ObjectiveTo explore the risk factors for multiple nosocomial infection in adult hospitalized patients, so as to provide references for the control of nosocomial infection. MethodsThe clinical data of adults hospitalized patients with nosocomial infection in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University during Jan. 2015 to Dec. 2015 were collected, and the susceptible factors of multiple nosocomial infections referencing to the single nosocomial infection were analyzed. Results1226 cases (1368 case-times) of nosocomial infection were found and the infection rate and the case-time infection rate were 2.24% and 2.49%, respectively. Single factor analysis results showed that the top four risk factors of multiple nosocomial infection included hospital stay ≥30 days (25.5%), first infection time ≥30 days (23.2%), incision type Ⅲ (16.7%), and surgery (13.4%). Logistic regression analysis result showed, after adjusting the influence of age and gender, longer hospital stay was the independent risk factor of multiple nosocomial infection referencing to single nosocomial infection (OR=3.475, 95%CI 2.545 to 4.745). ConclusionLonger hospital stay is the independent risk factor of multiple nosocomial infection of adult hospitalized patients. Measures should be taken to shorten the length of stay in hospital and reduce the exposure to the high-risk environment, so as to reduce the incidence of multiple nosocomial infection.
Objective To evaluate the effect of active screening and intervention of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) on control nosocomial infection in the general intensive care unit (ICU). Methods A non-concurrent control trial was conducted in patients hospitalized in the ICU for more than 24 hours in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University. Patients underwent active screening of MDROs for nasal vestibular swab, throat swab and rectal swab combined with further intensive intervention for patients with positive screening result during Sept. 2014 to Aug. 2015 were included as an intervention group, patients only underwent active screening during Sept. 2013 to Aug. 2014 were included as a screening group, and patients without undergoing active screening during Sept. 2012 to Aug. 2013 were as a control group. SPSS 19.0 software was used to compare the hospital infection rate and the infection rate of MDROs among the three groups. Results A total of 1 773 patients were included, of which 655 patients were in the intervention group, 515 patients were in the screening group, and 603 patients were in the control group. The difference of hospital infection rates among the three groups was statistically significant (χ2=21.087, P < 0.001), and further pairwise comparison results showed that the intervention group was lower than the screening group (χ2=5.891, P=0.015), and the screening group was lower than the control group (χ2=4.259, P=0.039). The adjustment daily infection rate of the intervention group, screening group and control group were 6.69‰, 10.88‰, and 15.39‰, respectively. The difference of MDROs hospital infection rates among the three groups was statistically significant (χ2=21.039, P < 0.001), and further pairwise comparison results showed that the intervention group was lower than the screening group (χ2=5.936, P=0.015), and the screening group was lower than the control group (χ2=5.798, P=0.016). The MDROs thousand daily infection rate of the intervention group was lower than that of the screening group (3.90‰ vs. 7.30‰, χ2=5.999, P=0.014). Conclusion The active screening plus intensive intervention of MDROs can effectively reduce the incidence rates of nosocomial infections and MDROs infections in ICU.