ObjectiveTo investigate the necessity and value of subcutaneous suction drainage in the prevention of fat liquefaction of postoperative abdominal vertical incision for obese patients. MethodsThree hundred and fortytwo obese patients underwent abdominal vertical incision from February 2008 to October 2010 were randomly divided into indwelling tube group and noindwelling tube group in our department of general surgery and obstetrics and gynecology. Agrade healing rate, the incidences of fat liquefaction and incision complications, mean healing time of incision, patient satisfaction, foreign body sensation, and direct medical costs were evaluated. ResultsThree hundred and twentyeight cases were included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 165 patients in the indwelling tube group and 163 patients in the noindwelling tube group. There were not significant differences of age, gender, fat thickness, surgical time, incision length, and BMI between two groups (Pgt;0.05). The incidence of foreign body sensation of the no-indwelling tube group was less than that of the indwelling tube group 〔3.7% (6/163) versus 50.3% (83/165 )〕, Plt;0.05. The score of patient satisfaction of the no-indwelling tube group was higer than that of the indwelling tube group 〔(9.2±2.8) points versus (6.8±1.7) points〕, Plt;0.05. There were no significant differences in incidences of fat liquefaction and incision complications, A-grade healing rate, mean healing time of incision, and direct medical costs between two groups (Pgt;0.05). ConclusionIt’s unnecessary to indwell a conventional suction drainage tube to prevent fat liquefaction of the obese patient with vertical abdominal incision.
Objective To investigate inter-observer reproducibility in the pathologic diagnosis of breast intraductal proliferative lesions (BDPL). Methods Forty three BDPL patients were diagnosed by criterion of Page. Every specimen from each case was sorted randomly. All slides were classified as mild usual hyperplasia, moderate-severe usual hyperplasia, mild atypical hyperplasia, moderate-severe atypical hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ, or ductal carcinoma in situ with invasion. Inter-observer agreement of the two groups was statistically analyzed using Kappa test. Then we compared all the diagnoses of individual pathologist with the consensus opinion confirmed by two breast pathologists to analyze the diagnostic accuracy and undue diagnosis. Results Inter-observer reproducibility of the trial group was higher than that of the control group (The total K value of 6, 3, and 2 diagnoses in the two groups were 0.289 3, 0.337 1, 0.492 8, 0.100 3, 0.150 3 and 0.340 3, respectively). When the categories were simplified, inter-observer reproducibility increased. There were still undue diagnoses of different degrees among pathologists of the trial group. Conclusion Using the same criteria is an important method to increase the diagnostic reproducibility and accuracy. More practice is needed to familiarize with these criteria.