Objective To learn the current situation of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) systematic reviews/meta-analyses published in Chinese journals. Methods All TCM systematic reviews/meta-analyses published from 1978 to July 31, 2009 were searched in the Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM). According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, relevant information was extracted on the basis of research purpose. Meanwhile, publication year, journal name, author’s district, number of authors and their articles, types of diseases and interventions were took as the indexes, and then descriptive analysis was performed using SPSS 15.0 software. Results A total of 245 articles including 238 in Chinese and 7 in English were included. All of them were published in 117 different journals from 1998 to 2008, showing an accelerating growth trend of article number. In addition to only one article with first author from Germany, the first author of other 244 were from 24 domestic provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities); the number of authors ranged from 1 to 11; a total of 186 people had published articles as first author, and the number of their published articles ranged from 1 to 29. There were 16 types of diseases according to the International Classification of Diseases 10th Edition (ICD-10). Totally, 218 articles took drugs as interventions (including 106 listed drugs, 25 self-made prescriptions, 70 related to both listed drugs and self-made prescriptions, and 17 without reporting detailed interventions), accounting for 89%; and 27 articles were about non-drug interventions (including 26 about acupuncture and 1 about massage), accounting for 11%. Most (95.8%) of the articles about self-made prescriptions and listed drugs/self-made prescriptions adopted inappropriate pooled analyses. Conclusion Evidence-based medicine has been spread into the field of TCM, the number of TCM systematic reviews/meta-analyses shows an accelerated growth trend. The types of diseases discussed in the literature were almost the same as the diseases those could be effectively treated by TCM, but there existed imbalance in districts. In the future, systematic review/meta-analysis on drug intervention should aim at Chinese patent medicines and single medicines rather than self-made prescriptions, and should pay more attention to advantageous drugs and advantageous treatments of diseases. Moreover, importance should be also attached to clinical heterogeneity controlling when using acupuncture as a non-drug intervention.
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of Chinese medicinal herbs for asymptomatic hepatitis B virus(HBV) infection. Data Source The trials registers of the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group, the Cochrane Library and the Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field were searched in combination with MEDLINE, EMBASE, and handsearches of Chinese journals and conference proceedings. Data Selection Randomized clinical trials with 3 months follow-up comparing Chinese medicinal herbs versus placebo, no intervention, non-specific treatment, or interferon treatment for asymptomatic HBV carriers were included. No language and blinding limitations were applied. Data Extraction Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. The methodological quality of trials was assessed by the Jadad-scale plus allocation concealment. Results Three randomized clinical trials (307 patients) with low methodological quality following patients for three months or more after the end of treatment were included. Herbal compound Jianpi Wenshen recipe showed significant effects on clearance of HBV markers compared to interferon: relative risk 2.40 (95 % CI 1.01 to 5.72) for clearance of serum HBsAg, and 2.54 (1.13 to 5.70) for seroconversion of HBeAg to anti-HBe. Phyllanthus amarus and Astragalus membranaceus showed no significant antiviral effect compared with placebo. Analysis of pooling eight randomized clinical trials with less than three months follow-up did not show a significant benefit of Chinese medicinal herbs on viral markers. No serious adverse event was observed. Conclusions There is insufficient evidence for treatment of asymptomatic HBVcarriers using Chinese medicinal herbs due to the low quality of the trials. Further randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trials are needed.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) plus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) compared with TACE alone, in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CANCERLIT, CBM, CNKI and VIP were searched electronically. Relevant journals and conference proceedings were also handsearched. The quality of included studies was assessed according to the criteria recommended by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, and meta-analyses were performed for homogeneous studies using The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.10 software. Subgroup analyses by frequency of TACE (lt;3 or ≥3 times) were also performed. Results Thirty seven trials, all published in China, involving 2 653 participants were included. The quality of 2 studies was graded B (medium) and that of the other 35 was graded C (low). Meta-analyses showed that TCM plus TACE, compared with TACE alone, could significantly improve survival, tumor response (complete and partial), quality of life and clinical symptoms, and was also associated with a lower incidence of adverse reactions. Subgroup analyses indicated that, patients with less than three TACE had more significant improvement in survival and clinical symptoms, while patients with three or more TACE had more significant improvement in tumor response and quality of life. The incidence of adverse reactions was similar between these two different frequencies of TACE. Conclusions The treatment regimen of TCM plus TACE is superior to TACE alone in patients with unresectable HCC. As the existing data have a high risk of bias, the current evidence is insufficient to define the efficacy of the combination treatment, and further large-scale, high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed.
Intensive discussions and debates concerning whether we should and how to apply evidence-based medicine (EBM) research in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) have arisen worldwide. We always hold the opinion: TCM needs EBM; the evidence from EBM is not limited to randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews; innovative methodological studies are urged based on the characteristics of TCM theoretically and clinically. Based on the methodological training and studies in this area, the authors discussed how to promote the evidence based TCM from five aspects including completing clinical trial procedure, reporting clinical trials according to international standards, reviewing the current clinical studies on TCM systematically, promoting the methodological research and academic exchange and better evidence (knowledge) management.
Objective To investigate inpatient disease constitution in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region from 2008 to 2010, in order to provide baseline data for medicine allocation of hospitals in western China and development of TCM hospitals. Methods A questionnaire combined with a subject interview was carried out, and the case records of inpatients from 2008 to 2010 were collected. The diseases in discharge records were classified according to International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) based on the first diagnosis. Data including general information of the inpatients, discharge diagnosis etc. were rearranged and analyzed by Excel software. Results a) The top four systematic diseases seen commonly from 2008 to 2010 were as follows: circulatory system diseases, musculoskeletal system and connective tissue diseases, respiratory system diseases and digestive system diseases. The top four single diseases were hypertension, intervertebral disc disease, diabetes, bronchitis, emphysema and other chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases. Respiratory system diseases ranked the third in 2009 and 2010 from the fourth in 2008, and circulatory system diseases had ranked the first during the past three years; b) The following diseases as hypertension, bronchial emphysema and other chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, diabetes, fractures, airway (bronchus, lung) cancer, and viral hepatitis were commonly seen in males rather than in females. By contrast, intervertebral disc disease, gallstone disease and cholecystitis, and anemia were commonly seen in females; and c) Hypertension was commonly seen in the aged above 60 years old; intervertebral disc disease mainly focused on the patients at the age of 15 to 59; and bronchial emphysema and other chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, airway (bronchus, lung) cancer involved in the patients who were mostly over 60 years old. Conclusion a) The top four systematic diseases seen commonly from 2008to 2010 are as follows: circulatory system diseases, musculoskeletal system and connective tissue diseases, respiratory system diseases and digestive system diseases. The top four single diseases are hypertension, intervertebral disc disease, diabetes, bronchitis, emphysema and other chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases. So these diseases should be taken into well consideration when making development plans by hospital and complementing essential drugs list by local development; b) Chronic diseases become the main disease for troubling Xinjiang population; and c) Male and female are susceptible to different diseases which should be rationally avoided in order to prevent the induced occurrence.
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicines for chronic functional constipation. Methods We searched CNKI (1989 to November, 2009), CBM (1989 to November, 2009), VIP (1989 to November, 2009), Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2009), PubMed (1966 to November, 2009) and EMbase (1986 to November, 2009). All randomized and quasi-randomized clinical trials of treating chronic functional constipation with Chinese herbal medicines versus untreated, placebo or western drug groups were included. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. The methodological quality of trials was evaluated with Cochrane Handbook 5.0.2 criteria. Meta-analyses were conducted by the RevMan 5.0 software. Results Twenty-one trials involving 2 602 patients were included. The Meta-analysis results showed that: Chinese herbal medicines improved both syndromes and colonic transit function of recipients; moreover, it is superior to both gastrointestinal prokinetic agent in effective rate (RR=1.18, 95%CI 1.12 to 1.25), healing rate (RR=1.59, 95%CI 1.35 to 1.88), and cathartic in effective rate (RR=1.18, 95%CI 1.10 to 1.27), healing rate (RR=1.16, 95%CI 1.29 to 2.10). Integration of Chinese herbal medicines and gastrointestinal prokinetic agent is superior to gastrointestinal prokinetic agent in effective rate (RR=1.21 95%CI 1.09 to 1.34) and healing rate (RR=1.41, 95%CI 1.11 to 1.79). Conclusion Some Chinese herbal medicines may be effective and safe in treating chronic functional constipation, which can not be bly proved at present for lack of studies with high quality.
Objective To analyze the heterogeneity of systematic reviews (SRs)/Meta-analysis on traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), and explore strategies for addressing heterogeneity correctly during the process of conducting TCM related to systematic reviews (SRs). Methods Both electronic and hand searches were used to identify TCM SRs in CBM, CNKI, VIP database, and Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine. Two researchers performed data extracting and heterogeneity evaluation independently. Results A total of 115 TCM SRs were included, involving 17 types of diseases, among which the cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases were the most addressed (n=36, 31.30%). There were 35.65% (n=41) of SRs which integrated two or more types of studies; interventions of the included studies were inconsistent in 53.91% (n=62) of TCM SRs; control groups of the included studies were completely different in 60 (52.17%) SRs; and 8.7% (n=10) of SRs failed to investigate heterogeneity in the process of synthesis analysis. Conclusion The heterogeneity is common in TCM related to SRs, and the most addressed is clinical heterogeneity. Addressing heterogeneity incorrectly would downgrade the quality of TCM related to SRs.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Chinese herb compared with an analgesic drug in the treatment of cancer pain. Methods We electronically searched CBM (1990 to 2008), CNKI (1990 to 2008), VIP (1990 to 2008), The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2008), and MEDLINE (1990 to 2008). Relevant journals and conference proceedings were also handsearched. The quality of the included trials was assessed according to the criteria recommended by the Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of interventions and meta-analyses were performed for homogeneous studies using the Cochrane collaboration’s review manager 4.2.2 software. Results Five randomized controlled trails (RCTs), all published in Chinese, involving 590 participants, were included. The quality of all RCTs was graded C (low). Meta-analyses were not performed due to heterogeneity. Instead, descriptive analyses were conducted. The results showed that as for the total effective rate in pain-relieving, Zhentongsan (RR=1.11, 95%CI 1.00 to 1.24, P=0.05) and Xiaozhengzhitong paste (RR=1.35, 95%CI 1.02 to 1.78, P=0.04) were more effective than Indometacin, with significant differences. There were no significant differences between Duyiwei capsule and Indometacin, and so were between Huajianbadumo as well as Shebingzhitong paste and Tramado. In terms of early potency, there were significant differences between Zhentongsan (SMD= –?9.87, 95%CI –10.84 to –8.89, Plt;0.000 01) as well as Xiaozhengzhitong paste (SMD= –8.74, 95%CI –10.164 to –7.32, Plt;0.000?01) and Indometacin, and so were between Shebingzhitong paste and Tramadol (SMD= –2.24, 95%CI –3.00 to –1.49, Plt;0.000?01). There were no significant differences between Huajianbadumo and Tramodo. With regard to the durative effect on pain-relieving, there were significant differences between Xiaozhengzhitong paste and Indometacin (WMD=4.78, 95%CI 2.99 to 6.57, Plt;0.00001), but not between Shebingzhitong paste and Tramadol. Conclusion Because of low quality of the existing studies, the current evidence is insufficient to define the efficacy and safety of compound Chinese herb, and further large-scale and high-quality RCTs are needed.
Objective To assess the quality of published systematic reviews and meta-analyses on Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) published in Chinese journals. Methods We searched CNKI, CMB from January 1995 to December 2006 and The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2006) for systematic reviews and meta-analyses on TCM. We extracted details of the interventions used in the treatment and control groups, analyzed the validity of included studies and investigated whether the reports used QUOROM statement or not. Results We identified 111 reports, of which 1 on prevention, 1 on adverse events, 1 on risk factors and premonitory symptoms, 2 on physiochemical parameters, and 106 on effectiveness and safety assessment. In total, 42 types of diseases were involved, and 41 reports were related to cerebrovascular diseases. As for the investigated interventions, 25 studies assessed TCM and 12 assessed acupuncture. Two had no control intervention design control in the group, 15 did not describe the interventions in the control group, 50 used active control (26 for western medicine, 12 for Chinese medicine, 12 for western plus Chinese medicine), 14 used blank control, 17 used baseline control, 4 used sham acupuncture or acupoint injection control etc., 5 used placebo control and 4 used "mutual control". The interventions used in the treatment and control groups varied widely. The number of trials included in the reviews and meta-analyses ranged from 1 to 35, and 24 studies included non-randomized controlled trials. Of the 111 reports, 14 were Cochrane reviews, 16 did not assess the quality of included randomized trials and a further 22 performed only simple and nonstandard quality assessment of the included trials. None of the reviews or meta-analyses used the QUOROM statement to report their results. Conclusions Because of the unique characteristics of TCM, systematic reviews of TCM should focus on a specific topic, avoid the selection of too many drugs, address the target indications of the test drugs and pay attention on intervention evaluation. High quality systematic reviews of TCM are needed but they will only be produced through the concerted efforts of clinicians, TCM practitioners and methodologists.