ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical and cosmetic outcome of patients with early breast cancer underwent oncoplastic techniques in breast conserving surgery. MethodsClinical data of 59 patients with early stage breast cancer who underwent oncoplastic techniques in the breast conserving surgery were analyzed retrospectively from January 2007 to March 2011. Cosmetic outcome score and patient satisfaction questionnaire were also assessed. ResultsThe age of the patients was (53.5±9.8) years (range, 32 to 77 years). The diameter of tumors was (1.6±0.7) cm (range, 0.5 to 4.0 cm). The foci located at upper quadrant in 38, lower quadrant in 17, central area in 4. During operation, single incision approach was used in 25 patients, two incisions approach in 34 patients. A variety of methods were used to repair breast defects including mammary gland direct suture in 9 patients, mammary gland pedicle flaps in 35, local flaps or adipofascial flap in 9, latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps in 2, and reduction mammaplasty with “J” or double ring incision in 4. The mean followup period was 30 months (range, 3 to 53 months), no local recurrence was detected. However, bone metastases was found in one patient on 14 months after operation. Fifty-three patients (89.8%) had good to excellent aesthetic results with cosmetic outcome score ≥26. Patient satisfaction questionnaire showed that 40 patients (67.8%) were excellent, 14 (23.7%) good, 3 (5.1%) fair, and 2 (3.4%) poor. ConclusionOncoplastic techniques in the breast conservative therapy for early stage breast cancer is a safe and effective procedure, with highly satisfactory cosmetic outcomes in the majority of patients.
ObjectiveTo discuss the indications of the nonoperative management for perforated peptic ulcer. MethodsClinical data of 145 patients with perforated peptic ulcer, aged below 70 years old, with first attack and onset timelt;12 h , admitted to our hospital between January 2002 and December 2009, were analyzed respectively. Patients who were negative for fluid of abdominopelvic cavity in ultrasound examination and leakage in watersoluble contrast examination received nonoperative management, otherwise underwent operation directly (If the patients were being on medication for the ulcer, they should also go directly to surgery). Non-operative patients were converted to operation if the symptom had not relieved during the first 12 h. When admitted , the APACHE Ⅱ score was calculated for all patients. ResultsSeventy-four and 71 patients underwent non-operative management and operation directly respectively. Sex, age, onset time, perforation site and so on were comparable between the two groups （Pgt;0.05）, while APACHE Ⅱ score over 8 was 25.7% and 76.1% respectively with significant difference (P=0000). In nonoperative group, 11 (149%) patients were converted to operation. The mortality (4.1% vs 9.8%, P=0.203), mobility (16.2% vs 25.3%, P=0.175), hospital stay 〔(11.4±2.5) d vs (11.3±1.3) d, P=0.447〕, and cost 〔(11 657.3±2 826.4) yuan vs (10 013.0±1 877.4) yuan, P=0.212〕 between two groups had also no significant difference. The mean APACHE Ⅱ score was significant different between the survivors and the dead (9.3 vs 20.2, P=0.000). APACHE Ⅱ score was positively related to mortality and morbility （r=0.98, P=0.000； r=0.52, P=0.000）. ConclusionsNon-operative management is a safe and effective way in selected patients with perforated peptic ulcer, such as APACHE Ⅱ score ≤8, negative for fluid of abdominopelvic cavity in ultrasound examination, and leakage in water-soluble contrast examination. APACHE Ⅱ score is an important factor in prognosis of these patients.