ObjectiveTo compare the outcomes after self-gripping mesh repair to ordinary polypropylene mesh secured with sutures in women’s Lichtenstein hernioplasty.MethodsThe clinical data of 116 female patients with primary unilateral inguinal hernia who were admitted to The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2014 to January 2017 were prospectively analyzed. A randomized controlled trial was performed based on a random number table. All patients were allocated into self-gripping mesh group (PG group) and ordinary polypropylene mesh group (PL group). The outcomes included operative time, post-operative pain score, analgesic used, hospital stay, urinary retention, wound infection, and seroma were recorded. Patients were followed-up after 1 week, 1 months, 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years after operation. Follow-up data included chronic pain, foreign body feeling, affect daily activities, and recurrence.ResultsNinety-nine participants completed follow-up. There were 48 patients in the PG group and 51 participants in the PL group. The operative time of the PG group was significantly shorter than that of the PL group (P=0.045), but there was no significant difference in analgesic used, hospital stay, incidence of urinary retention and wound infection, visual analogue scale (VAS) of wound pain at rest at 1 week postoperatively, VAS of wound pain on coughing at 1 week postoperatively between the two groups (P>0.05). At 1 month after operation, the incidence of foreign body feeling in the PG group was significantly higher than that of the PL group (P=0.031), while there was no significant difference in ratio of VAS≥3 and incidence of affect daily activities (P>0.05). At 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years after operation, there was no significant difference in incidences of foreign body feeling, chronic pain, and affect daily activities between the two groups (P>0.05). There was one recurrence in the PL group and none in the PG group, without a significant difference (P=0.248).ConclusionThe surgical outcomes of self-gripping mesh are comparable to the ordinary polypropylene mesh with a reduced operation time in women’s Lichtenstein hernioplasty.
ObjectiveTo compare the outcomes after mini-mesh approach to modified Kugel technique in femoral hernia repair.MethodsThe clinical data of 99 patients with primary unilateral femoral hernia who were admitted to The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from July 2012 to December 2016 were prospectively analyzed. A randomized controlled study was performed based on a random number table. All patients were allocated into mini-mesh group and Kugel group. The outcomes including operative time, wound pain scores (1 week after operation), analgesic used, hospital stay after operation, urinary retention, wound infection, seroma, and femoral vein thrombosis were recorded. Patients were followed-up at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years after operation. Follow-up data included chronic pain, foreign body feeling, quality of life, and recurrence.ResultsNinety-seven patients completed follow-up. There were 48 patients in the Kugel group and 49 patients in the mini-mesh group. The operation time of the mini-mesh group was significantly shorter than that of the Kugel group (P=0.030). There was no significant difference in analgesic used, hospital stay after operation, urinary retention, visual analog scale of wound pain at rest (VAS) 1 week postoperatively, and VAS of wound pain on coughing 1 week postoperatively between the two groups (P>0.05). No patient had wound infection, seroma or femoral vein thrombosis in the two groups. At 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years follow-up, there was no significant difference in chronic pain, foreign body feeling, and SF-36 score between the two groups (P>0.05). Ninety-seven patients completed 2 years follow-up, with no recurrence occurred during follow-up period.ConclusionsThe operative outcomes of mini-mesh repair are comparable to modified Kugel repair with a reduced operation time in femoral hernia patients. It is a safe and promising technique.
ObjectiveTo study the clinical efficacy of three mesh positions for treatment of ventral hernia.MethodsThe data of 87 patients undergoing abdominal incision hernia repair from January 2015 to January 2017 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University were analyzed respectively. They were divided into three groups according to the different mesh position, Onlay treatment (n=28), Inlay treatment (n=27) and Sublay treatment (n=32). The curative effect and complications of three different surgical methods were compared and analyzed.ResultsAll the patients were recovered and discharged. A total of 6 cases among 87 patients had incision fat liquefaction, 1 patient had superficial infection and 2 patients had postoperative incision hematoma. After 3 to 36 months of follow-up (average 8 months), 3 cases of 87 patients recurred.ConclusionsThree kinds of surgeries for ventral hernia are feasibility and value, Sublay treatment is not only less pain and complications but more effective. We should strengthen the screening of preoperative cases and selecting appropriate surgical methods to prevent and reduce the recurrence of hernia.