ObjectiveTo compare the therapeutic effect of dual-chamber pacing (DDD) and ventricular single-chamber pacing (VVI) on arrhythmia via systematic evaluation. MethodsWith the method of Cochrane system evaluation, we searched Medline, Embase, CNKI, PubMed and Wanfang database (the searching time was up to June 30, 2016) for randomized controlled trials comparing DDD with VVI treatingcardiac arrhythmias. Meta analysis was performed using RevMan5.3 software. ResultsWe collected 12 randomized controlled trials of DDD and VVI pacing treating cardiac arrhythmia including 1 704 patients, but the quality of the studies were not good. The results of Meta analysis showed that:compared with VVI pacing mode, DDD pacing mode reduced the risk of atrial fibrillation[RR=0.36, 95%CI (0.22, 0.59), P < 0.000 1]; besides, it reduced the left atrial diameter[SMD=-0.43, 95%CI (-0.68, -0.17), P=0.001], the left ventricular end diastolic dimension[SMD=-0.33, 95%CI (-0.61, -0.05), P=0.02] and increased the left ventricular ejection fraction[SMD=1.03, 95%CI (0.49, 1.57), P=0.000 2]. ConclusionsComparing DDD with VVI on the treatment of cardiac arrhythmia in patients with cardiac arrhythmia, DDD pacing can reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation and thrombosis, enhance heart function and improve blood supply. But because of the low quality of the included studies, the curative effect cannot be confirmed, and more randomized controlled trials with high quality needs to be carried out in the future.