Objective To introduce the total mesorectal excision (TME)under the laparoscope and with the ultrosonic scalpel. Methods Under the laparoscope and with the ultrosonic scalpel, total mesorectal excision in 3 patients was performed. In operation, alone the parietal layer of pelvic fascia and inside the automatic nerve trunk, the mesorectum was excised with the ultrasonic scalpel. Results Three patients got final recovery, no damage to the viscera in operation occurred. Average hemorrhage amount was about 100ml. Intestinal function recovered within 24 hours, average in hospital time was 10.3 days. After 4 months, 3 patients got good living quality without recurrence and metastasis.Conclusion TME under the laparoscope is a new progress of less damageable operation. Compared with the traditional open laparotomy,it has some advantage. But it requires high technology and expensive equipments, and the case is still very limited in use.
Objective To investigate the clinical application of the right grstroepiploic artery (RGEA) in offpump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of the 38 patients who underwent RGEA grafts for OPCAB between December 2008 and July 2009 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. According to the difference of grafts, 76 patients undergoing OPCAB were divided into two groups. In the RGEA group, there were 38 patients including 36 males and 2 females with an age of 65.87±6.29 years. For the patients in this group, OPCAB was carried out with RGEA and other routine conduits as grafts. The control group had 38 patients including 35 males and 3 females with an age of 66.68±6.24 years. They underwent OPCAB with left internal mammary artery (LIMA), radial artery (RA), or saphenous vein (SV) as grafts. The intraoperative and postoperative clinical data for patients in both groups were analyzed and compared. Results All operations were carried out without serious complications like reoperation for bleeding, functional delayed gastric emptying, or severe infection, and no operative death occurred. Compared with the control group, operative time in the RGEA group was longer (295.53±45.16 min vs. 262.50±42.44 min,P=0.001), the number of anastomotic stomas [CM(159mm]was less (4.71±0.56 vs. 5.29±0.92, P=0.002), and less intraoperative plasma was consumed (194.74±186.30 ml vs. 565.79±382.70 ml, P=0.000). The 24 h drainage loss (394.71±205.36 ml vs. 536.32±258.85 ml, P=0.008), the blood cell consumption (1.67±1.48 U vs. 2.81±2.48 U, P=0.010) and the postoperative hospital stay (12.47±3.20 d vs. 15.47±9.31 d, P=0.035) were significantly lower in the RGEA group compared with those in the control group. Meanwhile, the time of postoperative mechanical ventilation time was longer in the RGEA group than that in the control group (1 398.82±1 349.94 min vs. 985.39±170.30 min, P=0.036). Seventytwo patients were followed up for a period from 9 to 17 months with 4 cases lost. No myocardial ischemia occurred in both groups of patients. Conclusion RGEA is an effective arterial conduit for OPCAB. It needs high technology and takes long operative time to apply RGEA in OPCAB.