ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of different drugs for the treatment of intermittent claudication in patients with peripheral arterial disease. MethodsThe PubMed, Scopus, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of intermittent claudication due to peripheral arterial disease from database inception to December 31st, 2021. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Network meta-analysis was then performed using Stata 16.0 software. ResultsA total of 36 studies were included, which involved vasodilators (i.e., cilostazol), lipid-lowering agents (i.e., atorvastatin), antiplatelet drugs (i.e., sarpogrelate), and other types of medicine (i.e., L-carnitine and allopurinol). The results of meta-analysis showed that the effects of simvastatin, bencyclane, and ramipril were superior to cilostazol and other drugs in improving PFWD, among which bencyclane was the most efficient. Besides, simvastatin and ramipril were also superior to cilostazol and other drugs in improving MWD (P<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference between cilostazol and other drugs (P>0.05). In terms of adverse events, iloprost was inferior to other drugs, while sulodexide was better tolerated. ConclusionBencyclane is a preferred choice to improve PFWD for the treatment of IC due to PAD, simvastatin and ramipril to improve MWD; however, their safety is poor. Overall, sulodexide and L-carnitine are ideal medicines for IC. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Bismuth Subgallate/Borneol (SuileTM) (BSB) dressing in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Method s A two-center, randomized controlled parallel-group comparison study was conducted. Between September 2005 and November 2006, 35 patients with nonhealing diabetic foot ulcer (Wagner 2-3 grade) were recruited and divided randomly into the test group (BSB group, n=25) and control group (IG group, n=10). There was no significant difference in general data between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Based on the comprehensive therapy of diabetic foot, ulcers were topically treated by SuileTM dressing and Intrasite gel in the BSB group and IG group, respectively. The ulcer area was measured once a week. Ulcer bleeding was observed and acceptance of the dressing was inquired each week. Results Of the patients, 22 patients in the BSB group and 8 in the IG group completed the clinical trial. Intention to treat (ITT) analysis indicated that the results were excellent in 19 (76%) cases, good in 3 cases (12%), fair in 1 case (4%), and poor in 2 cases (8%) in the BSB group. In the IG group, the results were excellent in 8 cases (80%) cases, fair in 1 case (10%), and poor in 1 case (10%). Per-protocol (PP) analysis showed that the results were excellent in 19 cases (86%) and good in 3 cases (14%) in the BSB group, and were excellent in 8 cases (100%) in the IG group. The results of ITT and PP analysis all showed no significant difference between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The change trend of ulcer areas in the BSB group was similar to that in the IG group. There was no significant difference in the hemostatic effect between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05) and the patients were more likely to accept BSB dressings. Conclusion BSB dressings is an effective, safe, and generally well-tolerated therapy dressing in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.