ObjectiveTo investigate the classification and treatment strategies of symptomatic severe osteoporotic vertebral fracture and collapse. MethodsBetween August 2010 and January 2014, 42 patients with symptomatic severe osteoporotic vertebral fracture and collapse were treated, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. According to clinical symptom and imaging materials, 23 cases were classified as type I (local pain, limitation of motion, no neurological symptom, and no obvious deformity), 12 cases as type II (slight neurological symptom and kyphotic Cobb angle ≤ 30°), and 7 cases as type III (severe neurological symptom and kyphotic Cobb angle <30°). In 23 type I patients, 17 underwent percutaneous vertebral augmentation, 6 underwent posterior pedicle screw fixation strengthened with bone cement combined with percutaneous vertebral augmentation. In 12 type II patients, they were treated with local spinal decompression and internal fixation strengthened with bone cement. In 7 type III patients, 5 underwent posterior osteotomy, and 2 underwent one stage posterior approach of vertebral resection and reconstruction. The visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and local kyphotic Cobb angle were used to evaluate the neurological function. The complications were recorded. ResultsThe operation was successfully completed in all patients. Wound infection and ketoacidosis secondary to stress blood glucose rise occurred in 1 case of type III patients respectively, and were cured after corresponding treatment; primary healing of wound was obtained in the other patients. The patients were followed up from 6 to 36 months (mean, 11.6 months). The nerve function was improved in 17 cases, and micturition disability was observed in 2 cases. Asymptomatic cement leakage occurred in 13 cases (30.95%) (7 cases in type I, 4 cases in type II, and 2 cases in type III). No bone cement dislocation and internal fixation failure were found during follow-up. The VAS score, ODI, and the local kyphotic Cobb angle at 1 week and last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with preoperative ones (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between at 1 week and last follow-up (P>0.05). ConclusionIn order to improve the effectiveness and reduce the risk and complications of operation, individualized strategies should be performed according to different types of severe osteoporotic vertebral fracture and collapse.
ObjectiveTo analyze the effect of core stabilization exercise with unstable support surface on rehabilitation of patients with osteoporotic vertebral fracture.MethodsFrom January 2018 to January 2020, 66 patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures in the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University were selected as the research objects. All patients were treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty. After operation, they were randomly divided into intervention group and control group by random number table method, with 33 cases in each group. Both groups were given routine rehabilitation intervention after operation, while the intervention group was given core stabilization exercise with unstable support surface at the same time. The vertebral height, shape, stability and gait of the two groups were compared 1 day before operation and 1 day after rehabilitation training.ResultsThere was no significant difference in gender, age, injured vertebral body, course of osteoporosis, years of education and marital status between the two groups (P>0.05). Before surgery, there was no statistically significant difference in the height ratio of the front edge of the injured vertebra, middle height ratio of the injured vertebra, back convex Cobb angle, track length when eyes were open, track length when eyes were closed, Romberg rate, track length per unit time when eyes were open, track length per unit time when eyes were closed, Romberg rate per unit time, deviation of the center of gravity on X-axis when eyes were open, deviation of the center of gravity on X-axis when eyes were closed, deviation of the center of gravity on Y-axis when eyes were open, deviation of the center of gravity on Y-axis when eyes were closed, stride length, step frequency or comfortable pace between the two groups (P>0.05). After training, the height ratio of the front edge of the injured vertebra [(79.26±12.15)% vs. (72.26±13.36)%], middle height ratio of the injured vertebra [(82.11±10.26)% vs. (75.64±9.56)%], back convex Cobb angle [(9.87±7.10) vs. (14.41±2.36)°], track length when eyes were closed [(1856.29±457.16) vs. (2358.48±786.45) mm], Romberg rate [(1.32±0.29)% vs. (1.87±0.54)%], track length per unit time when eyes were closed [(33.45±3.26) vs. (41.55±4.69) mm], Romberg rate per unit time [(1.41±0.30)% vs. (1.95±0.77)%], deviation of the center of gravity on X-axis when eyes were open [(11.06±1.36) vs. (16.54±2.22) mm], deviation of the center of gravity on X-axis when eyes were closed [(11.15±0.96) vs. (23.31±3.06) mm], deviation of the center of gravity on Y-axis when eyes were open [(12.57±1.84) vs. (15.56±2.06) mm], deviation of the center of gravity on Y-axis when eyes were closed [(15.69±2.05) vs. (18.96±3.56) mm], stride length [(0.57±0.12) vs. (0.49±0.10) m], step frequency [(1.09±0.29) vs. (0.94±0.20) step/s] and comfortable pace [(0.35±0.12) vs. (0.29±0.10) m/s] of the intervention group were better than those of the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the track length when eyes were open or track length per unit time when eyes were open between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionIn patients with osteoporotic vertebral body fractures, core stabilization exercise with unstable support surface on the basis of conventional rehabilitation interventions after surgery can effectively restore the height and shape of the vertebral body, and improve the stability and gait to a certain extent.