ObjectiveTo compare efficacy of laparoscopic or open hepatectomy in benign liver tumors patients with different difficult operations. MethodsAccording to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the patients with benign liver tumors who underwent hepatectomy in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from September 2014 to March 2021 were collected. The enrolled patients were assigned into low, medium, and high difficulties by the Hasegawa liver resection surgical difficulty score model, then the patients were matched by propensity score matching. The liver function and inflammatory indexes, intraoperative bleeding, operative time, total hospital stay, postoperative complications, and hospitalization expenses of patients with benign liver tumors after laparoscopic (laparoscope group) or open (open group) hepatectomy were compared. ResultsA total of 209 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in this study. According to the Hasegawa criteria, there were 59, 89, and 61 patients with low, medium, and high difficulties respectively. After 1∶1 propensity score matching, 18, 34, and 14 patients in the laparoscope group and open group were matched respectively. There were no statistic differences in the baseline data between the laparoscope group and open group (P>0.05). ① For the patients with low and medium difficulties, compared with the open group, the different values of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, white blood cell count, and neutrophil percentage were lower (P<0.05), the intraoperative bleeding and total hospital stay were less or shorter (P<0.05), and the albumin were higher (P<0.05) in the laparoscope group. There were no statistic differences in these indexes among the patients with high difficulty (P>0.05). ② Compared with the open group, the operative time of the laparoscope group was shorter in the patients with low difficulty (P<0.05) and longer in the patients with high difficulty (P<0.05), and there was no statistic difference in patients with medium difficulty (P>0.05). ③ The postoperative complications had no statistic differences between the two groups for the patients with low and high difficulties (P>0.05), while which in the laparoscope group were lower than in the open group for the patients with medium difficulty (P<0.05). ④ The hospitalization expenses of the laparoscope group was higher than the open group for the patients with high difficulty (P<0.05), while which had no statistic differences between the two groups for the patients with low and medium difficulties (P>0.05). ⑤ The total hospital stay of the laparoscope group was shorter than the open group (P<0.05) no matter which difficult operation.ConclusionsAccording to results of this study, laparoscopic hepatectomy has more obvious advantages as compared with open hepatectomy for patients with low or medium difficulty, which could greatly shorten hospital stay and accelerate rehabilitation of patients. Even for patients with high difficulty, laparoscopic hepatectomy still shows an advantage of shortening hospital stay.
ObjectiveTo Summarize the clinical features of retroperitoneal ganglioneuroma.MethodsA total of 18 cases of pathologically confirmed retroperitoneal ganglioneuroma, who received surgery in The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from May 2013 to July 2016, were collected to reviewe the clinical features, imaging findings, pathologic characteristics, treatments, and prognosis of retroperitoneal ganglioneuroma.Results① Clinical symptoms. Of the 18 cases, 8 cases were found by physical examination, and had no symptoms; 6 cases showed abdominal pain and discomfort; 3 cases had hypertension; 1 case had bulge and discomfort in the lower abdomen. ② Imaging performance. All of the 18 cases underwent color Doppler ultrasonography, 16 cases showed clear hypoechoic mass, and hypoechoic masses showed irregular shape in 2 cases; homogeneous echo in 12 cases and inhomogeneous echo in 6 cases could be seen. Seventeen cases underwent CT scan, and homogeneous low density in 14 cases, uneven density in 3 cases, scattered calcification in 3 cases could be seen. Fifteen cases underwent CT dynamic contrast-enhanced scan, 2 cases showed no significant enhancement both in dynamic and venous phase, 8 cases showed no significant enhancement in arterial phase, 11 cases showed heterogeneous enhancement in venous phase. Three cases underwent MRI scan, T1WI images of 3 cases showed uniform low signal; T2WI images showed high signal in 1 case, T2WI images showed high signal with moderate intensity in 2 cases. ③ Surgery and prognosis. Fifteen cases underwent laparoscopic retroperitoneal tumor resection,3 cases underwent open surgery, and all the tumors were completely resected. All cases had good postoperative recovery and no significant complication occurred. All cases were followed up for 6 to 32 months with a median of 20 months, no recurrence or distant metastasis was found during follow-up period.ConclusionsRetroperitoneal ganglioneuroma has nonspecific clinical manifestation. Imaging examinations are the most effective adjuvant ways preoperatively, but patholoy is still the gold standard of final diagnosis for ganglioneuroma. Radical tumor resection is the most effective therapy with satisfactory prognosis for ganglioneuroma.
Objective To explore the influencing factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), and to compare the incidence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy with internal drainage of main pancreatic duct and external drainage according to the pancreatic fistula risk score (FRS) system, to provide the basis for the best drainage scheme in clinic. Methods The clinical data of 76 patients with PD who treated in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from January 2016 to December 2017 were analyzed retrospectively, to explore the risk factors of pancreatic fistula. Single factor analysis was based on group chi-square test or Fisher exact probability method, and multivariate analysis was based on unconditioned logistic regression model. According to the results of FRS, the difference of pancreatic fistula in different risk groups was explored. The statistical method was chi-square test. Results The incidence of pancreatic fistula after PD was 31. 5% in 76 patients.Univariate analysis showed that the diameter of the main pancreatic duct and the texture of the pancreas were the related factors affecting the occurrence of pancreatic fistula after PD (P<0.05), and the soft pancreas was the independent risk factor for the occurrence of pancreatic fistula after PD (OR=3.886, P=0.011). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula between the internal drainage group and the external drainage group (P>0.05). There was no pancreatic fistula occurred in the patients with negligible risk. The incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients with high risk of external drainage group was only 12.5%, comparing with patients in internal drainage group (63.6%), the difference was statistically significant (P=0.026). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula between patients in the external drainage group with moderate risk and low risk compared with the corresponding patients in the internal drainage group (P>0.05). Conclusions Pancreatic texture was an independent risk factor for pancreatic fistula after PD. External drainage maybe more effective than internal drainage in preventing pancreatic fistula after PD in patients with high risk of FRS.