ObjectiveTo investigate the application value of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) performed in patients with unplanned extubation (UE) in intensive care unit (ICU).MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis. The clinical data, application of NIV, reintubation rate and prognosis of UE patients in the ICU of this hospital from January 2014 to December 2018 were reviewed, and the patients were assigned to the control group or the NIV group according to the application of NIV after UE. The data between the two groups were compared and the application effects of NIV in UE patients were evaluated.ResultsA total of 66 UE patients were enrolled in this study, including 44 males and 22 females and with an average age of (64.2±16.1) years. Out of them, 41 patients (62.1%) used nasal catheter or mask for oxygenation as the control group, 25 patients (37.9%) used NIV as the NIV group. The Acute Physiology andChronic Health EvaluationⅡ score of the control group and the NIV group were (18.6±7.7) vs. (14.8±6.3), P=0.043. The causes of respiratory failure in the control group and the NIV group were as follows: pneumonia 16 patients (39.0%) vs. 7 patients (28.0%), postoperative respiratory failure 7 patients (17.1%) vs. 8 patients (32.0%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 8 patients (19.5%) vs. 6 patients (24.0%), others 5 patients (12.2%) vs. 4 patients (16.0%), heart failure 3 patients (7.3%) vs. 0 patients (0%), nervous system diseases 2 (4.9%) vs. 0 patients (0%), which showed no significant difference between the two groups. Mechanical ventilation time before UE were (12.5±19.8) vs (12.7±15.2) d (P=0.966), PaO2 of the control group and the NIV group before UE was (114.9±37.4) vs. (114.4±46.3)mm Hg (P=0.964), and oxygenation index was (267.1±82.0) vs. (257.4±80.0)mm Hg (P=0.614). Reintubation rate was 65.9% in the control group and 24.0% in the NIV group (P=0.001). The duration of mechanical ventilation was (23.9±26.0) vs. (21.8±26.0)d (P=0.754), the length of stay in ICU was (34.4±36.6) vs. (28.5±25.8)d (P=0.48). The total mortality rate in this study was 19.7%. The mortality rate in the control group and NIV group were 22.0% and 16.0% (P=0.555).ConclusionPatients with UE in ICU may consider using NIV to avoid reintubation.
ObjectiveTo retrospectively analyze the causes and risk factors of unplanned extubation (UE) in cancer patients during peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) retention, so as to provide references for effectively predicting the occurrence of UE. Methods27 998 cancer patients who underwent PICC insertion, maintenance and removal in the vascular access nursing center of our hospital from January 2016 to June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. General information, catheterization information, and maintenance information were collected. The Chi-squared test was used for univariate analysis, multivariate analysis was used by binary unconditional logistic regression. They were randomly divided into modeling group and internal validation group according to the ratio of 7∶3. The related nomogram prediction model and internal validation were established. ResultsThe incidence of UE during PICC retention in tumor patients was 2.80% (784/27 998 cases). Univariate analysis showed that age, gender, diagnosis, catheter retention time, catheter slipping, catheter related infection, catheter related thrombosis, secondary catheter misplacement, dermatitis, and catheter blockage had an impact on UE (P<0.05). Age, diagnosis, catheter retention time, catheter slipping, catheter related infection, catheter related thrombosis, secondary catheter misplacement, and catheter blockage are independent risk factors for UE (P<0.05). Based on the above 8 independent risk factors, a nomogram model was established to predict the risk of UE during PICC retention in tumor patients. The ROC area under the predicted nomogram was 0.90 (95%CI 0.89 to 0.92) in the modeling group, and the calibration curve showed good predictive consistency. Internal validation showed that the area under the ROC curve of the prediction model was 0.91 (95%CI 0.88 to 0.93), and the trend of the prediction curve was close to the standard curve. ConclusionPatients aged ≥60 years, non chest tumor patients, catheter retention time (≤6 months), catheter slipping, catheter related infections, catheter related thrombosis, secondary catheter misplacement, and catheter blockage increase the risk of UE. The nomogram model established in this study has good predictive ability and discrimination, which is beneficial for clinical screening of patients with different degrees of risk, in order to timely implement targeted prevention and effective treatment measures, and ultimately reduce the occurrence of UE.