ObjectiveTo investigate the efficiency of double moxibustion combined with intermittent catheterization on urination diary in patients with neurogenic bladder (NB) after spinal cord injury (SCI).MethodsFrom August 2014 to August 2016, hospitalized patients with NB after SCI were reviewed retrospectively and classified into the moxibustion group and the routine group. The urination diary related indicators, International Urinary Incontinence Advisory Committee Urinary Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICI-SQ-SF) score, and routine urine leucocyte count were collected.ResultsA total of 278 patients were enrolled in the study, in whom, the data of 96 were incomplete, and 26 got lost to follow-up. The routine group and the moxibustion group finally contained 70 and 86 respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups in sex, age, average course of the disease, SCI segment or grading of injury (P>0.05). After 2 months treatment, the urine routine leucocyte count decreased to (5.72± 0.36)/μL in the routine group and (3.22±0.27)/μL in the moxibustion group, and the ICI-Q-SF score decreased to 8.61±0.45 in the routine group and 5.07±0.38 in the moxibustion group. The urine routine leucocyte count and ICI-Q-SF score were lower than those before treatment, and were lower in the moxibustion group than those in the routine group (P<0.05). In the 7th to 8th week, in the routine group, the average single urine volume was (300±70) mL, the interval between two micturition was (3.5±0.6) hours, the frequency of urinary incontinence was (3.3±0.4) times per week, and the average residual urine volume was (125±42) mL; in the moxibustion group, they were (326±78) mL, (3.8±1.1) hours, (2.3±0.3) times per week, and (103±37) mL, respectively. The indexes were not statistically significant different from those in the 1st to 2nd week (P>0.05), except the average single urine volume in the routine group and all the indexes in the moxibustion group (P<0.05). They were all better in the moxibustion group than those in the routine group (P<0.05).ConclusionThe treatment of moxibustion and intermittent catheterization may improve bladder function, reduce residual urine, reduce urinary incontinence and improve the quality of life for patients with NB after SCI.
Objective To study the effect of preoperative urination training combined with restrictive fluid therapy with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) on postoperative urination in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. Methods A total of 150 patients who were conducted the unilateral TKA from March to May 2018 were divided into two groups, the trial group and the control group, with 75 patients in each group. The patients in the control group did not undergo urination training before surgery and were given liberal intravenous fluid therapy on the day of surgery; while the patients in the trial group received urination training before surgery and were given restrictive fluid therapy on the day of surgery. The pre-, intra-, and post-operative infusion volume and the total infusion volume on the day of surgery of the two groups were recorded; and the urination situation, urination time for the first time and the hospital days in the two groups were compared. Results The total infusion volume on the day of surgery in the trial group and the control group was (1 581.40±277.54) and (2 395.00±257.40) mL, respectively. After operation, in the trial group, there were 73 patients with smooth urinating, 2 with smooth urinating after inducing method, and none with urethral catheterization; in the control group, there were 66 patients with smooth urinating, 3 with smooth urinating after inducing method, and 6 with urethral catheterization. The urination time for the first time after operation in the trial group and the control group was (1.85±0.91) and (2.93±1.48) hours after back to the ward, respectively. These differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). The hospital stay in the trial group and the control group was (5.86±2.48) and (6.28±1.60) days, respectively, and the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusions Preoperative urination training combined with restrictive fluid therapy (the total infusion volume controls in about 1 500 mL on the day of surgery) in the TKA patients after ERAS is good for postoperation urination. It also can reduce the rate of postoperative urinary retention, and enhance rehabilitation.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of pelvic floor electrical stimulation on urinary dysfunction.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy of pelvic floor electrical stimulation on urinary dysfunction from inception to August 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies; then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 9 RCTs involving 559 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the pelvic floor electrical stimulation group was superior to the control group in bladder volume before and after treatment(MD=79.25, 95%CI 40.36 to 118.15, P<0.000 1), residual urine volume (MD=35.50, 95%CI 7.60 to 63.41, P=0.01), maximum detrusor pressure (MD=5.19, 95%CI 2.11 to 8.27, P<0.001), number of leaks (RR=1.95, 95%CI 1.39 to 2.52, P<0.000 01), daily average urination frequency (RR=2.64, 95%CI 1.97 to 3.31, P<0.000 01), and international lower urinary tract score (MD=5.07, 95%CI 2.17 to 7.96, P=0.000 6).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that pelvic floor electrical stimulation is an effective therapy for urinary dysfunction. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality-studies are required to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo investigate the status of urination in post-spineoperative (cervical thoracic and lumber verteb) patients under the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) mode.MethodsPatients who were admitted to the West China Hospital of Sichuan University from October 2018 to February 2019 were enrolled. The urination status of the patients was collected by using questionnaires. All patients were divided into normal urinating group, induced urinating group and catheterization group according to their urination status after returning to the ward.ResultsA total of 106 patients were included, including 78 (73.6%) who urinated smoothly [the first urinating time (72.18±36.33) min], 20 (18.9%) who urinated after induction [the first urinating time (81.50±41.68) min], and 8 (7.5%) who received catheters after induction failure [the first urinating time (162.50±84.52) min]. The different operation, operation time, position of urination, and postoperative pain degree affecting the placement of urethral catheter differed from each other significantly (P<0.05). Among the three groups, the differences were statistically significant in operation time, operation methods, position of urination (except for the induced urination group vs. catheterization group) and postoperative pain degree (except for the induced urination group vs. catheterization group) in pairs (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in other factors among three groups in pairs (P>0.05).ConclusionsMost post-spineoperative patients can autonomously urinate without catheter under the ERAS mode, which bases on operation methods, operation time, and the first urinating posture after the surgery. Early attention should be paid to patients with dysuresia to promote their early rehabilitation.
Objective To understand the urination of orthopedic patients after the catheter is removed, and to explore the influencing factors of urodynia. Methods Convenient sampling was used to select 160 patients who underwent surgical treatment in the Department of Orthopedics of West China Hospital of Sichuan University from May to July 2020. Questionnaires were used to investigate the patients’ urination, and a logistic regression model was used to analyze the factors affecting the patients’ urodynia. Results A total of 157 patients urinated by themselves after the catheter was removed, with 102 cases of dysuria. Logistic regression results showed that male [odds ratio (OR)=0.282, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.092, 0.863), P=0.027], Huaxi Emotional-Distress Index score [OR=1.407, 95%CI (1.124, 1.760), P=0.003] and intraoperative fluid infusion [OR=1.001, 95%CI (1.000, 1.002), P=0.014] were the influencing factors of urodynia. Conclusion Most orthopedic patients can urinate on their own after the catheter is removed, but more than half of the patients experience urodynia during the first urination. Gender, mental status and intraoperative fluid infusion are the influencing factors of urodynia after urinary catheter removal after surgery. Clinical nursing staff should identify these influencing factors as soon as possible and carry out targeted interventions to improve the success rate of patients with urination after removing the catheter, reduce the incidence of urodynia, and promote the recovery of patients.