased vascular permeability, pathological angiogenesis, and participates in intraocular inflammation. ANGPTL is a promising molecular target. It can not only be used as a biomarker to predict the occurrence and progression of DR, but also provide new ideas for the treatment of DR by making antibody drugs to interfere with this molecule.