ObjectiveTo summarize the progress of perioperative pain management in patients with lower limb vascular diseases. MethodRetrieved the literature about pain management in patients with lower limb vascular diseases both at home and abroad in recent years and reviewed the literature. ResultsLower limb vascular diseases were very common in elderly patients. Whether it was limb ischemic pain or surgery-related pain, it often increased the stress response and activation of the autonomic system, which was not conducive to the recovery of the disease. Good analgesic management was important for these patients. Perioperative pain management could be performed by intravenous analgesics, oral analgesics, local anesthesia, neuraxial anesthesia and peripheral nerve block. Acute and chronic pain should be actively managed during perioperative period. Pre-emptive analgesic strategies could be implemented in patients with severe peripheral vascular disease. ConclusionsGood perioperative analgesia management is necessary. Pain management which employes one or more analgesic methods is important in maximizing pain relief, function, and quality of life for this patient group.
ObjectiveTo investigate the hand hygiene status of nursing staff in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) isolation ward, find out the difficulties and problems in hand hygiene implementation, and then put forward scientific and feasible suggestions to improve the compliance of hand hygiene.MethodsSelf-designed Questionnaire on Hand Hygiene Status of Nursing Staff in COVID-19 Isolation Ward was distributed through the Wenjuanxing, a platform to collect data. The questionnaire, which included general information, knowledge related to hand hygiene, and the status of hand hygiene in isolation ward, was distributed to the nurses working in isolation wards in Wuhan, Hubei Province from March 15th, 2020 to March 22nd, 2020.ResultsValid questionnaires were collected from 492 nurses. The difficulty in performing hand hygiene in the isolation ward was ranked ≥level 3 by 248 nurses (50.41%), the degree of which was divided into 10 levels (level 1 was no difficulty, level 10 was the most difficult). A total of 369 participants (75.00%) thought that wearing gloves for hand disinfection would damage the gloves. There were 161 participants who thought that gloves should be changed every 2 hours, accounting for the largest proportion (32.72%); while 226 participants actually changed gloves every 4 hours, accounting for the largest proportion (45.93%).ConclusionsThe difficulty of performing hand hygiene in isolation ward should be paid attention to. It is recommended to carry out further research on the replacement time of gloves.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the application of dexmedetomidine for moderate sedation in patients undergoing endoscopic ultrasonography.MethodsPatients who were planned to undergo endoscopic ultrasonography in West China Hospital of Sichuan University from February to June 2019 were randomly divided into dexmedetomidine group (trial group) and propofol group (control group). The basic conditions, success rate of endoscopic ultrasound diagnosis and treatment, sedation-related adverse events, implementation of airway management, postoperative comfort evaluation and endoscopic physician satisfaction score of the two groups were compared.ResultsA total of 120 patients were eventually enrolled, 60 in each group. There was no significant difference in the basic conditions of the two groups (P>0.05). The success rate of endoscopic ultrasound diagnosis and treatment in two groups were 100%. There was no significant difference in the incidence of bucking, apnea and bradycardia between the two groups (P>0.05). The incidence of hypotension (15.0% vs. 31.7%), hypoxemia (6.7% vs.20.0%) in the trial group was lower than those in the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The proportion of patients in the trial group who performed airway management was lower than that in the control group (1.7% vs. 28.3%), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative pain score, the first time to get out of bed and postoperative 15-item quality of recovery questionnaire score between the two groups (P>0.05). The incidence of nausea and vomiting at 6 hours after operation (48.3% vs. 3.3%) and 24 hours after operation (10.0% vs. 0.0%) and the time required for recovery of gastrointestinal function ［(201.4±178.4) vs. (148.5±75.7) min］ in the trial group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The median (the lower and upper quartile) of comfort score of patients and satisfaction score of endoscopic physicians were 8 (6, 10) and 8 (7, 9) in the trial group, respectively, and were 10 (9, 10) and 9 (8, 10) in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05).ConclusionModerate sedation with dexmedetomidine could provide good sedative and analgesic effects in endoscopic ultrasonography. It has little effect on respiration and blood pressure, but the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting were higher than deep sedation with propofol. And patient comfort and endoscopic physician satisfaction also need to be improved.