Objective To study the effectiveness of anterior cruciate l igament (ACL) reconstruction using autologous periosteum wrapping tendon allograft by comparing with using simple tendon allograft. Methods Between March 2008 and November 2008, 68 patients with ACL injury were treated, who were in accordance with the inclusion criteria. They were divided into 2 groups randomly according to different treatment methods: ACL was reconstructed with autologous periosteum wrapping tendon allograft in 31 patients (test group) and with simple tendon allograft (control group) in 37 patients. There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, the cause of injury, and functional score preoperatively between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction was performed in 2 groups. Results Little exudation at tibial tunnel incision was found in 1 case respectively in both groups at 2 weeks after operation and was cured by dressing change and antibiotics. The other incisions healed by first intention. The patients were followed up 24-29 months (mean, 26 months) in the test group and 24-32 months (mean, 27 months) in the control group. CT showed bone tunnel enlargement in both groups at 2 years after operation, but the rate of the tunnel enlargement was less inthe test group (5/31, 16.1%) than in the control group (14/37, 37.8%), showing significant difference (χ2=3.948, P=0.047). At 2 years after operation, the results of Lachman test and pivot shift test were negative in 23 cases (74.2%) and 25 cases (80.6%) of the test group, and in 26 cases (70.3%) and 30 cases (81.1%) of the control group, respectively. KT-1000 examination showed the displacement of the test group [(1.74 ± 0.88) mm] was less than that of the control group [(2.36 ± 0.83) mm], showing significant difference (t= —2.979, P=0.004). There was no significant difference in Lysholm score, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, Tegner score, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score between 2 groups at 2 years after operation (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion Compared with simple tendon allograft, ACL reconstruction with autologous periosteum wrapping tendon allograft can improve tendon-bone heal ing, and decrease the rate of bone tunnel enlargement, so it has good short-term outcome.
Objective To observe the long-term effectiveness of tendon allograft to repair tendon defect. Methods Between October 1996 and September 1999, 24 patients with tendon defect were treated with tendon allograft which was cultured with deoxyguanosine and preserved at low-temperature or ultra-deep-low-temperature. There were 19 males and 5 females, aged from 12 to 46 years with an average of 25.9 years. These patients included 7 cases of total extensor tendon defect of 2nd-5th fingers, 7 cases of index finger extensor tendon defect, 3 cases of deep flexor tendon defect of 2nd- 5th fingers, 1 case of ring finger deep flexor tendon defect, 3 cases of long extensor tendon defect of 2nd-5th toes, 2 cases of long extensor hallucis tendon defect, and 1 case of shoulder adduction missing. The sizes of tendon defect ranged from 5 to 15 cm. The mean time from injury to operation was 1.3 months (range, 2 hours to 3 months). Results Incisions healed by first intention. No deep infection, infectious diseases, and obvious immune rejection occurred. All patients were followed up from 10 to 12 years with an average of 10.8 years. When compared with contralateral sides, at 10 years of follow-up, 1 patient lost 6-10° flexion function; after 10.6 years, flexion tendon releasing was performed; allografted tendon had normal color and elasticity with decreased diameter and with mild and moderate adherence; and after releasing, function was improved. According to Hand Surgery Association assessment standard, the results were excellent in 12 cases, good in 6, and poor in 6; the excellent and good rate was 75%. Conclusion Tendon allograft which is cultured with deoxyguanosine and preserved at low-temperature or ultra-deep-low-temperature is safe to use in cl inical, which has good long-term effectiveness in treating tendon defect.
【Abstract】 Objective To explore the reasons of tendon adhesions post tendon allograft. Methods From May1990 to June 2000, 85 cases receiving tendon allograft were given tenolysis because of tendon adhesions. There were 76 males and 9 females, with an average age of 24.5 years (8-46 years). Injury was caused by machine in 38 cases, electric in 32 cases, cut in 4 cases, explosion in 4 cases and extremity mutilation in 7 cases; including 66 cases of flexor tendon deficit and 19 cases of extensor tendon deficit. Six cases had 1 tendon deficit, 79 cases had tendon deficit of more than 2. The defect region ranged from I to V. The total mobil ity of the joint was less than 220° in 73 cases. The impairment of skin, bone, nerve and vascular were treated before tendon allograft. Results Because TAM was less than 50% of TPM, the patients were given tenolysis 4-15 months after operation. And the mobil ization began at the first day after operation to improve the range of active movement. Patients were followed up 7-17 years (mean 12.7 years). TAM and TPM were in accord. Mean total mobil ity of joint was200°. Conclusion The serious of primary hurt is the important factors of tendon adhesion. Improvement of tendon selected, treatment and early mobil ization can rel ieve the tendon adhesion.