ObjectivesTo systematically review the perinatal outcomes after laparoscopic myomectomy versus transabdominal myomectomy.MethodsPubMed, Web of Science, Elsevier, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data databases were searched from inception to July 2017, to collect randomized controlled trials or cohort studies comparing the perinatal outcomes after laparoscopic myomectomy and transabdominal myomectomy. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of include studies. Meta-analysis was then performed by RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsEight randomized controlled trials, twenty-one cohort studies involving 4357 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: the premature birth rate (OR=0.60, 95%CI 0.38 to 0.95, P=0.03) in the laparoscopic myomectomy was lower than that in the laparotomy group. However, the rate of uterine rupture during pregnancy (OR=3.19, 95%CI 1.29 to 7.89, P=0.01) in the laparoscopic myomectomy was higher than that in the laparotomy group. There were no significant differences between two groups in the myoma residual (OR=1.00, 95%CI 0.37 to 2.65, P=0.99), recurrence (OR=0.92, 95%CI 0.68 to 1.25, P=0.60), abortion (OR=0.90, 95%CI 0.63 to 1.28, P=0.56), ectopic pregnancy (OR=1.11, 95%CI 0.54 to 2.26, P=0.78), pregnancy rate (OR=1.06, 95%CI 0.89 to 1.27, P=0.52), cesarean (OR=0.82, 95%CI 0.57 to 1.19, P=0.31), and pregnancy complications (OR=0.84, 95%CI 0.45 to 1.59, P=0.60).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that there are no significant differences between two groups in the myoma residual, myoma recurrence, abortion, ectopic pregnancy, pregnancy rate, cesarean and pregnancy complications. While the rate of uterine rupture during pregnancy in the laparoscopic myomectomy is higher than that in the laparotomy group, the premature birth rate after operation in the laparoscopic myomectomy is lower and shorter than that in the laparotomy group. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify the above conclusion.
Objectives To analyze the risk factors of uterine rupture in pregnancy in Chengdu Women’s and Children’s Central Hospital in recent years. Methods The clinical data of pregnant uterine rupture patients who were hospitalized in Chengdu Women’s and Children’s Central Hospital from January 2011 to December 2017 were collected. The risk factors of uterine rupture in pregnancy were analyzed compared with the maternal delivery during the same period. The SPSS 23.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Results A total of 69 patients with uterine rupture were included, involving 14 cases of complete uterine rupture and 55 cases of incomplete uterine rupture. Compared with the pregnant females who were hospitalized during the same period, the incidence of uterine rupture in patients with scar uterus after cesarean section, history of laparoscopic hysterosalping surgery, placental implantation, twins and uterine malformation was higher, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Among them, the risk of uterine rupture was greater in the interpregnancy interval (IPI)>24 months after cesarean section in patients with scar uterus. There was no significant difference in the incidence of uterine rupture between the elderly and the multiple pregnant females and the maternal delivery during the same period (P>0.05). Conclusions Scar uterus (postoperative cesarean section), history of laparoscopic hysterosalping surgery, placental implantation, twins, and uterine malformation are possible risk factors for uterine rupture in pregnancy. Among them, patients with scar uterus have a greater risk of uterine rupture with IPI>24 months.