As one of the most sophisticated research methods of evidence-based medicine, systematic review is an activity of collecting, arranging and analyzing medical information. The methodological characteristics of systematic review reflect the value orientation of this activity. By analyzing and summarizing these characteristics, this paper points that the process of systematic review reflects the value orientation of attaching importance to obtaining universal information sources, treating individual information in an add-weight way, discretion in interpreting results and updating of time-limited information in medical information activities.
Objective To systematically review the requirements of patient participation in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in Chinese and foreign guideline development manuals. Methods Thirty-six authoritative society websites and guideline databases and 5 commonly used databases were searched online. Relevant information on patients’ participation in the guideline manuals was collected, summarized, and analyzed. Results A total of 37 manuals (33 foreign and 4 Chinese) were included. The requirements for the number of patients, the right to speak, status equality, and the right to vote in the guideline development manual accounted for 35.1%, 13.5%, 8.1%, and 5.4%, respectively. The requirements for participants’ mode of participation were not mentioned in the guideline development manuals from 2000 to 2010. There were 6 (16.2%) in 2011–2015 and 12 (32.4%) in 2016–2022. The comprehensive guidelines for multiple disease types accounted for 35.7%, 28.6%, and 57.1%, respectively, in terms of requirements for participants’ knowledge or experience, management of specialized personnel, and training support. The specific guidelines for a certain type of disease or drug accounted for 21.7%, 4.3%, and 17.4%, respectively; fifteen (40.5%) guideline development manuals mentioned the specific collection forms of patients’ values and preferences in guideline development. Conclusion Given changes to medical models and the emphasis on patients’ rights and interests, an increasing number of manuals have proposed requirements that consider the expression of patients’ values and preferences in manual development, and the dimensions of manual development are constantly enriched. However, manuals outlining the requirements of patient participation are still not comprehensive and can continue to improve.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the studies on the clinical comprehensive evaluation system of drugs at home and abroad. MethodsThe PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP and CBM databases were electronically searched to collect the literature and policy documents of the clinical comprehensive evaluation system of drugs from inception to October 31, 2022. The evaluation organization, evaluation perspective, application scope, domains and criteria were sorted out, and the evaluation of different types of drugs was analyzed in detail. ResultsA total of 101 clinical comprehensive evaluation systems of drugs were included. The publishing time was from 2009 to 2022, and the number of published articles increased. The first author mainly came from 26 countries, including China (n=34), Canada (n=11), the United States (n=10), and Spain (n=10). Forty-seven articles reported the evaluation perspective. All evaluation systems could be used for drug evaluation, of which 43 could be used as universal evaluation tools, and 58 could be used for the evaluation of specific drugs, mainly including anti-tumor drugs (n=15), orphan drugs (n=10) and traditional Chinese medicine (n=7). The number of evaluation domains varied from 2 to 22, and the number of criteria varied from 4 to 56. Among them, economics (n=73), effectiveness (n=72), safety (n=54), disease demand/burden (n=34), and innovation (n=24) were the most frequent evaluation domains. ConclusionThe research on clinical comprehensive evaluation of drugs at home and abroad has grown up. During the implementation of clinical comprehensive evaluation of Chinese patent medicine, it is necessary to clarify the evaluation perspective, define the evaluation scope, and determine the evaluation domains.
Value-based healthcare (VBHC) is an important guideline for current and future healthcare services. In practice, VBHC should be the best goal of public welfare of healthcare service. Meanwhile, VBHC and cost-effectiveness analysis together provide scientific evidence for healthcare decision-making. Pay by value is inevitable in the next stage of the reform of the payment system of medical insurance, and the health service system should be reconstructed based on VBHC. Finally, the challenges of VBHC implementation are discussed.
It's common that general rules exist in a certain classification. The general rules of expense classification enable us to judge the category of a patient as soon as possible and to curb the expense. Theory of rough set helps us reach the best reduction of attributes. Based on the core attributes, classification rules are put forward by value reduction. The results show that 10 core attributes remain in 21 attributes of 1527 inpatients' information and 76 classification rules are founded. All of 76 rules guide classification of the patients. 44 of the 76 rules define the only category of a patient, the other 32 rules defines the potential catagories of a patient. Meanwhile, equal attributes of the same category are summerized to guide the cost control of patients. The results indicate that the theory of rough set is effective in attributes reduction and rule generalization of patient expense classification, and it has important significance on medical practice.
ObjectiveTo analyze the multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) findings of normal appendices and appendices of acute appendicitis in old patients, and to explore the clinical value of MDCT in assessing acute appendicitis in old patients. MethodsSixty-six cases of acute appendicitis confirmed by surgery in 24 hours after MDCT scan from Jun. to Oct. 2016 (acute appendicitis group), and 40 cases underwent MDCT scan for non-abdominal pain causes without appendiceal lesions from Sep. to Oct. 2016 (normal appendices group), were included, and the MDCT images of both 2 groups were retrospectively analyzed. Observation items included:location, diameter, mural thickness, intra-luminal contents, and changes of surrounding structures. Results① Rate of appendices visualization. In total of 95.5% (63/66) appendices were visualized on MDCT in acute appendicitis group, while 95.0% (38/40) appendices were visualized on MDCT in normal appendices group (P > 0.05). ② Locations of appendices. Acute appendicitis group:appendices were found to be located at pelvic cavity in 22 cases, in front of ileum in 2 cases, behind ileum in 10 cases, below cecum in 25 cases, and behind cecum in 4 cases. Normal appendices group:appendices were found to be located at pelvic cavity in 15 cases, in front of ileum in 3 cases, behind ileum in 7 cases, below cecum in 5 cases, and behind cecum in 8 cases. There was significant difference between 2 groups in terms of location of appendices (P < 0.05). The appendices in acute appendicitis group located mainly at pelvic cavity and below cecum, while the appendices in normal appendices group located mainly at pelvic cavity. ③ The diameter and thickness of appendices. The appendiceal diameter and thickness in acute appendicitis group were (11.4±4.2) mm (6.2-21.9) mm and (4.3±2.2) mm (1.1-8.6) mm, respectively, while those in normal appendices group were (6.1±1.4) mm (3.7-8.6) mm and (1.7±0.8) mm (0.5-3.2) mm, respectively. The diameter and thickness of appendices in acute appendicitis group were significantly greater than those in normal appendices group, respectively (P < 0.05). ④ Contents of appendices. Acute appendices group:there was effusion with air in 14 cases in appendiceal cavity, full of effusion in 36 cases, and appendicolith combined with effusion in 13 cases. Normal appendices group:there was full of air in 15 cases in appendiceal cavity, air with a little faeces of higher density in 13 cases, and nothing in 10 cases. Effusion was more common in appendiceal cavity in acute appendicitis group, while air was more common in normal appendices group. ⑤ Around appendices. Fat stranding was seen in 57 cases, adjacent parietal peritoneum thickening was seen in 56 cases, focal effusion was seen in 18 cases, abscess was seen in 2 cases, free air in peritoneal cavity was seen in 8 cases, and lymphadenopathy was seen in 35 cases. None of these imaging features were seen in normal appendices group. ConclusionsMDCT can demonstrate features of normal appendices and acute appendicitis in old patients. MDCT yield high diagnostic accuracy in acute appendicitis in old patients, and can provide useful information before surgery.
ObjectivesTo initially construct a scientific, reasonable and precision medicine technology value judgment framework suitable for China’s national conditions based on expert consultation method, so as to provide scientific value judgment system support for China's medical insurance decision-making.MethodsThe preliminary evaluation indicator system for precision medicine technology value was established by using literature analysis and expert consultation method, and the direct weighting method was used to determine the indicators weight.ResultsAfter two rounds of expert consultation, an indicator system suitable for the value judgment of precision medicine technology in China was constructed, including 5 primary indicators (health needs, health effects, economics, innovation and suitability) and 14 secondary indicators. Each indicator was weighted according to importance.ConclusionsA set of precision medicine value judgment indicator system suitable for China has been initially established, which lays a certain foundation for further measurement research of the indicator system and provides a scientific basis for medical insurance decision-making.
Objective To systematically review the effect of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) on postoperative clinical outcomes among esophageal cancer patients. Methods The PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were searched from inception to January 16th, 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies on the clinical application of IMT among postoperative esophageal cancer patients. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.4 software. Results Eight studies were included, including 7 RCTs and 1 cohort study, involving 728 participants. The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated that IMT significantly enhanced postoperative respiratory muscle function [maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP): MD=5.75, 95%CI 0.81 to 10.70, P=0.02; maximum expiratory pressure (MEP): MD=8.19, 95%CI 4.14 to 12.24, P<0.001] and pulmonary function (FEV1%: MD=6.94, 95%CI 5.43 to 8.45, P<0.001; FVC%: MD=4.65, 95%CI 2.70 to 6.60, P<0.001; MVV: MD=8.66, 95%CI 7.17 50 10.14, P<0.001; FEV1/FVC%: MD=8.04, 95%CI 4.68 to 11.40, P<0.001). Additionally, the results indicated that IMT could substantially improve postoperative functional performance [six-minute walk test (6MWT): MD=66.99, 95%CI 10.13 to 123.85, P=0.02; Borg index: MD=−1.03, 95%CI −1.26 to −0.81, P<0.001]. However, no significant reduction in the incidence of postoperative complications was observed. Conclusion IMT can improve the postoperative clinical outcomes of esophageal cancer patients and facilitate patient recovery after surgery, which has high clinical value. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Methodological quality and transferability will be important issues for the credibility and usefulness of both published studies and administrative methods for evaluating the socio-economic value of marketed medicines in China. This paper critically examines factors commonly contributing to, or inhibiting, the quality and transferability of socio-economic evidence of the value of medicines, with specific reference to the Chinese community. It discusses appropriate approaches to design, performance, and reporting of published economic evaluation studies, as well as guides on assessment of quality of economic evaluations and recommends two internationally established methods that may be suitable for training in this setting.
Objective To evaluate the value of magnetic resonanace imaging (MRI) on the diagnosis of complex anal fistula. Methods The preoperative digital examination and MRI with the phased-array coil were implemented for 22 patients who were clinically suspected with complex anal fistula. The final diagnosis were based on surgical findings. Outcomes of MRI and digital examination were compared with surgical results. Results Eighteen patients were diagnosed as complex anal fistula, 1 case of presacral cyst and 3 cases of chronic anorectal fistula combined with perianal mucinous adenocarcinoma. All the patients were correctly diagnosed by MRI, while the patients with presacral cyst and perinaal mucinous adenocarcinoma could not be diagnosed correctly by digital examination. According to the Parks classification, 3 patients suffered from transsphincteric fistula, 11 cases of supra-sphincteric and 5 cases of extra-sphincteric fistula. The diagnosis rates of the internal opening with digital examination and MRI were 33.3% and 72.2%, the rates of the primary tract were 83.3% and 100%, and the rates of the secondary extensions were 16.7% and 88.9%, respectively. The differences in detection of internal opening and secondary extensions between MRI and digital examination were significant (P=0.019, P=0.000), the difference in detection of primary tract was no significant (P=0.072). Conclusion MRI with the phased-array coil can develope the high accuracy in the diagnosis of complex anal fistulas, and reveal the relationship between anorectal sphincters and the complex fistula.