With the rapid development of evidence-based medicine during the past two decades, evidence andevidence-based methods were not only used in the field of health care, but also applied to other non-medical fields. Asystematic literature search and a comparative study were conducted to investigate the definition of evidence. We also putforward our own definition of evidence: Evidence is the information from the systematic review process. We also discussedthe development of evidence-based paradigm and hope this will act as a reference for other subjects and industries.
Objective To systematically review the value of ultrasound in the diagnosis of fracture of the distal radius and ulna for providing evidence for clinical diagnosis. MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 7, 2016), CNKI, CBM and WanFang Data databases for studies about ultrasound in the diagnosis of fracture of the distal radius and ulna from inception to August 1st, 2016. Two reviewers independently screened literatures according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies by using the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2) tool, and then meta-analysis was performed by using Meta-Disc 1.4 software. ResultsA total of 16 articles involving 1 182 patients and 631 fractures were included. The results of heterogeneity test revealed that there was statistical heterogeneity among the results of studies, thus, random effects model was used for meta-analysis. The results of meta-analysis showed that the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnosis odds ratio for ultrasound diagnosis fracture of the distal radius and ulna were 0.95 (95%CI 0.94 to 0.97), 0.92 (95%CI 0.89 to 0.94), 9.98 (95%CI 5.20 to 19.15), 0.07 (95%CI 0.04 to 0.13), 187.94 (95%CI 65.67 to 537.84), respectively. The area under the SROC curve was 0.976 4. ConclusionUltrasound is a useful non-invasive method as a routine examination for fracture of the distal radius and ulna. Due to the limited quality and quantity of included studies, the above conclusion is needed to be validated by more high-quality studies.
Objective To investigate the reading habits of authors of articles published in the Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine (CJEBM) and to compare the findings with those from other surveys. Methods A total of 512 questionnaires were sent to authors who had contributed to CJEBM over the past 7 years. Results A total of 129 questionnaires were returned (response rate 31.6%). The replies showed that the main purpose of reading literature was to keep up with the latest developments in medicine (94% of replies). The main reading material was medical journals (86%). Most respondents (57%) spent more than 3 hours a week reading journals. The biggest problem identified by authors was the lack of full text papers, but the first choice was the electronic versions of the literature. More than half of the authors (57%) said that they spent less time reading than in the past. Conclusion Effective reading of the medical literature is a basic requirement in the practice of evidence-based medicine. It is necessary and important for clinicians and healthcare providers to improve their reading skills and methods.
This study was an interpretation study based on the standard of AGREEⅡ. It analyzed methodological perspective of the International Evidence-Based Recommendations for Focused Cardiac Ultrasound determined by the International Conference on Focused Cardiac UltraSound (IC-FoCUS).
This is the second paper in the evidence-based medicine glossary series. It provides information on the principles for evidence-based medicine through definitions, criteria for inclusion and screening, regular flow-sheet, reporting format and the establishment of databases.
This is the fifth paper in the evidence-based medicine glossary series. In this paper, we mainly introduce the systematic error（bias）and random error in medical research, review the definition and classification of bias made by different institutions and individuals. We also identify and categorize more than 10 types of bias in systematic review, which are considered the best evidence in evidence-based medicine. Additionally, we introduce some methods to reduce and eliminate bias, explaine six subject headings related to bias in MeSH, and introduce a new glossary — uncertainty in metrology.
Using the AGREE Ⅱ standard, this paper interpretated from methodological perspective of the Korean Guidelines for Appropriate use of cardiac CT which was made by Korean Society of Radiology and the Korean Society of Cardiology.
This is the third paper in the evidence-based medicine glossary series. We count terms and phrases having the words"evidence-based" in the title using bibliometrics. We then analyze the frequency of emergence, publication period, languages, and journal of the glossaries published. Finally, we focus on the link between the title and the glossary, and explore the development of trends in EBM.
This is the sixth paper in the evidence-based medicine glossary series. In this paper, We mainly introduced the concept of research synthesis, systematic review and meta-analysis and review developing process of these glossary.