ObjectiveTo investigate the short-term effectiveness of modified tarsal sinus approach and traditional tarsal sinus approach in the treatment of Sanders Ⅱ-Ⅲ type calcaneal fractures.MethodsBetween January 2015 and August 2017, 53 patients with Sanders Ⅱ-Ⅲ type calcaneal fractures were selected and divided into observation group (21 cases, using modified tarsal sinus approach for fracture reduction after exposure of the subtalar joint below the long and short fibular tendon) and control group (32 cases, using traditional tarsal sinus approach) by random number method. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, age, side, cause of injury, fracture type, injury to operation time, and preoperative Böhler angle, Gissane angle, visual analogue scale (VAS) core (P>0.05), which were comparable. The operation time, postoperative drainage volume, postoperative Böhler angle, Gissane angle, and postoperative angle improvement values of the two groups were recorded and compared. VAS score, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, and short-form 36 health survey scale (SF-36) score were used to evaluate the effectiveness.ResultsAll the 53 patients successfully completed the operation without serious complications such as vascular and nerve injury and perioperative death. There was no significant difference in operation time and postoperative drainage volume between the two groups (P>0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 12-36 months (mean, 17 months). No infection, fracture displacement, failure of internal fixation, and malunion of fracture occurred after operation. None of the patients underwent secondary joint fusion. There was no significant difference in fracture healing time between the two groups (t=0.30, P=0.77). The postoperative Böhler angle and Gissane angle at 2 days in the two groups were significantly improved when compared with those before operation (P<0.05); however, there was no significant difference in Böhler angle, Gissane angle, and improvement value between the observation group and the control group at 2 days after operation (P>0.05). VAS scores at 24 hours and 1 year after operation were significantly improved when compared with that before operation in both groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in VAS scores between the two groups at 24 hours and 1 year after operation (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in AOFAS scores between the two groups at 1 year after operation (t=1.46, P=0.15). However, the SF-36 scale score at 1 year after operation was significantly higher than that of the control group (t=2.08, P=0.04). At last follow-up, 2 patients in the observation group and 8 patients in the control group presented subtalar joint stiffness or pain, and there was no significant difference in the incidence between the two groups (χ2=1.98, P=0.16).ConclusionThe modified tarsal sinus approach for the treatment of Sanders Ⅱ-Ⅲ type calcaneal fractures has the advantages of minimal invasion, clear reduction under direct vision, reliable reduction and fixation, and low incision complications.
ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of thoracoscopic assisted reduction and traditional manual reduction with percutaneous intramedullary nail internal fixation in the treatment of mid-clavicular fractures.MethodsA prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted. Twenty-two patients with mid-clavicular fractures who met the selection criteria between March 2012 and March 2017 were recruited and randomly divided into trial group (7 cases, thoracoscopic assisted reduction and percutaneous intramedullary nail fixation) and control group (15 cases, traditional manual reduction and percutaneous intramedullary nail fixation). There was no significant difference in gender, age, side, cause of injury, fracture classification, interval between injury and operation between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time and fracture healing time were recorded and compared between the two groups. The effectiveness was evaluated by Constant-Murley scale at 6 months after operation, which included subjective evaluation indexes (functional activity and pain) and objective evaluation indexes (range of motion of shoulder joint and muscle strength).ResultsThe operation time of the trial group was significantly longer than that of the control group (t=5.881, P=0.000). Patients in both groups were followed up 7-20 months, with an average of 11 months. Satisfactory anatomical reduction achieved in all patients, and all incisions healed by first intension. In the control group, 1 patient had difficulty in removing the intramedullary nail, and 1 patient had fracture nonunion. No fracture nonunion or intramedullary nail rupture in the other patients of two groups. There was no significant difference in fracture healing time between the two groups (t=0.764, P=0.453). At 6 months after operation, there was no significant difference in Constant-Murley scale between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionThe treatment of the mid-clavicular fracture by using thoracoscopic assisted reduction with intramedullary nail internal fixation requires longer operation time, but does not require fluoroscopy. The effectiveness is comparable to that of traditional surgery.